Category talk:Battles by country involved

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Naming convention[edit]

See previous discussion here
See WP:MILHIST#CATNAME as listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter January 2007 — MrDolomite | Talk 21:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cat alpha sort[edit]

I have been wikignoming thru the subcats cleaning up the alpha sort to remove "Battle of" or "Siege of"

— MrDolomite | Talk 22:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slovakia Missing[edit]

Any reason some countries are not listed? One area I noticed was: Slovakia Czechoslokia Bohemia-Morevia Mkpumphrey 18:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland[edit]

At present, people have put a number of early battles in the category "Battles involving Scotland" which clearly pre-date the creation of a unitary Scottish kingdom, the category guideline says they should not be included. The trouble is, what do we do with them? I created a category "Battles involving the Picts", then "Battles involving Dál Riata". However, is this overdoing it? We potentially have yet another category "Battles involving the Kingdom of Strathclyde". Are we in danger of "Battles by country" ending up including a very large number of sub-categories, some of them referring to obscure peoples or kingdoms and only containing a handful of battles. Would it be better to lump them together in one category "Battles involving the peoples of early Scotland"? Should we sub-categorise this by e.g. Picts, Dál Riata, Strathclyde? Even then we have a grey area since Strathclyde was incorporated into Scotland slightly later than the unification of the Picts and Scots. PatGallacher 09:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]