Denezpi v. United States

Denezpi v. United States
Denezpi v. United States
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 13, 2022
Full case name	Denezpi v. United States
Docket no.	20-7622
Citations	596 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	The double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
Majority	Barrett
Dissent	Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor (in part), Kagan (in part)

Denezpi v. United States, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Denezpi v. United States, No. 20-7622, 596 U.S. ___ (2022).
^ "Focusing on the meaning of "offense," a divided court throws salt on double jeopardy claim". SCOTUSblog. June 14, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2024.

External links

Text of Denezpi v. United States, No. 20-7622, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Denezpi v. United States, No. 20-7622, 596 U.S. ___ (2022).

[2] "Focusing on the meaning of "offense," a divided court throws salt on double jeopardy claim". SCOTUSblog. June 14, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2024.

[1]

[2]