Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive July 2016
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Perhaps someone could have a look at this. The references are to two very recent articles from a single author, so I wonder whether this is accepted science (that's the only reason I post this here, this goes way beyond me, I'm not a physicist... :-) --Randykitty (talk) 08:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Foundations of Physics is a real journal, but it publishes articles of varying quality. The other journal I am less sure about. The article itself is all original research, because I could find no secondary sources for this topic. It doesn't look notable. --Mark viking (talk) 08:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Original research: not suitable for WP. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC).
- His η operator is reminiscent of creation and annihilation operators. JRSpriggs (talk) 09:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- The page has been nominated for deletion. Primefac (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your efforts, people! Looks like my hunch that something is amiss was correct. Removing this from my watchlist, so you'll have to ping me in the (unlikely) case you need my input. --Randykitty (talk) 18:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- The page has been nominated for deletion. Primefac (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- His η operator is reminiscent of creation and annihilation operators. JRSpriggs (talk) 09:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
A new draft at AFC needs opinions from topic specialists please. If you do not wish to do a full AFC review please post your opinion to the draft's talk page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Observable universe
I just want to let WikiProject Physics know that pretty much one editor, User:Banedon, seems to making what appear to be significant changes to the Observable universe article - according to their entries on the talk page since 20 March 2016 (until now) [1], [2], [3]. I'm not sure of the accuracy, I am wondering if someone could verify the accuracy of the edits to the article page.Steve Quinn (talk) 04:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- If possible someone check the latest objection on that talk page as well, thanks! Banedon (talk) 04:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Self promotion?
Somebody should have a look at the activities of LathiaRutvik (talk · contribs · count). I don't have time myself for the moment... YohanN7 (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
RFC at "Flux" talk page
I was recently alerted to an RFC over at the talk page of the "Flux" article that probably needs more input from some of the regulars in the Physics community: please see this request for comment on Talk:Flux ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)