2018[edit]

January[edit]

Would like to be added to active reviewers so I can attempt some AfC reviewing using the script. I meet the standards for such reviewing and have recently been added the New Pages reviewers permission. BusterD (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request to join. I have been around for nearly 4 years, although with a low edit count and most of that WikiGnoming. I have some meatier stuff in there, none of it contentious, and have been doing some more serious stuff recently. I am just putting the finishing touches to my first article submission - a count against me I realise - which is how I stumbled across this corner of Wikipedia. I have read and understand the instructions and it would seem that this sort of thing may be right up my street. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you. Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Insertcleverphrasehere left a note on my talk page asking me if I would like to sign up to become an Articles for Creation reviewer? I don't have as much time for the WP as I did in the past, but I'm happy to put my name in if you think I would be a good candidate, and if checking in only periodically works.-Classicfilms (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you for the help! Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am happy to help out when I can. Please add me to the approve list. Jllm06 (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you. Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to help with reviewing drafts, using AFCH. Behnam (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done A bit inactive but I think you'll be fine. Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was previously accepted as a reviewer by Primefac on 11:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) but I recently changed my username to this current one. And it says that I cannot access AFCH because my new name isnt listed on the participants list. Please re-add me into the list. EROS ^message 11:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by Primefac. Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Insertcleverphrasehere left a note on my talk page asking me if I would like to sign up to become an Articles for Creation reviewer. I am happy to help out when I can. Please add me to the approve list. Thank you. Jllm06 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Not sure why the request was duplicated, but already done, thank you! Alex Shih (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to become an AfC reviewer please. I meet all the criteria listed on the Participants page and I am eligible.SyndicaterUI78 (talk) 02:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. You do not meet the criteria (it's 500 article edits). Primefac (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know but according to my edit count, it says "507 edits". SyndicaterUI78 (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You do indeed have 500 total edits, but we require 500 edits to articles. You can see your namespace totals at your xtools page. Primefac (talk) 03:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, would like to help out at AfC and reduce the backlog of drafts sent for review. I'm really interested in helping out new Wikipedians. Please let me know if you would like me to demonstrate or send any additional information Lee Vilenski(talk) 14:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Please let us know if you have any questions. Primefac (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to become an AfC reviewer please and I FINALLY meet all the criteria (I actually made 500 article edits this time). SyndicaterUI78 (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. You're still at 228. As an additional note, simply spamming pages with maintenance templates does not demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies regarding notability, verifiability, etc. Primefac (talk) 18:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have been invited to apply for this. Since 2003 I have made 179,000 edits, created 671 articles, 573 categories, 446 redirects, 28 disambiguation pages, a handful of templates, performed 56 merges, and moved 2,059 pages (see User:JackofOz/All pages 2017-18 and earlier). -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 21:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have been checking new users' edits for vandalism / promotional / spam edits, and I often come across new users who have submitted obviously unsuitable drafts. I'm requesting to be added so I can help trim these from the backlog if I find them. LynxTufts (talk) 19:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm interested in helping, especially since in my other life I'm party to expanding the backlog. Guettarda (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do my bit to whittle down the backlog. A Train^talk 23:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Train and Guettarda being sysops you both can add yourself...(this seems to happen often enough that perhaps a note should be added somewhere..) Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I appreciate the sentiment, but you have a point. I've added another line to the header. While I was there I added them both. Primefac (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I looked through the description, and I wasn't entirely sure, so I thought it better to ask. Guettarda (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add me please, I'd like to reduce the backlog. AdA&D 00:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please add me as an active contributor MadeYourReadThis (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could I be added? Chetsford (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting. James (^talk/_contribs) 13:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting. Personman (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. There's potential for growth here, but at the moment the vast majority of your article edits are minor fixes, and otherwise very little creation/administration (i.e. AFD) experience to demonstrate an understanding of Wikipedia policy. No prejudice for re-requesting in a few months. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'd like to be granted access to the reviewing tools. Thank you! ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to be able to help review AFC drafts to help decrease the backlog. I have read and understand the instructions. Thank you. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probation. I am rather concerned at the fact that you have had two articles speedy deleted out from under you as advertising (and by that, I mean that you were the last one to significantly work on the pages before they were nominated). Be careful, ask questions, and if by the end of February a review finds no major issues then you'll be all set. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to be readded back, I used to help with this before, I got busy, now I have time to help with this project once again. oo7565 (talk)Oo7565 (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to volunteer. I've read the requirements and while I'm not massively experienced I've done some anti-vandalism work, AfD commenting (incl. some page rescue) and article creation. Mortee (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to volunteer and help with the backlog! Trying to find new ways to get involved after some inactivity. Strombollii (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, the majority of your edits came more than five years ago (and things have changed a fair bit since then). Keep being active and there's no prejudice against requesting again in a few months. Primefac (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to volunteer. I've been coming across old uncleared drafts, and something needs to be done about the backlog. --Calton | Talk 23:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request to participate as reviewer. --FocalPoint (talk) 09:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. You added him or her into the wrong place. -- -- -- 08:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed by Primefac. Thanks, -- -- -- 19:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request to participate as reviewer. Auchmill (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request to participate as reviewer. Tayste (edits) 07:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto the above. Home Lander (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request to participate as reviewer. Dan arndt (talk) 02:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would also be happy to help, I meet the criteria, and I have read and understand the instructions. Dan Koehl (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I will probably not be the most active reviewer this year due to other commitments but I certainly believe that I will be able to create a difference however small it may be to the backlog — [[ F R ™ ]] 08:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Annie_Sinha_Roy really makes me question your understanding of notability; and Anti_Romeo_squads_in_uttar_Pradesh was speedy deleted as A7 and A10? (though 8 months ago) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC) (non-admin comment)[reply]

Galobtter-I understand your concerns about Annie Sinha Roy(The impetus came from here and I didn't/couldn't believe that it was wrong on notability). As a more recent exhibit that I have recently re-read and understood the policy I would link this. I will be intentionally conservative when accepting drafts. If you have any more questions you can always ask — [[ F R ™ ]] 09:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On hold - I'm not overly thrilled with the idea of a full third of your created articles being deleted (though at this particular moment it's only one fourth). I'm putting this on hold until the current AFD closes. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn-I have myself been thinking this over and have come to the conclusion that I am actually ineligible to join. Thanks for the time. I'll be back sometime in April with more experience. — [[ F R ™ ]] 09:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to do some reviewing, but I mostly stick to Soviet-aviation topics on wikipedia.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello all, is it possible to be added to the AfC list of contributors? I think I meet the standards. Bkissin (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'd love to be added to the list of contributors. Thanks! NathanielTheBold (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would love to play my part in reducing the severe backlog. I have more than than 1000 mainspace edits and have created 23 articles, including numerous BLPs, so, I think that I am eligible to join the project.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 21:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Change of username; re-applying. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 19:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I work very hard in the draft space nominating drafts for deletion and improving drafts. I would like to be a reviewer and I do meet the criteria. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. I think you're a pretty decent gnome and good vandalism-fighter, but I just don't see enough content creation/management to justify giving access. Primefac (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Thanks for your comment. Although I haven't created a lot of articles (only 1 article), I still know and understand the relevant policies and I would like to help out. I do a lot of deletion tagging and cleanups to drafts so I still think I would be a good candidate to review drafts. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February[edit]

Hello, I would like to help review AFC drafts and believe I meet the criteria. Thanks! Thsmi002 (talk) 04:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probation - I was a little concerned about the various nominations of pages you had written for deletion, but I see they're a relatively small fraction of your total work. If there are no issues following a review at the end of March (assuming a reasonable amount of activity at AFC) then you will be all set. Primefac (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All criteria met. Please add me to the participants list. MizukaS (talk) 08:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MizukaS, I'm a bit concerned with your interactions with other users. You've been involved in some minor edit wars on a few pages, and your talk page history shows a rather acerbic attitude towards those who disagree with you. Why do you think you would be a good fit for AFC, when almost everyone who comes to you will be attempting to argue why you made the wrong decision? Primefac (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per the lack of reply. Primefac (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm interested in being added. I feel I meet the criteria, and being able to deal with drafts properly would be a good extension of my usual vandalism patrol. --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 17:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Insertcleverphrasehere left a message on my talk page about helping with the AfC backlog, and I would like to participate. Please add me to the participants list. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
GRuban (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

Please add me to the project because I am an experienced editor. I submitted a draft for AfC, and noticed the backlog was huge. Naturally I can't review the one I submitted, but I can help the general backlog. --GRuban (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I believe you added him or her into the wrong place. -- -- -- 06:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was going by ASCII sorting, which places an R before an r, which is what AWB uses and annoys me every time but I've kind of gotten into the habit. I'll be running the numbers later this week and the list will likely be re-sorted then anyway. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Power~enwiki (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I don't plan on using this regularly, but occasionally get asked to help with the backlogs, or find situations where an editor is struggling with the process and it would be easiest for me to review a draft (or to decline drafts of pages previously deleted at NPP). power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done TonyBallioni (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MrX (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I meet all of the criteria and have reviewed thousands of articles via NPP. Thank you.- Mr X 🖋 13:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickerd (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I was requested to help out by Insertcleverphrasehere. I previously didn't have a lot of time to help out, but I'm happy to help with the back log as I now have a bit more time on my hands. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 04:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

L293D (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I'm a little new here but I've made 3,300 contributions and I would like to help clear the backlog. Thanks. L293D (✉) 16:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation: fairly new, but you've created a few articles on your own already that seem fine, and seem to have s grasp of the policy. I'm a bit concerned with the issues being raised on your page re: reverts: this is less than typical when dealing with anti-vandal work, but because content work is different, I'm fine with giving you a go. Come back at the end of March and ping me or Primefac, and we'll review and make it permanent if there are no issues. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alfie (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I'm active on the live IRC channel, it would be helpful to be able to reject WP:SNOW-y drafts. I don't intend on regularly reviewing articles just yet (although I'm sure I'll do one every now and then), but certainly when someone asks me to look at their article in IRC it'd be nice to not leave them hanging around when their article is woefully incomplete. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 13:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done you only have about a month and a half of active editing, only have 360 mainspace edits, and of those, 300 are automated (and given the Huggle breakdown, I'm assuming most of it was vandal fighting and not related to content policies as CSD or AfD might be). Come back when you have more experience dealing with our content policies, and more time (I would wait at least two months). TonyBallioni (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lunchscale (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I'm an old Wikipedian looking to return to help tackle the backlog that's suddenly built up! Lunchscale ^Talk! ^Contrib! 20:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. While I appreciate your enthusiasm upon returning to Wikipedia, you haven't done any significant editing since 2010, and the consensus on quite a few things has changed since then. I have no problems granting after you've demonstrated a bit more activity, so feel free to reapply once you've done some more editing. Primefac (talk) 00:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adamfinmo (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I'm a habitual lurker and gnome. I'm looking for a way to help out with backlogs.--Adamfinmo (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NottNott (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

Looking to see what I can do for AfC, as there is a backlog. I meet the criteria and it will be a nice change from normal anti-vandal work. -Nott Nott 22:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

jmorrison230582 (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

Long-time user, notified at WP:FOOTY that there is a backlog in this area. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

jason.nlw (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

Please add me to the project because a regularly host Wikipedia events and train volunteers to edit. The ability to review and move their drafts would be very useful Jason.nlw (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not declining this, just musing (for other patrollers to contemplate) but I'm a bit hesitant to have you reviewing the drafts of the people you're helping out, because there's too much potential for a "well, it's okay, and I don't want you to feel bad" move. However, there is no obligation for a user to use the AFC process, so you would be perfectly able to move their drafts anyway if you felt they were of sufficient quality. Primefac (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

courtesy ping. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, no reply. Primefac (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March[edit]

User:Ravenswing[edit]

Ravenswing (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Happy to help with the backlog, been around 13 years and for 50K edits. Ravenswing 01:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:In Memoriam A.H.H.[edit]

In Memoriam A.H.H. (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I would like be an reviewer of drafts please. I will be happy to review the articles. I also meet all the requirements, due to my account being 1 year old and my 507 edits to mainspace. Thanks. Do the Danse Macabre! (Talk) 13:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now, mostly due to a lack of evidence of procedural knowledge of the various criteria required for assessing a draft's suitability. Primefac (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hammersoft[edit]

Hammersoft (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

In patrolling new accounts and Special:Newpages I frequently come across pages created by new users who have no idea what they are doing. In many of these cases, the pages are nonsensical, pointless, or have no hope of ever becoming an article. Today's example; User:Pop4462/sandbox. With a backlog of >2500, I don't think the backlog needs to be made even longer by such pages. I would like the ability to review (and decline) these requests via the helper script, as this is the 'correct' way to handle such requests. I've read the reviewing instructions and the criteria and feel I meet them. Thanks, Hammersoft (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tomer T[edit]

Tomer T (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help with reviewing drafts. I'm an experienced user and has been a sysop for many years in Hebrew Wikipedia and a checkuser there. Tomer T (talk) 13:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TakuyaMurata[edit]

TakuyaMurata (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I want to be able use the script to accept the AfC submission, mostly math-related submissions. Taku (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. While I do appreciate your interest, your overall track record with draft applications recently is problematic. There is no requirement for drafts to go through the AFC process, and you're more than welcome to move your own drafts (or other's drafts) to the Article space if you feel they are ready. I don't have any prejudice against a new request for access in a few months, but now is not quite the time. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC) As an administrative note, I removed two comments that I believed were likely to instigate more heat than light, though I do appreciate them being made and they were taken into consideration prior to their removal.[reply]

User:Primefac User:TakuyaMurata's editong has been problem free for some time now. They have an interest in clearing math topics from Draft space after creating a nice list of all math drafts. I endorse granting them access to this tool at this point. Legacypac (talk) 18:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I never put a timeframe on their re-application should they so choose to make one. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SteinbDJ[edit]

SteinbDJ (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Happy to help with the backlog. I haven't been very active recently, but I've been around for many years and have over 15,000 edits. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 17:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

only 8 edits since 2013 suggests this editor is unlikely to be up to speed with current inclusion standards and WP:CSD etc. Suggest getting some recent experience on WP:AFD and WP:MFD to familiarize with current standards that have changed (like Corp Spam) and then reapplying. (Non-admin comment) Legacypac (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per above. You haven't really edited since 2013. Consider applying again in a month or two when you have more recent experience. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Malcolmrevere[edit]

Malcolmrevere (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to assist with tackling the backlog. I've been an active user within this online community for almost 5 years - since September of 2013. I created and infrequently edit Kaytranada; I recently made several edits to Kali Uchis. I believe that I have a strong understanding of the content / quality to permit within this community; I'm willing to diligently study and follow the guidelines. I recently requested for my user page to be deleted (just remembered that) ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --

Malcolmrevere · contributions Malcolmrevere (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment thank-you for your interest. With just 34 edits in the past 365 days and just over 500 edits in all time I don't believe you yet have the experience with deletion and content policies required to handle AfC yet - frankly it might be overwhelmingly. I also don't see any recent participation in WP:MfD or WP:AFD or use of WP:CSD. Can I suggest helping out in those three areas of draft and page management first to gain some relevent experience for AfC? Turn on Twinkle and start looking for junk. Cheers Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per the above. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:IagoQnsi[edit]

IagoQnsi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I'd like to become an AfC reviewer. I am already a new page patroller and a rollbacker, and would like to be able to help with the occasional AfC submission as well. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

experienced editor here and especially at Commons. Uses rollback, CSD, PROD regularly. Works on improving pages. Just the kind of editor we need at AfC. Legacypac (talk) 07:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:333-blue[edit]

333-blue (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I was an AFC reviewer before and I had requested to remove my permission. Now, I have more time, plus that the backlog is fairly large, I want to become an AFC reviewer again. – 333 -blue at 07:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Welcome back! Primefac (talk) 13:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jjjjjjdddddd[edit]

Jjjjjjdddddd (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I volunteer for AFC review, as I've done some work with draftspace before, and have a good grasp of inclusion criteria. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:andrewman327[edit]

andrewman327 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I was a part of this project until my account was compromised. It took several months of working with the developers to regain control. Now that I'm back, I'm eager to get back into things! Andrew³²⁷ 19:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm a little concerned with your lack of activity in the last few years (i.e. since 2013) but your recent CSD and AFD logs look pretty good so it would appear that you've stayed current on the relevant guidelines and policies. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sergei Gutnikov[edit]

Sergei Gutnikov (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help to clear the backlog Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{not done}}, does not meet the minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)~~ Minimum edit requirement met. Primefac (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the off chance I'm not the first one to review this, there's a peripheral discussion on my talk. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non administrator note:-- I will request you to reapply in two months or so, after you have participated in more AFDs etc., so that we have a track record to evaluate.I am very uncomfortable about granting the right to users meeting bare-minimum requirements who have remained almost entirely inactive for around the last few years.~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also pinging Primefac.~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are the criteria for if meeting the criteria means nothing to you? Or is this resistance caused by my Russian name in the current political climat? Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down there Sergei Gutnikov. We have multiple criteria for joining AFC, and a user needs to demonstrate that they meet them all (or at least to a reasonable degree). If you're this defensive about just gaining access to AFCH, how will you react when you have dozens of new editors asking why you've declined their "obviously totally notable" drafts? Primefac (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will use arguments and show evidence for justification, and will not refer to extra rules added on the way after my intial criticism is adequately responded to. Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 13:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher)(Non admin comments)-Sergei Gutnikov-You are ineligible for enrolling into the project as it cannot be proved that you meet criteria 4 (i.e you have a demonstrated understanding of the policies mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various special notability categories.)Thank You.(courtesty pinging Primefac) — F R ⁺ 09:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. While I appreciate your enthusiasm and interest in joining, there is insufficient evidence that you know and understand the rules and guidelines for the English Wikipedia, which as mentioned has significantly different notability criteria compared to other languages. I have no prejudice against you re-applying in the future. Primefac (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eagleash[edit]

Eagleash (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am already involved as a new page reviewer. I have been active on Wikipedia for over five years and created 70+ articles and made around 36,000 edits. I frequently find myself reading new drafts (sometimes improving them or otherwise helping newer editors) but without the tools available to properly review. It was suggested to me sometime back that I could usefully contribute to this project also and I would like to be able to do so and learn more about the process. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 05:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A very welcome addition. I've seen this editors good work on Drafts. Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diptanshu Das[edit]

* Diptanshu Das (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am a long-standing editor. I am a new page reviewer and would like to help with pages waiting for review. A recent request for the same (on my talk page) got me interested. Diptanshu 💬 12:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jbhunley[edit]

Jbhunley (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Please move me from Inactive to Active list. -- Thank you. Jbh ^Talk 14:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Jbh ^Talk 14:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done TonyBallioni (talk) 14:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bellezzasolo[edit]

Bellezzasolo (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I’d like to help out with reviewing AFCs. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 10:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abhinav0908[edit]

Abhinav0908 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help reviewing AFCs. I have more than 1200 active edits and have been editing for 5 years. Abhinav0908 (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinav0908, are you planning on becoming more active? Unlike permissions, users are removed from the AFC list after a few months of inactivity, and it looks like you've only been editing Wikipedia about once a year for a while now. Primefac (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac, yes I am planning to be more regular here. Abhinav0908 (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:IVORK[edit]

IVORK (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help out reviewing AFCs. 8000+ edits, (ECo, EM, N, Rv, Ro) usergroups, most of my edits have been tagging newly created articles, but would like to stretch out a bit. Have some ~340 CSD tags in my CSD log with above 95% being processed. Cheers — IVORK _Discuss 22:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Makro[edit]

Makro (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I was part of Afc (I think) a while ago. I took a break from Wiki but am back now and wish to be part of Afc again. I am sure I meet all criteria. Makro (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher), not an admin. Sorry, but I suggest that this should be declined. Makro does not seem to have any clear idea of what content should be in Wikipedia, and what should not, nor of the relevant policy and practice; two recent creations, Nathan Shaw and Sabrina Schloss, are now at AfD (here and here), and neither seems likely to survive – for good reason. I find this comment particularly concerning. The history of sockpuppetry is perhaps far enough in the past. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Makro/CSD_log? Suggest getting some experience with page curation via CSD/XfD first. Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A) I was NEVER a sockpuppet. B) I created the mentioned articles in good faith. If they are worthy of being on Wikipedia then good if not then so be it. Makro (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC is tough work that requires demonstrated experience with Drafts. I've been working on an introduction you may find helpful. User:Legacypac/Cleanup Guide Legacypac (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per the above. You're welcome to re-apply when there isn't an active ANI regarding your activities and you've demonstrated an understanding of the notability (and BLP) rules. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TeriEmbrey[edit]

TeriEmbrey (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I would like to help review AFC drafts and believe I meet the criteria. Thanks! TeriEmbrey (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Acebulf[edit]

Acebulf (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I think that AFC is an important portal for retaining editors, and that the backlog of articles is unfortunate. I'd very much like to help new editors make good articles, and help them become solid contributors to the project. Acebulf (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 year editor with over 700 successful page creations and only a handful of deletions. Evidently knows what good content looks like. High edit survival rate. A welcome addition. Legacypac (talk) 02:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. As a minor note, user has only created 14 pages in the article space, but everything else looks pretty good. Primefac (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The stat I checked was evidently a total. That's a lot of talkpage creations! Legacypac (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a lot of vandal-fighting, so User talk: is probably my most active namespace, statistics wise. Out of 14 articles, 1 of them is actually just a draft layout for Algo Centre Mall that was deleted once the new layout was adopted, and there's also a WP:TOOSOON article on Mark Barberio that was deleted in 2009. The article was eventually reinstated when Barberio made the NHL. Acebulf (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vexations[edit]

Vexations (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Please remove Mduvekot and add Vexations (name change). Vexations (talk) 22:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April[edit]

User:Newroderick895[edit]

Newroderick895 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Already declined, let's let this rest. Primefac (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I would like to be added since i am extended confirmed, very active, and read the instructions.newroderick895 (talk) 11:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Try again when you'll have 500 ARTICLE edits. -- -- -- 23:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? @-- -- --:, i have more than 1000+ edits and stop claiming i am far below that. Newroderick895 13:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Newroderick895: -- -- -- is talking saying you need more than 500 article edits. That means you have to have made 500 edits to articles, not just, for example your userpage. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but it's a little early to request this right. Get comfortable with policies and guideline for a month or two and then you will be considered. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I use Xtools and does Main mean article? Newroderick895 13:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is called "Main" because it is the main space, the articles, what we should be trying to build instead of losing our times at drama boards of all sorts. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then i am almost 500, so if i reach that, please accept it! Newroderick895 14:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just edit count that shows experience - see WP:EDITCOUNTITIS - but mostly comprehension of Wikipedia policies. Edit count is a quick way of getting an idea of experience, but is nothing close to proof of any kind. I've seen once a user who made 336 useless edits in his sandbox just to increase his edit count. Real experience is demonstrated in other kinds of things (AFDs, RFCs, and stuff). I'm a bit concerned about your behavior at this AfD, for example. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That was before and today as of this article, that article stayed intact because once on josh axe, i copypasted without knowing, i have improved long so after the AFD, i have a understanding on some policies. Newroderick895 15:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC reviewing requires extensive knowledge of inclusion and deletion policy. I'm working on a guide that you may find helpful in building experience and a demonstrated track record that qualifies an editor for AfC and WP:NPR. User:Legacypac/Cleanup Guide Good luck and I'm always looking for suggestions on making the guide better. Legacypac (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-@Newroderick895:--As evident by your behavior at PFac's t/p and over here, if you are so aggressive to well-established-users, who are advising/replying to you in good faith and so defensive about the retrieval of a minor permission, how you're going to behave in a proper and civil manner, when the creators of every draft rejected by you, returns and ask you queries after queries, for they firmly believe that their startup/garage-band is the most notable thing to happen in the universe post Big-Bang?! And, frankly, I'm not seeing any minimal understanding of meta-issues from your editing-patterns.So, try after about 3 months of AFD participation and good content creation.Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

how did i reject or accept drafts?, i never did such thing. Newroderick895 15:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:@Newroderick895: Winged blades was referring to situations likely to arise if you were to be granted any permissions relating to this project.
As a freindly word of advice, I would suggest you follow the recommendations made above and re-apply at a later date. You are not doing yourself any favours by continuing to pursue matters here. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:Barbara (WVS)[edit]

Barbara (WVS) (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help out with the backlog. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 05:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, put please remember your TBAN. Primefac (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SunnyBoi[edit]

SunnyBoi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I'd like to be considered to assist with this project. Thank you! SunnyBoi (talk) SunnyBoi (talk) 04:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. As much as I appreciate your enthusiasm, you have two very recent declines on drafts (one which was declined twice in twenty minutes) and very little AFD experience. Please re-apply in a few months once you have a bit more experience. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TryKid[edit]

TryKid (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have met the criteria and I think I can help a little. TryKid (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, you do not meet the minimum editing criteria, which is 500 article edits. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Netoholic[edit]

Netoholic (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to participate on occasion reviewing articles in my knowledge areas. I'm a longtime user with plenty of edits. Netoholic @ 01:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mdann52[edit]

Mdann52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Looks like I've been removed for inactivity. Looking to get back into this now. Mdann52 (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, welcome back. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:StartTerminal[edit]

StartTerminal (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've been wanting to get into the whole AFC reviewing thing for a while now. Reverting vandals gets boring sometimes and I would like to help out with other things on Wikipedia. I've read over the instructions and feel that I could be helpful at AFC. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc)

Done. Primefac (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Please correct alphabetization. -- -- -- 20:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by Primefac (01:07, 23 April). Thanks, -- -- -- 23:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:CASSIOPEIA[edit]

CASSIOPEIA (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I have been the New Page Reviewer for a while and would like to help up on AFC. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Primefac:. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 21:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:DocumentError[edit]

DocumentError (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have read the criteria, my account is more than 90 days old, and I have in excess of 500 edits. DocumentError (talk) 20:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DocumentError, more from a procedural standpoint than anything, but with Legacypac (courtesy ping only, please do not reply) being a significant contributor to this project, will this affect your ability to effectively participate in the project? Primefac (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per Special:PermaLink/838063148#your_question. Primefac (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pkbwcgs[edit]

Pkbwcgs (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am interested to be an AfC reviewer. My previous request was declined because of lack of content creation. However, I created two articles since then and contributed to content in some articles related to the Commonwealth Games so there is more content creation since the previous request. I contributed to finding copyvios in drafts as well and cleaning up. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Randomness74[edit]

Randomness74 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I like to generally look over new pages from time to time and I have good general knowledge of CSD, PROD, and AfD criteria, and what level an article is at. I want to help reduce this backlog and help these new users create their articles. Randomness74 (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum edit criteria. Primefac (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Учхљёная[edit]

Учхљёная (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I currently meet all of the criteria listed (>500 article edits, extendedconfirmed user, been a user for >1 year), and I would be happy to help with reviewing drafts in general or any other task that is assiğned to me. User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 15:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Given your recent block history and questionable article creation history, I am not comfortable granting you access to AFCH at this time. Primefac (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Okay, I suppose that's fair. May I ask, will I be able to re-apply at some point, and if so, when? -User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 16:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

You're welcome to re-apply, but I'd suggest waiting a few months before doing so in order to demonstrate that the issues have passed. Primefac (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May[edit]

User:Quek157[edit]

Quek157 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Just visited this page, just wondering do I qualify for Afc reviewer. Not that I am doing WP:HATCOLLECT but just checking. ~~I do not want it now due to lack of time but should I have time can I help?~~ with GA out i should have time to help to reduce the backlog Quek157 (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Quek157 (talk) 09:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

just to add, I wanted to help because I am seeing too many articles taken to Afds which can be saved if the authors can make it proper at first as well as too many articles that are deleted where they should not need to be created. --Quek157 (talk) 19:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JogiAsad[edit]

JogiAsad (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I'm interested in this project, and wiling to help as a Afc reviewer . JogiAsad

06:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done--This's an IAR decline, despite the lack of a mop.You were indefinitely topic banned from all deletion processes, for a spurious understanding of our notability guidelines along with other issues at this ANI thread i.e the community don't have any trust in your understanding and actions as to the evaluation of notability of an article-subject, (which is the sole primary task of AFC).~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, anyway.JogiAsad (talk) 03:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rqiang84[edit]

Rqiang84 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Good day Sir, I'm here to apply for the Afc reviewer, I'm currently putting up and updating infoboxes of people/celebrities (mostly Chinese, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong ones at the peak) and buildings, including articles which I am familiar or associated with.

Not done. You have over 500 mainspace edits but they are all tiny minor edits of a few bytes each. The clean up work you do is very important, but it is not of the kind that demonstrates that you have the experience and knowledge of policies and guidelines for reviewing drafts. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:KingAndGod[edit]

KingAndGod (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to use the script to review drafts. KingAndGod 09:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamesrichards12345[edit]

Jamesrichards12345 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi there guys and girls,

I am interested in joining your 'Articles for creation' program and help with your rising backlog, I literally just reached 500 main edits and decided to try and apply. But if I am not accepted at first I will understand, I can always try again in the future haha.

Have a nice day,

James James Richards 03:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

500 edits is just one of the requirements. A good understanding of deletion policy and what is an acceptable answer is even more important. You might find User:Legacypac/Cleanup Guide useful in developing experience in these areas. Legacypac (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done These are all minor minor edits, mostly unsourced content additions, and no use of edit summaries. Please address these issues and gain some experience as a Recent Changes or Vandalism patroller first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Septrillion[edit]

Septrillion (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been around for some time, appear to meet all the criteria, with AfD experience this time, and would like to help with the backlog. Septrillion (talk) 02:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per this and that; user shows a tendency towards not paying suitable attention to detail when performing relatively routine tasks, which leads me to believe that the appropriate care will not be taken when more important tasks are undertaken. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How long do you think I should wait to demonstrate that these issues have been resolved? Septrillion (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Septrillion (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about time, it's about a demonstration of ability. You've made some unnecessary mistakes in the recent past, and while no one is perfect there needs to be some indication that mistakes are the exception rather than something to be expected. Primefac (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've already gotten the rollback flag reassigned. Septrillion (talk) 17:12, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SkyGazer 512[edit]

SkyGazer 512 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been reverting vandalism for a while now. Over a month ago, I started patrolling Special:NewPagesFeed several times a day - cleaning them up, expanding them, moving them appropriately, adding maintenance templates to them, requesting for them to be merged, and/or tagging them for speedy deletion/PROD. I would really like to become a part of this project and help out with the AfC backlog, which is why I'm requesting to become a participant.--SkyGazer 512 ^{What will you say? / What did I do?} 20:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good CSD log and good 17 articles created with zero deletes. You should ask for New Page Patrol WP:PERM as that is closely associated with AfC. Legacypac (talk) 20:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: I'm actually planning on requesting for the New Page Reviewer right sometime in the near future. However, it seems like they prefer requesters to be active AfC reviewers, which I'm not right now. :)--SkyGazer 512 ^{What will you say? / What did I do?} 22:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think it would probably be best if I reviewed new pages for about another month or so before applying, just to make sure I'm solid on CSD.--SkyGazer 512 ^{What will you say? / What did I do?} 22:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. I expect NPR flag will be an AfC requirement at some point soon as we try to align the processes. Legacypac (talk) 05:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

will existing Afc reviewers be given the NPR flag (I know and read through the entire conversation in the project page) based on (a conseusus reach) criteria instead of asking at WP:PERM. And what are the key difference in criteria for Afc and NPP as on paper they are the same. These need not to be clarified here just food for thought --Quek157 (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Quek157:NPP criteria are stronger enforced, thats the main difference. That's how I got rejected at NPP. -- » Shadowowl | talk 14:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

noted with thanks but with actrial now becoming acperm things may need to change. shall wait patiently Quek157 (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We encouraged (and still encourage) AfC users to apply at PERM. It's not automatic. If rejected you can work on overcoming the rejection reason. Legacypac (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Infinity Knight[edit]

Infinity Knight (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help up on AFC. Thank you! Infinity Knight (talk) 03:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough experience with page curation to be effective here yet. I'd encourage you to get some experience in WP:AFD and WP:MFD first. You should also enable your CSD log and PROD logs in Twinkle then go forth and tag some junk. Legacypac (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Broccoli and Coffee[edit]

Broccoli and Coffee (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Looking to help with backlog. Thanks Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 04:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Not done~~ for now. Based on your talk page you have a delightful temperament, which is important for an AFC reviewer, but there is very experience in any of the "content quality" areas (XFD, CSD, WP space, etc) and a lot of your edits are automated (or semi-automated). I suggest you hang around WT:AFC for a while, maybe join in some discussions, and ask again in a few months. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Broccoli and Coffee, I've revised your status to

Probation - Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 12:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trillfendi[edit]

Trillfendi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've created enough articles to be very familiar with the process of article creation and how to fix articles to get approved. None of my articles has been deleted. Therefore, I would like to help with the backlog. :) Trillfendi (talk) 21:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation - you have a decent number of successful drafts, but there are also a few declined ones. Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siddiqsazzad001[edit]

Siddiqsazzad001 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi. I have knowledge about criteria. I know which article should be reviewed or which should be not. I have good knowledge about WP:MOS policy. All the article should be from the neutral point of view. I could help wiki to review the perfect article. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 12:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siddiqsazzad001, a few thoughts/questions. First, how does MOS relate to the draft process? Second, what do you mean "perfect article"? Third, how confident are you in your abilities to find copyrighted content, given your previous block for posting copyright-violating material on Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Well, WP:MOS knowledge is needed for checking draft article style. Perfect article means that an article should be from the neutral point of view, notability (WP:GNG) and must be reliable sources. I confident about my abilities to find copyrighted content with Earwig's Copyvio Detector and Google search engine. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 11:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation - just as a note MOS issues are not reasons to decline (ever). Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TryKid[edit]

TryKid (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I think I'm ready for this, and I've read instructions. My main focus will be rejecting articles that are obviously bad and will never survive AfD. TryKid (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just commenting - Did you participated in Afd before and the main focus here is to help articles to survive Afd and for those who don't, help them by peer reviewing to survive Afd. Just to make sure you are in the right place. (non - administrator comment) --Quek157 (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen some old drafts that are just unnotable and just very bad but nobody rejected them. I can do that. Not like I just like to delete, I've also tried to improve drafts that have potential, like Sab Jholmaal Hai (from this to this).
TryKid (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will advice you to visit AFD to help in discussion also. End of my hijacking here. Do indicate edit conflict in the future, thanks a lot --Quek157 (talk) 16:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quek157, I'm not sure what "Do indicat edit conflict in the future" means, and thanks for the advice, I'll visit AfD too.
TryKid (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

it's okay, no worries Quek157 (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation - you have a decent number of successful drafts, but there are also a few declined ones. Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac

ask questions

My first will be - what's probation? I see that I can access helper script now, but I don't think I'm allowed to use it now.
TryKid (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It means that after two months we'll evaluate your reviewing, and if there are no major issues then you're solid. It also means that if any serious issues come up during your probationary period you'll be removed from the list. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Etothepi[edit]

Etothepi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've done a lot of AfD nominations and spam swatting. I'm also a new page reviewer. etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 17:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:ZI Jony[edit]

ZI Jony (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help with reviewing drafts. I'm an experienced user and I think that I can do it very well with the afc helper script rights. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you already have access. Primefac (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access for this, even I have not requested also, you can see I'm working on it but I'm doing manual process only with good edit summary. when I look note not to review without permission then I stop and request. so please add me in the list and assign permissions to review. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 01:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you've been creating a fake edit summary saying you were using AFCH when you weren't? Primefac (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non Admin Comment I searched through the entire list of AFC reviewers, their name is not there @Primefac:, likely they are using the manual method which is in When AFCH is down. --Quek157 (talk) 13:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac As you said it's not like that because I was don't know about AFCH is an automated edits which can have only with afc helper script rights. so I hope what I have done that will not affect to assign the rights. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 15:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that is dedication to do this manually. Legacypac (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation. Your first few "unofficial" reviews look okay. Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Mighty Glen[edit]

The Mighty Glen (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've got a good track record in article categorization, new article improvement, AFD sorting, anti-vandalism, anti-spam, and sockpuppet hunting, and have made good use of rollback rights. I'd like to contribute to AFC review as well. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Harshrathod50[edit]

Harshrathod50 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

After creating some articles here, I would also like to be a part of AfC team. Usually I check for books, horror and Indian cinema related articles. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: No response, why? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 17:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm still looking into things? Primefac (talk) 17:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation - I'm a little bit concerned about a few conversations I've seen regarding your interpretation of reliable sources, as well as some ~~arguments~~disagreements you've been a part of, but we'll try it out and see how it goes. Take it slow, ask questions, and we'll re-visit the issue in 2 months. Primefac (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Please list the conversations so that I can check again and improve myself. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 06:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Printed Rainbow, Talk:Red_Dead_Redemption_2#Ubl, Talk:Venom_(2018_film)#Antihero, and the whole thing with File:October Official Poster.jpeg. None of these discussions individually are really all that serious (and for the most part you are civil in them). I suppose "argument" was too strong a word (amended above), but a lot of angry/upset newbies come through AFC and sometimes it feels like you're just banging your head against the wall trying to make them figure out our guidelines. Primefac (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: 1. Talk:Printed Rainbow#Content removal: I was a noob here back then and didn't knew much about policies of inclusion of content here. So this was a total noob nonsense from my side. Though the information I had provided there is absolutely correct but what can I do if does not exist in reliable sources? Therefore, I dropped the conversation. 2. Talk:Red Dead Redemption 2#Ubl: I just wanted to concise the source code but he didn't want to, therefore I dropped the conversation. All he did was back up himself with WP:STATUSQUO and say that redirects doesn't help but the fact is that anybody didn't take offense on that. Redirects are the backbone of all the wikis. Maybe someday he will understand. 3. Talk:Venom (2018 film)#Antihero: Please watch the second official trailer of the film and you will understand why I wanted that word to be in the lead but they didn't want to, therefore I dropped the conversation. Some users just don't want to except noob's opinions. 4. File:October (2018 film).jpeg: Krimuk2.0 was forcing some other kind of poster but I was just defending the old one. He was saying that I should listen to him just because he was an experienced editor. I don't believe such claims. No one is too much experienced in this world. Let me give you a fresh example from current affairs and maybe you too will wonder. Read this. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since you pinged me here (for whatever reason), I read your above statement regarding the discussion involving myself and I believe you still haven't understood how discussions and consensus work here. I used STATUSQUO (and sadly I had to do so far too frequent) to make you seek consensus for your change, since apparently you found the miniscule change important enough to edit war about it. After you at least tried to seek consensus by posting on the talk page with multiple people stating that the change is useless and not futureproof, you went ahead stating that no clear consensus has been reached (although consensus to not change was there), and used it as confirmation for you to go ahead and re-insert your edits. Even if there was no consensus, default is always retain. Plus, I was not required to achieve consensus to retain and provide a reasoning for that if others already told you not to change it. Yet, i later did (adding on top of Masem's previous technical explanation), but somehow that is missing from your above points. Following a second pageblock (both of which I had to ask for), we were warned by @Amorymeltzer to not edit war again or be blocked, yet you did it again and again and were reverted by a different user yet again. If Amory had noticed you continuing to edit war past his warnings, you would have certainly been blocked. You didn't drop the conversation because you accepted my opinion, but because you were at or over the edge of being blocked. You are deliberatly lying about topics, badmouthing other editors like me, @Winged Blades of Godric, GSS-1987, and Adamstom.97 so to make it appear as if you concluded discussions in good faith, which is not the case in most, if not all of these discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 10:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really want to get involved, but it looks to me that this editor hasn't really learned anything from the issues that have been brought up here, including the one that I was involved in. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AntanO[edit]

AntanO (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to contribute to AfC since there are some hundreds of articles in draft stage. I am fully aware of review and Wiki guidance. I'd review drafts where I have knowledge. Antan O 04:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheGridExe[edit]

TheGridExe (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm interested with the project especially as a long time editor. I have recently been involved with delsort AfD, PROD, and CSD. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ask for npp at perm if you didn't Quek157 (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nosebagbear[edit]

Nosebagbear (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to put myself forward to have access to the rights so I can work on getting in some of the articles in the queue that deserve it, particularly with ACPERM now in so presumably with a bigger submission rate.

I have the base 500 article edits - this is a general mix of gnome edits, content edition, some picture selection and addition as well as a fairly recent participation in rolling back vandal edits in recent changes.

I also participate actively at AfD, which has given me a fairly in depth training in the various specialist notability policies, as well as making me a firm believer in having another look at them if at all unsure on a consideration.

I'm aware I'm only just over the 500 mainspace edit criteria, so if you want me to hold back for a bit, any other suggestions on focus, etc, at the same time would be appreciated. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nosebagbear, I'm curious about the statement at the bottom of your userpage that indicates you are what some people would call a "hard core" inclusionist. Given that determining notability is one of the main tasks of AFC, how would you justify these two seemingly disparate views? Primefac (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: - that is somewhat an indication of my earlier (as in, half a decade) rather aggressive viewpoint on the issue. While I would definitely still be somewhat on the inclusionist viewpoint, "hardcore inclusionist" would definitely be somewhat out of sync both with my judgement and also my AfD voting record (about 37% keep). I try, and hope that I succeed, to be very energetic at not letting my preferences on an issue prevent me from judging the evidence. The AfD for Operation Market Sweep that began yesterday I would much prefer to be Keep. But none of the sources and arguments for that actually support it (to the degree I can see thus far).

If nothing else, the afc-request gives me a reminder that I need to actually make sure my userpage properly represents my views. I'll leave it as-is while the process is ongoing, however. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your reply. Primefac (talk) 16:59, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user:Lionelt[edit]

Lionelt (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi I'm interested in reviewing new articles. I've promoted several pages to Featured, 3 GAs, about 25 DYKs per QPQ, which means I've reviewed about 20 DYKs, rescued 4 articles, 42 articles created only 3 deleted.– Lionel^(talk) 05:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hellknowz[edit]

Hellknowz (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I didn't realize how bad the AfC backlog is, so I'd like to help out if time permits. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 21:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It's half the size it was a month ago, but we'll always welcome more assistance! Primefac (talk) 21:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AvalerionV[edit]

AvalerionV (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been here for more than a year and over 9,000 edits. I'd like to contribute again so willing to participate. Dawood Khan 19:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. I appreciate the willingness to help, but you have almost no page creation experience or editing in the "maintenance" side of Wikipedia, which means that there is no demonstration that you know and understand Wikipedia's inclusion policies. Primefac (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amitchell125[edit]

Amitchell125 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help with the backlog, I think I would be able to do a good job doing it. Hel-hama 21:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Probationary (2 months) - I see a fair number of GAs under your belt, and some decent content creation, but not a lot in the way of the deletion side of things. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June[edit]

User:Ajpolino[edit]

Ajpolino (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I'm an occasional NPP reviewer. The recent ACT permanent implementation and the draft discussions listed at WP:CENT piqued my interest in drafts. I'm happy to help out here and review a few drafts a week, especially any related to biology. Ajpolino (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lonehexagon[edit]

Lonehexagon (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help improve potential new articles and help new users understand the notability requirements. I believe a good AFC experience would encourage new users to keep editing, even if their article ends up getting deleted. I would also like to help new users understand how to find reliable, independent sources. I have created and improved many articles, and have extensive experience with AFDs. I understand the notability requirements. I would take this responsibility seriously and strictly follow all guidelines. I would not approve articles if there's any question of notability. I enjoy improving articles and working with new users, which I think would be beneficial in this role. Lonehexagon (talk) 04:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:RetroCraft314[edit]

RetroCraft314 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia but I wanted to help out with the backlog. I review the New Page Feed every once in a while and I've participated in a handful of AfDs. I also help to revert vandalism and have rollback perms (which doesn't mean much, I know). <RetroCraft314 talk/> 21:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nanophosis[edit]

Nanophosis (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm a new edit reviewer and rollbacker, but one of my favorite things to do is review and create new pages. Note that I just created a redirect from redirects for creation without thinking about coming here first, so I apologize for not being on the list of active reviewers beforehand. Thank you, Nanophosis (talk) 14:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:In Memoriam A.H.H.[edit]

In Memoriam A.H.H. (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Apologies if I am seen as a hat collecter. As that is not my intention. I have written 7 Start-class articles, including A Short Vision, and I also am a Pending Changes reviewer. I know I applied here a few months ago. However, I have read the criteria now, and now fully understand it. And, I would also be happy to review the backlog of pages, and to help new users as well with writing their first articles. Thank you. In Memoriam A.H.H.^{What, you egg?}. 18:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probationary - 2 months. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Basie[edit]

Basie (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello. I'd like to help out with the backlog, even though it seems to have shrunk! Returning from an extended wikibreak, and was asked to wait on applying for NPP to demonstrate activity (fair enough). I'm pretty good with new editors, have some experience (several years back) doing copyvio work, and try to participate in AfD particularly around projects I'm editing in. Basie (talk) 06:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probationary - 2 months. This is due to the long absence you've accumulated from 2014-2017 (having only done ~250 edits in 2018), over which time our guidelines have changed rather significantly. Please make sure to ask questions if you have any. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be sure to, thanks! Basie (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:LeoFrank[edit]

LeoFrank (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've been a NPP for a while now and also have the NPP rights. Would like to be added to the participants list in order to review any drafts which are within my areas of interest. Thanks you — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Godsy[edit]

Godsy (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I handle a lot of drafts because of my participation at MfD and due to monitoring Category:Promising draft articles. Access to the functionality of the AfC helper script would expedite leaving the occasional {{afc comment}} etc. I already have the new page reviewer user right and meet all the criteria outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 17:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I know I don't have to remind you, but for posterity don't forget your IBAN. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Basilosauridae[edit]

Basilosauridae (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi all, I would love to help out. I do my best to interpret wikipedia guidelines and policies fairly, and when I'm not sure I generally request input and collaboration from other editors. ^†Basilosauridae ❯❯❯Talk 18:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheSubmarine[edit]

TheSubmarine (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help out with the backlog. I have read and understand the reviewing instructions. When I do not understand something, I ask clarification from other editors to make sure what I am doing is right. Thank you. TheSubmarine (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probationary - 2 months. Primefac (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Strikerforce[edit]

Strikerforce (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Happy to participate to help clear the backlog, as time permits. Strikerforce^Talk 18:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC) Strikerforce^Talk 18:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SmokeyJoe[edit]

SmokeyJoe (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am an occasional NPP reviewer, extensive experience with notability and deletion policy and recent critic and attempted constructive-critic of the AfC processes. I am in need of experience and am interested in doing some AfC reviewing. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Firefly[edit]

Firefly (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Volunteering to assist in clearing the backlog. I have a good handle on deletion policy & what constitutes notability, reliable sources, etc, and do RC and new-page patrol when I have time. ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 02:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yeenosaurus[edit]

Yeenosaurus (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Use the script to review mostly obvious ones to help clear the backlog, but can deal with more advanced cases if needed, as I'm experienced in NPP. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 05:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abelmoschus Esculentus[edit]

Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am interested in reviewing AFC submissions and help clear the backlog. You may wish to check here too ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 14:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation - 2 months. Primefac (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July[edit]

User:KCVelaga[edit]

KCVelaga (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've recently changed my username to "KCVelaga" from "Krishna Chaitanya Velaga" Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Etzedek24[edit]

Etzedek24 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Been fairly active since October, spent some time at AFD and done work with CSD, BLP, and article quality ratings. Seeing if it's time, if not, let me know where to improve. Etzedek24 ^{(Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?)} 17:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note User has recently had a request for New Page Patroller declined. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify: In reality I should have withdrawn the NPP as I intended to post here. Not trying to collect hats. Etzedek24 ^{(Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?)} 21:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR has been accorded on 3 month probation. User describes themselves as a 'hardcore inclusionist'. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Transclude from NPR page: Inclusionist userbox was not created by me, I put it on user page when I began editing and have since removed it as I have gained familiarity with the website and my views have evolved. Etzedek24 ^{(Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?)} 02:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. I think I'm seeing the same things that were seen at the NPR request. Primefac (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:BrandonALF[edit]

BrandonALF (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to become a AfC reviewer. Seams likes something I'd be good at. I also like to contribute to Wikipedia more this way. I see there's a long backlog. And overtime I've learned how to make article worthy for Wikipedia.

— BrandonALF ^(talk) 23:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Not bloody likely with that mess of a signature. Nick (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Sig has been changed. Primefac (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question: How does having a signature that one dislikes relate to the ability to accept or decline drafts?--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't, and I don't think anyone was really going to take it into account. The notice would have been better left at the user's talk page (which I did, not seeing this comment first). Primefac (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We've got the signature policy/guideline which BrandonALF clearly hasn't read or has decided to not follow - that calls into question their ability to follow important policies and guidelines like WP:BLP, WP:CORP, WP:N etc when reviewing a draft article. Nick (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin and I'm not saying the Brandon necessarily should become an AfC reviewer, but imo their sig shouldn't count that much against them. There are so many policies on Wikipedia that somebody may miss a few sometimes, and this particular one has nothing to do with AfC reviewing - what would be more concerning is if BrandonALF refused to change their sig after being told to.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 17:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There are just too many issues here to make me feel comfortable accepting you into this project. Your AFD record is subpar, half the pages you've created have been deleted for one reason or another, and on the technical side of things it looks like there have been some major issues with not paying attention to what you were doing when you were editing templates. Primefac (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:A loose noose[edit]

A loose noose (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I meet the technical requirements for a AfC reviewer, and I understand there is a backlog right now of over 1500 articles (?!!). I've written several articles of my own, and I have now thoroughly read over the AfC reviewing instructions. I will be glad to defer to my more experienced comrades and to consult with them in those instances where I have doubts about a given draft article: I grasp that AfC must be done correctly, and am interested in sharing my knowledge as an editor with those who have shown that they are wiling to offer their work for review. A loose noose (talk) 00:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, does not meet minimum editing requirements, and the AFD log is rather distressing and shows a lack of understanding of the notability criteria. Primefac (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then, just so I know: what requirement am I not meeting yet? (I have over 500 edits and have passed the 90-day test). Also, it looks like my request got to you on an off day: it looks like you usually either accept or offer probationary acceptance to applicants, but decided flat-out against three of us in a row today. Was it... maybe not us?? (I wonder... If I had never done AfD, would you have viewed my request more favorably? AfD is always hit-or-miss, and I believe I showed some initiative by at least putting my hand at play, please do not punish me for trying to explore or learn). — Preceding unsigned comment added by A loose noose (talk • contribs) 09:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't even manage to sign your post here. I would suggest taking the comments Primefac left entirely at face value, gain more experience and come back in a few months time. A bad review is considerably more problematic than no review at all, it is important reviews are conducted correctly and I don't think you're just quite at the level where I'd trust you to make good reviews >90% of the time. Nick (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the edit question - it's 500 article-space edits, not 500 total. And no, you did not catch me on an off day; one of the requirements is a demonstration that you understand notability criteria, and a <50% "success" rate at AFD shows that this is not the case for you. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeromi Mikhael[edit]

Jeromi Mikhael (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) }}

I would like to help for the new article drafts to be submitted as an article. I have understand about copyvios, in which recently I have been warned about the copyvios on my article. I have understand about WP:NOT and WP:COPYVIO since then. I have understand about WP:IBA, which is exactly what happened on this draft. I am also interested to repair drafts that lacks reference. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 06:33, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, the past (though relatively recent) problems you've had with sourcing and copyrights, and lack of experience in the administrative side of Wikipedia, makes me believe you're not quite ready yet. Primefac (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AvalerionV[edit]

AvalerionV (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I was denied before for not having page creation experience and to re-apply again later. I am still interested in the position so I am applying again. Thank you. AvalerionV 12:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done; same issues as last time, namely the fact that the vast majority of your edits are just gnoming. One of your drafts hasn't been approved, and I don't see much in the way of demonstration that you know the criteria well (i.e. via XFD, CSD, etc). (First request) Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hunterm267[edit]

Hunterm267 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello! I'm a fairly experienced anti-vandalism WP:GNOME, who has recently spent considerable time reviewing WP:AFDs as well. I consider myself quite familiar with (and always trying to learn more about) the notability policies, and would like to help reduce the backlog of AFC entries. In fact, I installed the script and reviewed two articles before realizing I was supposed to start here - please forgive me! HunterM267 ^talk 18:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate on my accidental usage of the AFC script prior to posting here, I had reviewed the pages for getting started, including this page, which outlined the processes - primarily installing the script. I had done so, found the script to work, and later added the participation userbox to my user page. After reviewing the participants section, I found that a formal request to join is necessary, and here I am! --HunterM267 ^talk 18:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The script is supposed to be designed so that even if it is installed, it doesn't work unless your name is on the list of participants. I'm guessing it has something to do with this bug? Anyways, it looks like you made the right choice for the two drafts you declined, so I wouldn't worry about it. :)--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 18:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:IntoThinAir[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I recently had my account renamed from Everymorning to IntoThinAir, so the link to my old username on this page needs to be replaced with one to my new username. Thanks. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 18:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iffy[edit]

Iffy (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I'd like to help out with the AFC backlog. I meet all of the criteria and have read the reviewing instructions. Iffy★Chat -- 11:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Septrillion[edit]

Septrillion (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been around for some time, appear to meet all the criteria, with AfD experience this time, and would like to help with the backlog. Since my last request I have learned to take care when using tools such as rollback and CSD. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 21:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn (in previous edit). Primefac (talk) 14:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Snowycats[edit]

Snowycats (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I meet all of the criteria successfully and have reviewed the instructions. I have worked with editors on a 1-on-1 basis in IRC and inside -help. I've also responded to "help me" requests and assisted other users. I would like to help with the backlog here at AfC and feel that I would be successful in doing so. Snowycats (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, indeffed. Primefac (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: My indef was a CU error. The Arbitration Committee has removed my block. Snowycats (talk) 19:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tabuhart[edit]

Tabuhart (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi, I would like to be made a reviewer so I can widen my contribution with reviewing other articles. Thank you! Tabuhart (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, sock. Primefac (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Newslinger[edit]

Newslinger (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello. I've studied the reviewing instructions, and I'm volunteering to help attend to the backlog of AfC submissions. After participating in AfD discussions, I've learned the nuances of the notability requirements, and I'm ready to evaluate new articles by the same standards. When I review an article, I'll promptly respond to all questions from the submitter. Thanks for your consideration. — Newslinger talk 17:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Duke of Nonsense[edit]

The Duke of Nonsense (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I know that I have AFC rights, but when I was granted them, I was told it was probationary for 2 months. Those months are nearly up, so I am requesting that I be allowed to use the script indefinitely. Thanks. The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?}. 21:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will be putting this up to the community shortly (original request). Primefac (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SamHolt6[edit]

SamHolt6 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I would like to be added to the list of active participants. I am a fairly frequent New Page Patroller, an active page mover (with page mover rights), autopatrolled status, and have participated in several hundred AfDs. I have just crossed my 18K edit mark without any major incidents, and have myself created just under two hundred articles. My experiences with NPP, AfD, and article creation have left me with (I hope) an in-depth grasp of Wikipedia's policies on notability, WP:MOS, and article creation in general. I believe I can be of help in reducing the project's backlog. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Piotrus[edit]

Piotrus (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I like doing many things, and I can occasionally want to review an AfC. I've more then enough edits, and I am pretty well versed in WP:N. Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August[edit]

User:Jessamyn[edit]

Jessamyn (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hi -- I'd like to help with the backlog and get to know more about this process so I can help new editors understand more facets of it. Iv'e read the rules and understand them. Thanks for your time! Jessamyn (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Jessamyn (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SportingFlyer[edit]

SportingFlyer (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've become familiar with the way of creating an article through draft and then moving it into mainspace. I understand notability requirements and would like to help with the backlog. SportingFlyer talk 12:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is mainly due to the lack of recent edits (only 291 in the last year, and barely 100 in the preceding 3 years). Primefac (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Catrìona[edit]

Catrìona (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I have about 4,000 mainspace edits. So far, I have made one good article (Prague uprising) and one that's up for review (Bratislava Working Group) so I have some experience with content creation. Recently, I have started getting involved in AfD with some success, so I have some idea of notability concerns, but I will ask for a second opinion if there's any doubt. I voluntarily draftified one of my own creations (Draft:Reidio Guth nan Gàidheal) when I realized that it did not meet the notability criteria, and nominated an article that I created for deletion (Participants in the Prague uprising) because it was a duplication of an existing article. I have also made a few reviews at DYK and have one DYK credit, for Bratislava Working Group. I'm friendly to new users and happy to answer questions. For these reasons, I think I'll be a net positive here. I've read and understand the directions. Catrìona (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:KJP1[edit]

Please remove me from the list of approved Afc'ers. KJP1 (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You're welcome back any time. Primefac (talk) 22:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think not. KJP1 (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you change your mind, just let us know. Primefac (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And if you reflect a little on the behaviors/content you're supporting, just let me know. KJP1 (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nauriya[edit]

Nauriya (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Please approve my request, there are lots of articles that I think needs my help in assisting. And after five years of editing I think I can help new editors in creating articles, assisting them in understanding the rules of wikipedia and this will also give me a right to move the drafts to articles mainspace only and only if they meet all the requirements of a stand alone article. Nauriya, Let's talk - 22:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abesam[edit]

Abesam (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Wikipedian for 9 years. Will help me create good quality articles. Abesam (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abesam, you know this project isn't for creating new articles, it's for reviewing them, right? Primefac (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I meant making good articles. Abesam (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kpgjhpjm[edit]

Kpgjhpjm (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I want to participate in the project to help new users to create new articles and reduce the backlog . I can confirm that I have thoroughly read the reviewing instructions . If anybody has any issues with my editing please let me know . Thanks Kpg jhp jm 04:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kendrick7[edit]

Kendrick7 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Was asked to help. -- Kendrick7^talk 02:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Kendrick7^talk 02:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kendrick7, quite frankly I'm a bit concerned about your previous BLP issues. I also don't see on your talk page where you were asked to help. Why do you want to join AFC? Primefac (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you have a huge backlog? -- Kendrick7^talk 17:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but this isn't an issue to be solved with a bulldozer. I personally could probably do 100 reviews in the next hour, but they would be incredibly bad reviews and would do nothing towards the advancement of the project. There are reasons we have criteria for joining the project, mainly to do with editors who do not understand what we're looking for in a good draft. I'm not saying that you are one of those editors, but I do see a lot of concerns expressed on your talk page and with your previous editing. Primefac (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac here is the diff where he is requested to move an article to draft space to circumvent AfC and here is the result. Aside from that, I'm concerned for similar reasons as Primefac and also because I'm not sure you're familiar with the ever-changing policies and consensus regarding notability given the very little participation in the last two years and virtually no afd participation in as long and prior afds were not at all aligned with consensus. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kitchen roll[edit]

Kitchen roll (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've been a Wikipedian for 10 years on and off. I have contributed to three good articles and reviewed two, as well as creating several well established ones. I've read the reviewing instructions carefully and wish to help out this WikiProject and reduce the backlog. Thanks Kitchen Roll (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. The bulk of your experience was pre-2010, and you have <200 edits since 2015. I'd like to see a bit more consistent activity before granting access. Primefac (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yanjipy[edit]

Yanjipy (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have read the criteria for becoming a member for this WikiProject and I think I meet all requirements. I like to peer review articles and sometimes revert vandalism. As you can see from my contributions I have a history of improving articles and assessing them as well. I also like to collaborate with other Wikipedians to better improve the site. Althogh I have been blocked once for disruptive editing, since then, I have took my time to better know Wikipedia and it's guidelines and

to learn from my mistakes. Anything, I'll be glad to help with. Yanjipy (talk) 20:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You do not meet the minimum requirements as you only have 327 mainspace edits. You also just recently came off an idef block for CIR;the unblocking conditions included you getting a mentor. Have you consulted with your mentor about this? John from Idegon (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I withdraw from this application. Sorry, apparently I read 500 edits not mainspace edits. Yanjipy (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theredproject[edit]

Theredproject (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I periodically find myself working on Drafts that have already been submitted for review, like this one: Draft:Carl & Marilynn Thoma Art Foundation. Rather than moving the page, and removing the templating stuff manually I figure it is better to do it w/ the tools. I have read the instructions. I am mostly/only editing in the Visual Arts space, and I am active at AFD in the arts, where the tool shows I vote with consensus ~95% of the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theredproject (talk • contribs) 22:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September[edit]

User:Bennv3771[edit]

Bennv3771 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help out at AfC. I've read the reviewing instructions and have experience in NPR and article creation. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Bennv3771 (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done TonyBallioni (talk) 15:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:PrussianOwl[edit]

PrussianOwl (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I was on the list before, but I changed my name from "Jjjjjjdddddd" to "PrussianOwl". PrussianOwl (talk) 20:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done and thanks for the name change

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no problem! PrussianOwl (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Knightrises10[edit]

Knightrises10 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have read the policies. I want to help Wikipedia with the backlog. I am confident that I will only review for the betterment of this project. Although I have still a few edits less than 500, I can assure you that I have learned a lot about the notability guidelines.

Regards, Knightrises10 (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done based on my interactions with you yesterday, I think you are too new and don't have a strong enough grasp of our policies to be giving advice to new editors yourself. I suggest you spend some more time in mainspace before contributing to maintenance processes. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yanjipy[edit]

Yanjipy (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello, I've recently applied to be a member for this WikiProject but I withdrew from the application after John from Idegon reminded me that 500 edits meant 500 main space edits. Ever since then, I've been working on the RTRC and helping unregistered users with their drafts. Sometimes putting useful tags, fixing their grammars and welcoming them to Wikipedia. After Abelmoschus Esculentus invited me to participate in this WikiProject, I gladly accepted the invitation and went ahead to reread the instructions and other guidelines for this WikiProject. Now, I understand that I have been blocked for disruptive editing when I had just started to edit Wikipedia but ever since, I've gotten myself a mentor and greatly improved my editing skills. I look forward into hopefully achieving membership at this WikiProject. Yanjipy (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yanjipy: Oh I didn't know that you have applied for this before! —AE (talk • contributions) 14:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abelmoschus Esculentus: I did when I didn't meet the minimal requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanjipy (talk • contribs) 14:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Felicia777[edit]

Felicia777 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have experience in the articles and since I'm a pending changes reviewer, I think I am a good person for the work, I have all the requirements for being a member. I also have a question, does reverting vandalism count as a mainspace contribution? Felicia (talk) 22:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and yes. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barkeep49[edit]

Barkeep49 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am an experienced new page patroller. With the upcoming merging of the feeds I would like the ability to work on these articles if the mood strikes me. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gpkp[edit]

Gpkp (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello. Making a request to join. Thank you. Gpkp (u • t • c) 13:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thine Antique Pen[edit]

Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I was recently asked to help on my talk page and had already been considering helping to alleviate the backlog here. While I haven't been the most active over the last couple of years, I have experience patrolling new pages and my main area of interest would be dealing with submissions containing copyright violations. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Flooded with them hundreds[edit]

Flooded with them hundreds (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Username changed from Z0. The editor whose username is Z0 18:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 18:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pythoncoder[edit]

Pythoncoder (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Would like to help reduce the backlog. I read the rules. I’ve been manually IAR-declining obviously bad submissions (those which would obviously get speedied), but I feel that the script would make this easier and make me less likely to screw something up. pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is mainly due to the high percentage of AFD mismatches. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Frayae[edit]

Frayae (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I meet the minimum requirements, I have read the instructions, and I would like to help reviewing drafts. As practice I have been periodically moving pages out of Category:Pending AfC submissions in userspace and Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space through the use of the draftify tool, the move to draft tool and speedy deletion where appropriate. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SemiHypercube[edit]

SemiHypercube (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am applying for AfC because I want to try to help clear the backlog of submissions. I meet the requirements, have read the instructions. I have already CSD'd bad submissions for some time, so I have some experience in this area. ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 19:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eddie891[edit]

Eddie891 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help with the backlog.

NB that I previously was an AfC reviewer, but voluntarily left the project because of my inexperience. I am now far more knowledgeable and experienced, including being a new page patroller. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JaconaFrere[edit]

JaconaFrere (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I noticed an AfC a long time ago that should be accepted, then noticed it's still out there more than a month later. I would like to help by removing an AFC or two out of the backlog.Jacona (talk) 10:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Jacona (talk) 10:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schwartzenberg[edit]

Schwartzenberg (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Hello. I used to help with Articles for creation and I would like to start helping again. I have read the rules and understand the rules. Thank you. 22:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Schwartzenberg (talk)

Not done. AFC has changed quite a lot in the last four years, and our criteria have changed significantly since then (including a 500-article-space-edit minimum requirement). You're welcome to reapply when you've been back for a bit longer. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeromeenriquez[edit]

Jeromeenriquez (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I read the guidelines, and i understand it, and i think and hope that i meet the requirements. Please consider. Regards. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, mostly based on the large number of declined drafts you've submitted recently. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Knightrises10[edit]

Knightrises10 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm currently working with Barkeep49 to get trained for reviewing, and have learned pretty much. So as an Afc reviewer, I can help to play my small part in reducing the backlog,and will also continue to learn more from Barkeep49. Knightrises10 (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC) Knightrises10 (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just confirming that Knightrises and I are working together. Has a strong overall sense of notability. Before encouraging him to make this request I checked with TonyBallioni who had denied a request earlier in the month. His response affirmed Knightrises could apply again. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: take note of this. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:32, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October[edit]

User:LittlePuppers[edit]

LittlePuppers (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm interested in helping with AfC and reducing the backlog. I've reviewed the instructions, I believe I meet the criteria, and I'm familiar with most Wikipedia policies. LittlePuppers (talk) 16:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Imersion[edit]

Imersion (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to review articles.

Imersion (talk) 23:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is no indication that you have much (if any) experience on the "administrative" side of the project, i.e. there is no demonstrated understanding of the policies mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various special notability categories. Primefac (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So how do I demonstrate that? Doesn't seem like a very important issue. Notability s pretty simple. Imersion (talk) 00:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) - as well as notability (source consideration can be surprisingly complicated in some judgement calls), AfC reviewing involves quite a few aspects (copyright, NPOV etc), having a look at our reviewing instructions is worthwhile. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest turning on your CSD log and Twinkle in Preferences. Than start learning how to tag spam and other junk for speedy deletion (in AfC and elsewhere). You can also look at AfC submissions and try to improve the good ones. Fix titles, set up Reflist, move pages from userspace to Draft, bold the article name in the first sentence. Such activity is very helpful to making AfC run smoothly, assisting new editors, and building an understanding of what does and does not fly here. Thanks for your willingness to help. User:Imersion Legacypac (talk) 07:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Daviddwd[edit]

Daviddwd (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I would like to get involved in article review Daviddwd (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You seem to have got active only over the course of the last months after a long span of inactivity, which does not instill confidence about your awareness of the various changes to our policies and guidelines.You are yet to participate in any AfD and I have no way to assess your standards of notability et al.Furthermore, I do not see any interaction with other editors at any venue, which would impress me about your communication skills. ∯WBG^converse 03:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SportingFlyer[edit]

SportingFlyer (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have had probationary rights for two months now. In that time I have actively participated in the AfC process and have contributed several hundred edits in draft space. I still need to work more on getting mainspace edits up as I've mostly been focused on procedure in the past few months, but I would like to continue to be able to review articles at AfC, especially as the backlog has grown. SportingFlyer talk 01:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC) SportingFlyer talk 01:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Consider this as being confirmed for now. Thanks for volunteering. Lourdes 06:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Grid[edit]

The Grid (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Username was changed from User:TheGridExe. Adding as a request to document. – The Grid (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lourdes 06:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clarityfiend[edit]

Clarityfiend (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Commenters on the ~~talk page~~ help desk have complained recently about the backlog, so I might as well lend a hand. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. +rollbacker and newpagereviewer for support. Thanks for volunteering. Lourdes 06:02, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Funplussmart[edit]

Funplussmart (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I know that there is a huge backlog in AFC right now and I'd like to help out. I already have Rollback and Pending Changes, and I have read the reviewing instructions and know the notability and BLP guidelines. funplussmart (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know enough of all of Wikipedia's policies to help out. funplussmart (talk) 12:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 AfDs, not much to evaluate from but among that this was pretty bad and this shows a failure at looking for alternatives to deletion.There are instances of pathetic CSD-tagging and ~~4 days back, you were requesting A7 on a draft~~.A PROD doesn't apply on Eduardo Bayo for the exact reasons mentioned by DGG and if anything, a BLPPROD would have been far optimum.And, as I crawl through your contributions I see a lot of vandal-fighting, AIV, UAA and all that stuff but no efforts at writing something.On an appreciative note, your response to Amanda's NPP-decline and your conduct around the locus of JzG's userspace-stuff, makes me think that you have a good communication style, which is very desirable, as to AfC. ∯WBG^converse 12:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That page was draftified after I placed the A7 tag. And a lot of that pathetic CSD tagging was from a while ago. I figured things out pretty quickly. But I understand your concerns. funplussmart (talk) 14:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And about Eduardo Bayo, the reason why I did not use BLPPROD was because the article contained an external link to a google page or something, but now I realize that is not a source at all (not just unreliable). funplussmart (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn. Primefac (talk) 23:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:K.e.coffman[edit]

K.e.coffman (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm interested in contributing in the AfC area. I have good grasp of notability and other guidelines, having created about 100 articles and being active at AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A very competent editor who will make a great addition here. Legacypac (talk) 01:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done also gave NPR for good measure. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Frederika Eilers[edit]

Frederika Eilers (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I applied a couple years ago, I finally have over 500 edits and I have created a handful of biography articles myself. As my record shows I am not especially active, but I am a long time member of a couple wikipedia projects, including WP:Women in Red. Thank you for your time in reviewing my request to join the AFC reviewers. Fred (talk) 16:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails to meet the 500 article-space edit requirement. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JC7V7DC5768[edit]

JC7V7DC5768 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I want to become a AFC reviewer to help clear the backlog and I meet all of the criteria. I have spent a lot of time reading the AFC reviewing instructions and I feel I would do a great job. I also have CSD'd a fair amount of bad drafts (copyright, spam). Thank you for your consideration. JC7V-constructive zone 17:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dreamy Jazz[edit]

Dreamy Jazz (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to lend a hand at AfC. I have read the reviewing instructions and relevant guidelines. I have had experience in combating vandalism and reviewing pending changes. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Giantflightlessbirds[edit]

Giantflightlessbirds (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help at AfC. I'm involved with enough events where new users create articles that it would be good to be able to quickly review their drafts. I've had a reasonable amount of experience creating and editing articles and running Wikipedia tutorials. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:29, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Plandu[edit]

Plandu (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've just started looking to improve draft pages, and would love to be able to review them. I'd love to get the AfC wait time down as low as possible. I have plenty of edit experience. Plandu (talk) 02:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hobit[edit]

Hobit (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have a solid grasp of our inclusion rules and have read the AfC directions. Hobit (talk) 23:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done + added the new page reviewer (and rollbacker) bits for added support. Thanks, Lourdes 07:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TAnthony[edit]

TAnthony (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm a veteran editor who has created and improved countless articles, including bringing a few to Good status. Not sure why I haven't sought to participate here before! — TAnthony^Talk 01:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done + added the new page reviewer bit for added support. Thanks, Lourdes 07:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nathan2055[edit]

Nathan2055 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'm a previous reviewer and script developer from several years back returning from an extended break, requesting to be moved back to the active list so I can begin reviewing submissions again. I also don't have new page reviewer (which is apparently a separate user right now, which gives you an idea of how long I've been gone), which would probably also be beneficial for reviewing. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nathan2055, hope you're well. It's just been a month since you've been back. Would you want to perhaps get a month or two more of experience around Wikipedia's main-space and boards like Afd etcetera before plunging into Afc, which also has changed significantly since the last time you were here? You could perhaps re-apply here in a month or two? I'll leave it to you. Warmly, Lourdes 02:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lourdes: That certainly seems reasonable, there do appear to have been a number of significant policy changes that it would be good to get acquainted with. I'll reapply in a month or so after getting some experience elsewhere. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to it. Primefac (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done (adding tag for archiving purposes), Lourdes 23:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kb03[edit]

Kb03 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been doing anti-vandal work for a while with rollback and would like to expand what I do. AfC has piqued my interest and I would love to help clear the backlog. I have read and will follow the policies listed. Kb03 (talk) 00:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kb03, while you've been here for many years, you've only been active for the past two months, and have just about crossed 500 edits in the main space. I've also noticed your recent rollback edits like this where you've subsequently warned the IP editor of making changes without providing reliable sources (when the source was right there at the end of the sentence). I would suggest that you could for a couple of months more continue editing across our article space without committing such errors, maybe get experience across other desks dealing with article editing/deletion, and perhaps also get acquainted with the changes in our policies and guidelines. Perhaps you could reapply after that, which might give us more confidence in your assessment capabilities. Warmly, Lourdes 10:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I concur with Lourdes on this one - while you've had an account for a few years now, you've effectively only been editing for two months. I'd also like to see more "back-end" work to demonstrate you know and understand the notability/verifiability rules. Primefac (talk) 17:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vinodbasker[edit]

Vinodbasker (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I am very much interested in becoming a part of this project and thereby reducing the huge backlog we currently have. I believe I meet the criteria and I have spend a lot of time reading AFC reviewing instructions. I am also active at Afd discussions. Vinodbasker (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little concerned with your recent creations - two of which have been moved to the draft space for continued work and one deleted at AFD. I'd like to see a bit stronger track record before you start reviewing other people's drafts. Additionally, I'm seeing big no-no's like using IMDb as a reference in other articles you've written. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:HighKing[edit]

HighKing (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

After being fairly active at AfD for the past while, it was suggested to me that I might also be able to help out at AfC. I tend to stick to articles on corporations/organizations but I occasionally look at other categories. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is an inexhastable supply of corp/org pages to review at AfC. You can start by browsing and G11ing Corp spam in the que. Legacypac (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I was reviewing Draft:The Hustle (Media Company) but realised I didn't have access to the AFCH tools, leading me to here. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm ... not a lot I can do (efficiently) without the tools. Also Legacypac, is there a category/page set up that only shows the Corp entries? HighKing⁺⁺ 11:14, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can use Twinkle to CSD pages and you can add comments. You can also accept and move pages manually - just take off the AfC tags when you move a page. If you look at the titles it is pretty clear what are orgs and what are bios. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Legacypac. Yup, I'm aware that I can do all that manually (and have done in the past) and I'm familiar with Twinkle, but far easier to use the AFCH tools - less mistakes, more efficient, etc. I was also hoping/asking if something like [1] this type of page existed at AfC. I find it helpful for AfD. If not, fine - as you say, most of the time it is obvious by the name. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac, if you have no objections, I propose adding HighKing to the AfC participants' list. Lourdes 23:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I also gave you WP:NPR. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was just commenting not objecting at all. Welcome to the team! Legacypac (talk) 02:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:HighKing the article alerts you linked is possible because pages are tagged for wikiproject Companies. Very few Drafts are tagged for Wikiprojects by time we review them so that type of alert would not work well. Legacypac (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Che12Guevara[edit]

Che12Guevara (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I want to be a part of WikiProject AfC. I have read the guidelines and I meet the required criteria. I want to reduce the huge backlog we currently have. I have also created some Wikipedia articles. I am also a organizer at Wikipedia Asia Month in Bangla Wikipedia. Che (Talkin' Bout A Revolution) 07:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Che12Guevara, thanks for applying. You have a respectable article creation list. No standout red flags. However, in the last six months, you have made only around 11 edits to main space and have been fairly inactive. Would you want to contribute a bit more in the next couple of months and re-apply in say January when we can see at least two months' of recent activity? Thanks, Lourdes 00:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lourdes, Yes, I'll again apply in January. Thanks for your suggestion. Che (Talkin' Bout A Revolution) 14:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done (marking for archiving purposes), Lourdes 22:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jovanmilic97[edit]

Jovanmilic97 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

After getting to know things around AfDs with being very active there right now and learning a lot about guidelines, AfC peaked my interest because it is a new thing to be actually not only helping but also reviewing drafts we have, while trying to reduce that big list of now very old Draft submissions which have not been reviewed by anyone (helping things around on this beautiful site is the least I can do as my thanks to the history of Wikipedia). I meet all the criteria that is required. Thanks in advance. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user became very active in October after only minor activity over many years. They have over 500 mainspace edits and some AfD experience. Only a couple article creations but that is not a big deal. I'd encourage this user to do some CSD work to better prepare for the junk we see at AfC. They can start on the AfC pending list and CSD out SPAM Legacypac (talk) 23:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: @Lourdes: Thanks for the discussion, I have totally forgotten I applied here! I have participated even further into AfD now since your post and today I have started speedy deletion nominating and weeding out spam adverts Drafts like Draft:"Stan - Stanyora", Draft:"Here I Stand ...", Draft:"Pimp" film, 2018, Draft:"Ian" a moving story and Draft:Yochanan Shachmurove, now all deleted. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Adding to the ping as Primefac is one of the admins around here. I have continued to clean things around as Legacypac suggested to prove myself by clearing the draft backlog, now expanded to speedy deletions nominations all approved by admins of Draft:Vivek, Draft:PatarHD, Draft:@FindingRealty, Draft:1kiwae, Draft:Chariho Times (G11), Draft:ARAVIND IYER (G13), Draft:$hanghai Layfeld (G7). Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jovanmilic97/CSD_log shows your CSDs once you turn it on in preferences. I like to keep a link on my userpage so I can monitor declines and untags. Legacypac (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will use this from now, thank you for the suggestion! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 01:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November[edit]

User:Kirbanzo[edit]

Kirbanzo (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've been on this project for a while now, dealing with bad new articles during that time, so helping with the draft space is an interest of mine. I will be willing to help others with their AfC submissions, and I understand the process of reviewing a draft.

If I am accepted, I promise to to do my best to assist in the AfC project as much as possible. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am inclined to oppose this request, based on recent encounters with Kirbanzo, until I have more confidence they will be able to field new user's questions effectively without biting their heads off. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For example here, where you told an editor that they were blanking without leaving an edit summary, while the edit summary was quite clearly provided by the editor. Therefore, the suggestion is to be more careful in such edits, participate in the article space, AFD, CSD desks; Twinkle would be a good support. Reapply after perhaps 2-3 months of no mistakes. Thanks.

Not done Lourdes 23:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Otr500[edit]

Otr500 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I believe I would be an asset to the project. I feel that I have extensive knowledge of the policies and guidelines, that include core content and Copyright violations, and have created close to 80 articles having "autopatrolled" rights. I have read the AFC reviewing instructions and have participated in AFD's but see there is a backlog in AFC so think I can help. I would also like to be considered for NPR. Otr500 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done and added the reviewer bit for additional support, Lourdes 17:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JalenFolf[edit]

JalenFolf (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Username change from Jd22292 Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 03:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:NewsTeamAssemble[edit]

NewsTeamAssemble (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I primarily dabble in popular culture-related topics and have a handful of created articles over the years (music, television and cannabis come to mind). AfD and policy Talk discussions certainly have their merits and have become more commonplace for me to contribute as I've become less discouraged and more comfortable with assessing the guidelines. I reviewed the criteria and would like to try my hand at AfC and feel I can add meticulous-ness and a willingness to copyedit to the Project. News Team Assemble!^[talk?] 05:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Has enough mainspace edits but almost no edits to Wikipedia space which means no experience with WP:AFD and WP:MFD. Without a demonstrated handle on what will and will not survive deletion discussions it is hard to judge pages at AfC. I also suggest turning on the CSD log and Twinkle and going to work on deleting some unsuitable pages in Draft or Userspace to show understanding of what is speedy deletable since we see so much of that at AfC. Legacypac (talk) 07:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but unfortunately it looks like you took Legacypac's advice as a challenge and jumped in head-first without possibly fully understanding what they were suggesting. I would highly suggest you enable the CSD log in your Preferences, so that when (or if) you apply in the future we can look to see if there's any marked improvement. I would also suggest slowing down and maybe hanging around WP:AFD instead, since that is a little slower-paced and allows for more discussion and nuance. Primefac (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spinster300[edit]

Spinster300 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have been interested in helping out in reducing the AFC backlog for quite some time now; I have studied the reviewing instructions for a month now and I meet the eligibility criteria, having created 70+ articles (usually translations of biographies from foreign languages). I believe I have a thorough understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and hope to contribute to this project to the best of my abilities. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

I don't see any experience with WP:AfD which is really important to understanding what is and is not acceptable here. You should also turn on your WP:CSD log in preferences and get some experience in deletion as we process a lot of junk at AfC. Legacypac (talk) 07:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, does not meet minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:LakesideMiners[edit]

LakesideMiners (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I sometimes see drafts that are never going to be accepted in their current state, having no sources, being about some random kid or the like. I would like to be able to decline these in order to help drafts that are good get reviewed faster. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 19:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:LakesideMiners would be a valuable addition to AfC. Shows understanding of content creation, SPI, and other areas. A little light on AfD and MfD experience but obviously understands notability and sourcing. Legacypac (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to do this but at this point in time I oppose this, if it matters. Lakeside has virtually no AFD experience and no other areas that would indicate they understand the requirements for mainspace or AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 01:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae, well that is true. I am planing on working on that. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 02:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. You have a ton of article-space edits, but more than 90% of them are huggle reverts. It's good to see you know your vandalism, but that leaves almost no room for demonstrating the rest of the pre-requisites for access to AFCH. Primefac (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest putting that vandal fighting experience to use seeking deletion of spam amd copyvio waiting for review at AfC. Than reapply. Legacypac (talk)

Legacypac, Thank you for the advice. Will do! LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 15:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thegooduser[edit]

Thegooduser (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to review AFC Articles, and reduce the backlog, I have been reverting and Tagging articles for deletion, and been reverting a lot of promotional edits, Original Research,and I've also created a few pages on the Simple English Wikipedia. I understand what qualifies and what does not qualify as a article. If you decline my request that's fine, I will read the reason why. :) Thanks--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:ShunDream[edit]

ShunDream (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I have experience in reviewing pages at WP:NPP and also a regular at AFD. I have the required experience to review pages here at AFC and believe i can help reduce the backlog we have here. I understand all the policies and guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. Currently i have been assigned a WP:NPR rights. I can be put on a probationary period for now. I also have a good AFD Stats.ShunDream (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December[edit]

User:Lopifalko[edit]

Lopifalko (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help with AfC. I am well versed in most if not all content policies and guidelines, have plenty of article creation experience, plenty of experience critiquing or improving new articles, and reasonable experience at XfD. Thanks. Lopifalko (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lourdes 02:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abcmaxx[edit]

Abcmaxx (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I had a rough start to Wiki, the experienced editors did not explain most of why the opposed a lot of the contributions I have made and almost discouraged me to continue on here; since then I have a much greater understanding, co-operated a lot better with others too. Hopefully my rough start will mean I will be more understanding to new users than others. Created a ton of articles, improved tons more and have a string of green in my contributions list, been on here a long time. Have partaken in some AfD dicussions, proposed some deletions. I'll probably be sticking to sports mostly as I'm familiar with WP:FPL WP:FOOTY etc. and that is where I generally contribute Abcmaxx (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thewinrat[edit]

Thewinrat (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've have been in interest of making redirect requests, and i'm ready to review them now. TheWinRat (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your interest. With no AfD experience it will be very difficult to evaluate the chances of a page surviving an AfD. Also, no article creations at all. Come back when you have some experience with page creation and deletion. Thanks. Legacypac (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Milowent[edit]

Milowent (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help out with AfC. I've been around for awhile, been an editor for about 10 years, with varying interests over time, including at AfD, reducing the backlog of unreferenced BLPs, as a creator of the WP:TOP25, but always and foremost as a creator and editor of articles. I don't know if AfC will give me an opportunity to encourage new editors to write good articles off the bat that don't need AfC intervention, but its a hope of mine.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lourdes 02:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:DannyS712[edit]

DannyS712 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to help with the backlog, and meet the requirements. --DannyS712 (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wolfson5[edit]

Wolfson5 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I'd like to get more involved and believe I meet the basic AfC requirements. I also have a decent record at Articles for Deletion and while my personal article creations have been mostly stubs I haven't had any issues with them (except for a single deletion of an article I made early in my Wikipedia career). I've read the reviewing instructions and requirements. Wolfson5 (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I think in the normal course, this is a borderline case. I'm doing this based on my personal assessment and good faith. Please be careful while reviewing and please go slow. Lourdes 02:41, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jacona[edit]

Jacona (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I've been involved here already, but my name changed from JaconaFrere to Jacona. Jacona (talk) 20:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Jacona (talk) 20:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lourdes 02:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Azkord[edit]

Azkord (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help for AFC as i am reviewing new pages through NPP and i'm now familiar with AFC CSD and XFD policy. So i want you to grant me these right. Azkord (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. I'm a little concerned with the decline at AFC, the block, and other notices on your talk page (mostly regarding CSD nominations). I'd like to see a bit more positive activity at AFD and a good CSD log (enable it in your preferences). Primefac (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: AFC is declined cause they couldn't review the page and has not given any suitable reason and suggested for DRV and about my block it was long time ago cause of vandalism and now i have rollback right as i have learned many things regarding that and there are two csd which i filed too soon cause i found that they were not suitable while i was patrolling through new pages feed. Regards, Azkord (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:G.scaringi[edit]

G.scaringi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to be a reviewer for AFC and help with the backlog. I am familiar with content policies and guidelines, and I promise to do my best. Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:RonaldDuncan[edit]

RonaldDuncan (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I can help with the backlog. The Draft:FIS Cross-Country World Cup records and statistics is in my area of expertise since I competed in Alpine World Cup and know a reasonable amount about cross country, so I looked at how I could review it. I have participated in a few AfD discussions recently, and fixed up the articles so that they were kept. Spam/Junk is easy to spot and delete. I understand WP:AFD and WP:MFD. I think it is important to help those that have bothered to go through the draft process and am happy to put the effort in. Fixing things is more work, and I have helped with some good article reviews and the good article process has some similarities to operating the review script process, and I have read and understand the instructions.RonaldDuncan (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 23:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lojbanist[edit]

Lojbanist (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

As a longtime XFD (articles, templates, and miscellany) participant, I think that I would be the perfect AFC reviewer. Kamafa Delgato _(Lojbanist)^{Styrofoam is not made from kittens.} 22:26, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, user has retired. Primefac (talk) 23:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:CoolSkittle[edit]

CoolSkittle (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help clear the backlog, and I believe I meet the requirements to become a reviewer. I am a participant at Miscellany for deletion and regularly CSD tag drafts. CoolSkittle (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed this user has been successfully cleaning up Draft space at MfD. Seems pretty knowledgable from everything I've seen. Legacypac (talk) 12:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nathan2055[edit]

Nathan2055 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Following up from my request in October, I'm now rerequesting as I have gained quite a bit of more recent experience voting in AfDs, CSDing spam drafts (and reporting problem accounts associated), and moving drafts to proper titles as they get submitted. I do apparently still have AFCH access due to being grandfathered in, and I have declined a few blatant problematic drafts as I've encountered them, but I've held off on any large-scale reviewing until I get approved. I'm hoping I can get moved to the active list and get the NPP bit since I'm going to have a lot of free time for a few weeks over winter break to work on reviewing. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 10:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you can make AfC comments and decline you are on the active list. No one is complaining about your work so go to work on the backlog. Legacypac (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done and moved back to active. Welcome back. Primefac (talk) 23:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:FR30799386[edit]

FR30799386 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help out with keeping the backlog down. Regards. —

f r +

11:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done; as already told to you, please ensure the edit that led to your recent block doesn't happen again. These things happen, but it's your duty to take care that they don't involve the project being disrupted. Thanks, Lourdes 03:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cesdeva[edit]

Cesdeva (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I would like to help out. Cesdeva ^(talk) 12:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Primefac (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:SD0001[edit]

SD0001 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

I had been an AfC reviewer for a brief period in the past, before going inactive due to RL issues (and hence getting my name automatically removed from the list). I believe in interacting with the new editors submitting drafts and guiding them, and indeed have done this in the past.

I am also interested in the working of the AFCH script - and contributing to its development if I feel like it. I have been contributing to Twinkle for quite some time and am looking for more work to do in the realm of user scripts on Wikipedia.

Thanks for your consideration, and Happy new year to you! SD0001 (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be an AFC reviewer. I have been contributing to wikipedia now for over 5 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubbyfem (talk • contribs) 09:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]