Category talk:Hermeticism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ancient Egypt Categorization[edit]

As I find the books to document this I'll add it in. That'll stop the edit warring.

KV(Talk) 17:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's irrelevant. Hermeticism is not exclusively Ancient Egyptian and does not belong in the category. If you find references (and Manly P. Hall's imagination does not count), then I will survey the editors of the article about this too. In fact, I may start right away. Stop trying to force your original ideas and biases on WP. They aren't wanted. Didn't you get the hint when half your articles were deleted in AfD? —Hanuman Das 17:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't have to be exclusively Ancient Egyptian. Please point out any policy that says so. Hitler is not exclusively an artist, nor exclusively a politician or a dictator. Yet he'd be tagged for those. And if you cite Hall for the point, and knowing that he is dead and I am not him, it wouldn't be an original idea. In fact, I can cite several sources, I just need to get them in my hands, they are not accessible from work on my break.
KV(Talk) 18:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PS, you are reverting too, keep that in mind.
KV(Talk) 18:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only person who disagrees with this. Seems you haven't yet figured out what battles are worth fighting and what are not (hint, as soon as it become two to one, you've lost). Maybe you could justify putting the article into the category, but not the whole category, since most of the things in the category are clearly post-Egyptian. —Hanuman Das 18:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be one of the others who disagree until you provide acurate information. SynergeticMaggot 18:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]