Category talk:Brazilian jiu-jitsu practitioners

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconMartial arts Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Category name[edit]

What an odd category name - it reads like it's Brazilian people who practice Jiu-Jitsu. I was surprised to see Paul Walker on such a list! --Larry laptop 19:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the category name is odd, and needs to be restructured. Also, practitioners should be renamed to -ka. To follow other martial arts, there need to be sub-categories of Category:Brazilian jiu-jitsuka, including Category:Brazilian Brazilian jiu-jitsuka, Category:Canadian Brazilian jiu-jitsuka, and Category:Australian Brazilian jiu-jitsuka to name a few. Is there a better way to word these? Also, is it necessary to even have "Brazilian" in the category name? "Jiu-jitsu" alone shoud be enough to distinguish this from the Japanese style. --Scott Alter 17:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They are two different arts, so you two different categories, 'Brazilian Jujutsuka' (for Brazilians who practice Japanese jujustu) and 'Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Practitioners' for anybody who does BJJ. The key thing is that BJJ is now so different from JJJ that it's not classifiable as a style of JJJ but an art in its own right.
'Category:Brazilian Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu practitioners', is going to have to be a category if you want to split by country, the only way it can think to change it is to hyphenate to give '[country] Brazilian-Jiu-Jitsu practitioners'. The use of 'ka' to denote a practitioner is Japanese so using it for a south American art would be inappropriate. --Nate 08:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]