Category talk:Articles by quality

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Articles by quality category.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Categories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of categories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CategoriesWikipedia:WikiProject CategoriesTemplate:WikiProject CategoriesCategories articles

Article quality research (inactive)

This article is within the scope of the article quality research project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Article quality researchWikipedia:WikiProject Article quality researchTemplate:Quality assessmentArticle quality research articles

Council

This category relates to the WikiProject Council, a collaborative effort regarding WikiProjects in general. If you would like to participate, please visit the project discussion page.CouncilWikipedia:WikiProject CouncilTemplate:WikiProject CouncilCouncil articles

NA on the sorting of class categories (from this talk)[edit]

I think I see what you are doing with the class categories, but you have FL as a main cat and List as an na cat. Is that right? If I have what you're doing wrong, fair play, but I think List is a part of the assessment scales now and picked up by the bot. Hiding T 09:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, list articles either are List-Class or FL-Class (featured list class). See Wikipedia:Featured lists and Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists. List articles are different than prose articles, which accounts for the modified quality assessment scale. I don't think there are plans for FC-Class (Featured Current-Class) articles and FF-Class (Featured Future-Class) articles. Category:Articles by quality is a subcategory of Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments. Wikipedia 1.0 assessments would not FA, GA, B, Start, or Stub rate an article different because it contains Current event information or Future event information. Category:Current-Class articles and Category:Future-Class articles just do not seem to fit within this direct subcategory of Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments. I think the categories "Current-Class articles" and "Future-Class articles" should be renamed, but I would settle for them not being categorized within a direct subcategory of Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments since Wikipedia 1.0 assessments does not separately deal with current event and future event articles. GregManninLB (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't like the categorization system here[edit]

If I go to say the animals featured articles I don't see any, yet there are FAs for many animals, just in the form of FA-class bird articles etc. If I wanted to see all the FA-class articles of animals it wouldn't be an easy thing to do, especially without knowledge of the existing WikiProjects and categories used. And this applies of course to many other topics and their subtopics. Richard001 (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]