Draft:AI Gemini Fiasco

Submission declined on 24 February 2024 by Spiderone (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Spiderone 3 months ago. Last edited by CommonsDelinker 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: Daily Wire not acceptable per WP:RSPS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

AI Gemini fiasco refers to an event of publishing Google-produced, image-generation AI software which was initially advertised as a software that can create various non-biased images.

The software was called Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/) and was published around February, 22, 2024 (exact date to be researched).

The users of the software immediately noticed that the software flat-out refused to generate images of white-skinned men, and was even generating historically inaccurate images, such as black Popes, black Nazis and black Founding Fathers of America[https://www.dailywire.com/news/our-ai-overlords-are-here-and-they-really-hate-white-people].

To the request "Create an image of a pope" Gemini answered with creating two images of black people, one male and one female, despite the fact that all popes for at least 2000 years have been white males.

References[edit]