Draft:Algnosticism
Submission declined on 11 June 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Algnosticism is a philosophical doctrine that combines principles from "algorithm" and "agnosticism". It posits that the human intellect is fundamentally incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to prove or justify the existence of a definitive algorithm in market behavior. This concept arises from the intersection of financial market theory, computational algorithms, and epistemological skepticism.
The term "algnosticism" is derived from the words "algorithm" and "agnosticism." It was coined to reflect the skepticism regarding the ability to ever discover or confirm an algorithm that asserts influence on market behaviors such as price action.
Historical Context
Algnosticism emerged as a response to the advancements in computational finance and the increasing reliance on complex algorithms in financial markets, particularly in trading and investment strategies. Proponents of algnosticism argue that the modern trade markets are too erratic that they are likely governed by algorithms created by powerful institutions, although this theory has never been officially proven nor has any institution ever admitted the use of such algorithms.
Core Principles
- Skepticism of Algorithmic Control: Algnosticism posits that no single algorithm can control or predict market prices and price actions with complete accuracy. But it also questions the existence of institutionally developed algorithms that drive market behavior.
- Inherent Market Complexity: It emphasizes the complexity and dynamic nature of financial markets, influenced by a vast array of variables including human behavior, geopolitical events, and macroeconomic factors. This complexity complicates the identification of the presence of any governing algorithms.
- Epistemological Limitation: Algnosticism asserts the limitations of human cognition and computational power in comprehensively understanding and modeling market behavior. It suggests that our knowledge and tools are insufficient to capture the full scope of market dynamics.
- Non-Deterministic Systems: Financial markets are seen as non-deterministic systems where randomness and unforeseen events play crucial roles. Algnosticism highlights that past data and patterns do not necessarily determine future outcomes. Such discrepancies suggest that market behavior is influenced by unpredictable and dynamic factors that might be manipulated by powerful institutions.
Implications
Algnosticism has significant implications for trading practice:
- Risk Management: It advocates for robust risk management strategies that incorporate a broader understanding of market uncertainties.
- Diversification: Encourages diversification of investment strategies to mitigate the risks associated with the unpredictability of markets.
- Ethical Considerations: The potential possibility of the creation of an illusion of the demand-and-supply dynamics raises questions about the ethical application of algorithms that contribute to market volatility.
Related Concepts
- Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): Suggests that markets are generally efficient and that it is impossible to consistently achieve higher returns than the overall market without taking on additional risk.
- Behavioral Finance: Examines the psychological influences on market participants and how they can lead to market anomalies that challenge the idea of perfectly rational markets.
- Algorithmic Trading: The use of algorithms to execute trades based on predefined criteria, often involving complex calculations and high-speed data processing.
Conclusion
Algnosticism presents a thought-provoking perspective on the limits of human intellect in financial markets. By questioning the possibility of a market-controlling algorithm, it encourages a more cautious and diversified approach to market participation, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging and managing the inherent uncertainties of financial systems.
See also
[edit]- CLS Group
- Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
- Investment banking
- Central bank
- Commodity market
- Foreign exchange market
External links
[edit]- AI in Financial Markets: Invisible Hand - IABAC Control of Algorithms in Financial Markets
- AI in Financial Markets: Algorithms and Applications - ESS Global Training Solutions
- The Invisible Hand: AI in Financial Markets and Algorithmic Trading
- Harvard Law School - Market Manipulation: Definitional Approaches - Case Study CSP055
- Detecting Financial Market Manipulation with Statistical Physics Tools - Kings College London