Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science Fiction/Assessment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconScience Fiction Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Clean assessment request list?[edit]

The list of requests for assessment dates back to Sept 2008. Some of the requests have been crossed out after being assessed, but many have not. I would like to suggest the list be updated. Either crossing out requests that have been fulfilled or remove them from the list. Does anybody have opinions about this? - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 08:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone through the request list and found out which items have been assessed and which have not. The list below shows the article, the date the request for assessment was made and whether the article was assessed or not.

Quatermass (TV serial) - 7 September 2008 = Assessment completed
Urras (fictional planet) - 24 November 2008 = Assessment completed
Anarres - 24 November 2008 = Assessment completed
Ekumen - 24 November 2008 = Assessment completed
Sector General - 17 January 2009 = Assessment completed
James White (author) - 17 January 2009 = Assessment completed
Jack Dann - 6 February 2009 = Assessment completed
Alien (Alien franchise) - 14 February 2009 = Assessment completed
The War of the Worlds and A Princess of Mars - 2 March 2009 = TWotW NOT Assessed and APoM Assessment completed
List of Star Trek: The Animated Series episodes - 10 April 2009 = NOT Assessed
Space Gun (video game) - 23 September 2009 = Assessment completed
FlashForward (TV series) - 20 October 2009 = Assessment completed
Carrie Jones - 21 January 2010 = Assessment completed
Duncan Lunan - 16 June 2010 = Assessment completed
List of science fiction television programs - 19 July 2010 = NOT Assessed
Klaatu barada nikto - 28 July 2010 = NOT Assessed

I will update the list some time in the future if there are no objections. - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 17:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing no objections, I have cleaned the request list. I have also added a note about striking items off the list (note is a copy of the one at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Assessment). - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 01:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The List of science fiction television programs has been assessed + rated by Someone another April 2, 2012.
Thanks for caring. Keep up the good work. ;-)
MDGx 09:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marked Inactive[edit]

I have marked this project Inactive since the last time an article was reviewed was almost a year ago. Feel free to change this if anybody wants to re-activate this Wikiproject. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (H3O+) 14:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it to semi-active, since I and others I know continue to assess articles and tag them with the project template. Also, I am about to write a fanzine article encouraging people to participate in the project. Netmouse (talk) 03:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to get this project at least semi-active again, and have been assessing some articles and adding the appropriate tag. The Assessment Log isn't updating, though. Do I need to do something to turn the Assessment Log bot back on or something? I'm new and learning! Thanks! CiaraCat (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updated example articles for quality scale[edit]

The links to example articles for the project's quality scale weren't to specific revisions of the articles. This is unusual - most WikiProject quality scales link to specific versions - and it could result in incorrect assessments by editors less familiar with the scale. It's possible that someone might greatly improve or damage an article listed as an example for a particular class, yet the article would remain listed as an example of its original, but now incorrect, class. Aside from the addition of an A-class article, the links were exactly the same as they were in May 2013.

Articles have changed in the intervening time, and standards for the article classes may have shifted as well. I've BOLD-ly changed the links to specific revisions of recently assessed/re-assessed articles for stub, start, C, B, GA, and FA classes (I didn't find any A-class assessments in the lists from late December until now). Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]