Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive June 2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Just a heads up that we'll likely have someone that's WP:NOTHERE going on an arxiv purge. I'm not quite sure what their problem is, but they clearly are not interest in constructive dialogue. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- To their question "Who are the people making the decisions here, what gives them the right?" I have answered on their user talk, as the article talk page thread was already closed. - DVdm (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
There's currently a discussion about whether or not the lead of Isaac Newton in popular culture is too detailed. Please comment. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
There is now an RFC on it. Please comment. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination). Xxanthippe (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC).
- Oh yes, the hidden agenda of physicists are finally uncovered and therefore they are indicted of conspiratively running deletionists' activities against this heartwarming article about a prodigy child. Currently viewfinder and friends summon to a final blow. Purgy (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Someone from this project should probably review this AfC draft. Probably not the kind of thing your run-of-the-mill AfC folks are really going to be able to accurately evaluate. TimothyJosephWood 16:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Done I just accepted it as Nanoscale vacuum-channel transistor. --Steve (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
