Category talk:Greater Manchester geography stubs

This category falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles

Stub sorting

This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Greater Manchester

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles

England

This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles

Untitled

Would somebody like to review Bowdon and see whether it still rates as a stub. How do I get this reviewed if you can't review it? Why not add something at the top of this article saying what to do when you think something is no loner a stub? Cosmopolitancats 12:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

review of stubs

Should there not be some form of prioritsation for expanding stubs? For example, do all stubs merit being expanded? Could there not be a 'top priority' list for stubs which do need to be expanded? Cosmopolitancats 00:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]