Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology/Heraldry by country

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcut

Welcome to the talk page for the Heraldry by country series task force! If you have questions or comments regarding the Heraldry by country project, you have come to the right place.

Task Force[edit]

Members[edit]

If you would like to sign up, add * ~~~~ to the list below.

Discussion[edit]

I have added some requests below. It may seem a little overwhelming at first, but we can divide and conquer and get this list taken care of before too long. I would suggest giving priority to article creation and reassessment. I can take on creating Japanese heraldry and assessing Maltese heraldry. I can't assess the other two, because I was the major contributor. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance rankings[edit]

Alternative work list by perceived importance

This is a proposed importance list (in the usual way of being not whether work needs doing, but rather how the page is important to an encyclopaedia). Amendments are welcome; reasons should be noted below the table, preferably.

Importance Pages
Top English heraldry, German heraldry, Swedish heraldry, Japanese heraldry, Spanish heraldry, French heraldry, Danish heraldry
Mid Dutch heraldry, Norwegian heraldry, Russian heraldry, Italian heraldry, Scottish heraldry, Irish heraldry, Welsh heraldry, United States heraldry, Portuguese heraldry, Chinese heraldry, Swiss heraldry, Polish heraldry, Icelandic heraldry,

I'm not altogether sure that we should use an importance scale, for two reasons. H&V doesn't use an importance scale, and I don't see a compelling reason for us to add one to some H&V articles. Also, I think heraldry-related articles are especially prone to WP:BIAS and having an importance scale may play into that bias. I'm also unsure on what basis we would rate importance - by which countries have the best potential for a GA or FA, or by which countries have the longest or richest heraldic tradition, or by which countries have the most white English-speaking Christians? See what I mean? It quickly plays into the Anglocentric systemic bias, especially when one looks at how the source materials are weighted. We have to face the fact that there are far more (and far better) sources on British heraldry than on any other heraldic tradition, particularly when one gets outside of Europe/North America/Australia. I don't think we can say any country or any country's heraldic tradition is any more or less important than any other. I realize that it's the articles we are rating and not the countries, honestly I do, but it easily looks like we are just picking our favorites and it plays right into the bias problem. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for article creation[edit]

Turned into a stub. The reference is really detailed on many such issues, it's worth looking at. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Japanese heraldry is a redirect to Mon (crest). I would like to see this redirect replaced by a stub. I'm adding this to my own to-do list. If anyone would like to help, let me know on my talk page. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for article improvement[edit]

Requests for article assessment[edit]

I'd have no problem with B-class here, except that's hard to justify based on two sources, one of which only concerns a specific issue. I can however, appreciate the problem here concerning the lack of those sources existing. Hard to decide really. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Russian heraldry - newly created. Somewhere between start/B (probably former for the time being) since I found the Russian regulation system rather confusing, not to mention contradictory. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article, Good Articles and Peer Review[edit]

Featured Articles[edit]

Featured Article candidates[edit]

Good Articles[edit]

Good Article candidates[edit]

Peer Review[edit]

Heraldry by country template talk[edit]

Should we add Imperial heraldry to the template (i.e. Holy Roman Empire heraldry [redirect to German heraldry, at least for now], Byzantine heraldry, Russian Imperial heraldry [redirect to National emblems of the Russian Empire, for now], etc.)? Wilhelm_meis (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be any that would actually make pages - Byzantine heraldry, certainly. I think that actually HRE and Russian Empire ones would be best as sections of the current nations' pages, since they match up well enough. If there are then individual pages like the last of your links, then {main} would be applicable, but I wouldn't consider them necessary on this template. Russian heraldry should be created - I've found a good site and me or Grandiose may get round to it. For the record, someone added Frisian heraldry, which, while I wouldn't have added it myself, is not altogether disagreeable. As a second option, we could split the template into "Current nation states", and "Other states or areas". - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 09:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I like that idea: 1)Current countries and 2)Former countries. I don't want to get tied up in semantics of "nation state" vs. "country", but for areas that were formerly identified as countries, but are no longer recognized as "countries" (viz Flanders, Frisia, Byzantium, etc.), I think "Former countries" should be a sufficient designation. My original thought was to have a separate section of "Empires", but I would not be opposed to absorbing those into "Former countries". Sorry I've been so slow about the Japanese heraldry article. I've been gathering sources and looking over the data, and what I have found has mostly supported the idea that the Japanese, during their feudal period, had a broadly similar system of instruments serving similar purposes, but in forms different from their European counterparts. They had all manner of heraldic banners, but no painted shields, but then they also had the clan mon (usually called "crest" in English sources). I'm also waiting to get hold of a couple more sources from the library. What appear to be the best sources always seem to be checked out. O well, I'll get it done eventually. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently added Cornish heraldry under the United Kingdom but it has now been removed. As is explained in the article, under heraldic law Cornwall constituted a separate heraldic nation, and that is why I added it. If it can't be put under the United Kingdom then where should it be placed??? Bodrugan (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed some links in the template, links which were red or which just were redirects to national emblems (Turkey, Frisia etc.). While there may be reason to have these in the template, I think re-adding them should wait at least until there are stub articles created for them. Arms Jones (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Heraldry_and_vexillology/Heraldry_by_country&oldid=592927129"