Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek/mainpage/tasks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconStar Trek Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the page attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

De-Redlinking DS9 Episode List[edit]

If no-one has any objections I'll take care of the DS9 episode list... I've done 'Little Green Men', 'The Sword of Kahless', 'Homefront' and 'Crossfire' if you want to see examples...

Riker[edit]

The "William Riker" page is in need of a new picture. The one there has him in the grey and black uniform, which is not how he looked for the majority of his star trek career. It's just a real pain in the ass to find another picture on the internet that is of good quality and that follows all their copyright rules

Mnpeter 14:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though this is an old discussion, thought I would comment, this has been taken care of. Ejfetters 02:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: TNG episode summaries[edit]

Most of the episode summaries for Star Trek: The Next Generation contain extremely long plot summaries followed by "trivia" sections that include both "making-of" trivia and "goofs." These plot summaries need to be shortened and the trivia sections need to be better incorporated into the main body of the article. Also, goofs do not belong in Wikipedia; they belong in IMDb. This is especially true for supposed in-universe goofs (i.e. inconsistencies between episodes). Unless these goofs have been published somewhere, they are all original research. --Hnsampat 17:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. This is pretty much the case for episode articles from the all the series. Morwen - Talk 17:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Friendly Heads Up[edit]

I hope this is the right place to put this. I've noticed a lot of the Enterprise episodes are all sorts of weird. No infoboxes, or ones with no proceeding or following episode boxes at the end or so on.

One of the biggest examples is

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderland_(Enterprise_episode)

Lots42 01:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Legacy is an article that I think should be reworked entirely. NPOV seems to be a problem in the article, as does a poorly written "plot summary". Several have already complained on the article's talk page, and I think this article should be added to the WikiProject: Star Trek task list. I own the game, and plan to do some work on the article soon, also.
--FastLizard4 (Talk|Contribs) 04:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Dark Armada[edit]

On the Dutch wikipedia, there's an article about: Star Trek: Dark Armada link. It's a fan-based movie project, and it seems to be still very active, so why not porting this page to here? (I'm willing to do it, if needed.) --DanielPharos (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Riverside, Iowa[edit]

At least 4 users have tried to add information from the new movie about Riverside, Iowa to that page. User Nyttend keeps removing it saying the movie is too new to be canon. Also claims ST4 made Kirk's birthplace in Iowa canon which is not correct. Wants decision from Star Trek wikiproject. See history for that page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.44.15 (talk) 23:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this from the To-Do list; please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek if necessary. -- Aatrek / TALK 14:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]