Draft:Audiovisual Identity Database
Submission declined on 28 April 2023 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 March 2023 by Spiderone (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Spiderone 17 months ago. | ![]() |
![]() Logo used from April 2, 2023 to June 8, 2024[a] | |
Formerly | CLG Wiki (2007-2022) |
---|---|
Type of site | Internet encyclopedia Reference for on-screen corporate identities |
Available in | English |
Registration | Optional |
Launched | 2007 |
Current status | Active |
The Audiovisual Identity Database (formerly known as the CLG Wiki) is an online encyclopedia. It is best known for describing production logos of various companies.
History
[edit]In 2007, a website called the CLG Wiki formed. They later moved to Miraheze in 2021 and rebranded to Audiovisual Identity Database in September 27, 2022.
Features
[edit]The wiki's general pages feature the company's background, visual descriptions of its identities, the techniques used, the audio heard, availability, and the legacy of specific idents, whether it be throughout pop culture or within the wiki's community.
External links
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The logo's wordmark had been in use from October 3, 2022 to June 8, 2024. The logomark was refined on the aforementioned day to include purple.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.