Category talk:Ski areas and resorts in British Columbia/Category talk:Canadian ski resorts

I notice Mount Seymour, Grouse Mountain, and Cypress Provincial Park have been categorized here as a Canadian ski resorts. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Canadian_ski_resorts) From the definition: A ski resort is a ski area, but with a village and/or high-end accommodations and other amenities at the base of the mountain. I don't consider Seymour or Cypress resorts at all. Ski areas, sure. Grouse (though still lacking accommodation) has high-end food, shopping, and entertainment, so I suppose it approaches resort status. Thoughts? --Ds13 15:08, 2005 May 27 (UTC)

I agree. --Hooperbloob 18:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I also concur. [[User:Consequencefree|Ardent^†_∈]] 01:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, on all points by Ds13. Also, a lot of smaller ski areas in the Interior are named "area", and many such as Summit Lake (near Nakusp) and Troll (near on the Quesnel-Wells/Barkerville Highway or the small one in the Hart neighbourhood of PG are definitely not "resorts". Hemlock Valley and Manning and Mount Timothy and Harper, well, OK, there's at least some condos, but I wouldn't call any one of them "resorts".Skookum1 (talk) 04:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]