Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animals/Assessment

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Animals/Assessment page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Animals Project‑class

WikiProject Animals/Assessment is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Project

This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Which articles to access[edit]

Because there are so many articles that fall within the spectrum of WP:ANIMALS decedent projects, I think we should try to keep our focus on the articles that don't fall within a decedent projects scope, at least when it comes to the project banner and assessments. So I propose the only articles we should assess are articles that don't fall into the following taxa (and below) unless they are considered Top or High importance articles for the Animals WikiProject.

Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Vertebrata
- I believe all of lower taxa are covered by WP:MAM, WP:BIRDS or WP:AAR but Vertebrata itself is not.
Class: Gastropoda
Class: Cephalopoda

J. Hall • ^(Talk) 18:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turbellaria[edit]

Would anyone like to re-assess Turbellaria - I think it's better than stub-class now. --Philcha (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It looks like a C-class now. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 13:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finncattle[edit]

Please asses/reassess Finncattle, I expanded it. Pitke (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking assessment of updated article[edit]

Hey there,

I would appreciate it if someone could conduct an assessment on an article I have been working on for an education course. The article is White-nosed saki. I have been working on it for weeks and would love for someone to check it out for me. I have already added this Wikiproject's template to the talk page but haven't yet had it assessed.

Thanks in advance!

Vikster28 (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]