Draft:Clean Energy Canada
Submission rejected on 23 January 2024 by Usedtobecool (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Usedtobecool 4 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 23 days ago. |
Submission declined on 6 December 2023 by Lizthegrey (talk). The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Simon Fraser University. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you. Declined by Lizthegrey 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 5 December 2023 by ToadetteEdit (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by ToadetteEdit 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 3 December 2023 by Lizthegrey (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Lizthegrey 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 23 November 2023 by Ca (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Ca 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 22 November 2023 by Rich Smith (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Rich Smith 6 months ago. |
- Comment: The organisation appears to be doing important work at the national level. So, I would have expected it to be notable. But I just can't find the evidence for it. Not in the draft, not in my own search. It fails the second criterion of WP:NONPROFIT. Consider merging content that can be merged to existing articles. A redirect may be advisable if there's a good target. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Insufficient evidence of independent, reliable sources about the organisation; suggest making a section of its parent organisation instead. Papers published by the organisation do not themselves constitute notability. lizthegrey (talk) 03:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Aside from the journals, some of the sources are passing mentions of the subject. Toadette (Happy holiday!) 06:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: As per Ca, this contains citebombing and lacks sufficient editorial independence from the organisation itself. Consider merging this content to a section of Simon Fraser University instead of having a separate page for it. lizthegrey (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Non independent, affiliated blog postnon-independent, written by the founders themselveswritten by CEC staffdittoThe problem is that most of the sources are written by CEC or affiliated personnale. And they are supproting promotional claims.The few times the CEC was cited does not do anything for notability. We are not looking for the number of cites, we are looking for indepdenent reliable coverage that we can base an article on.Please remove vast majority of the non-indepdentn sources. Ca talk to me! 00:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The WP:CITEBOMB in 'Influence' and 'Publications' needs to be cut down... 1 or 2 per statement you are refencing will be fine - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Formation | 2010 |
---|---|
Founder | Merran Smith[1] |
Type | Non profit[2] |
Headquarters | Vancouver |
Location | |
Locations |
|
Executive Director | Mark Zacharias |
Website | cleanenergycanada.org |
Clean Energy Canada is a non profit[2] non-partisan think tank based out of Simon Fraser University that conducts and publishes research on climate and clean energy policy. The organization is formally a program of the university's Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue but is independently funded.[3][4]
A study of Canadian civil society organizations adressing climate change identifies Clean Energy Canada as a "large, well-established Canadian environmental non-governmental organization (ENGO)" and the second-most active pro-climate actor in Canada in terms of engagement.[5]
Focus & Activities[edit]
Clean Energy Canada researches and communicates solutions to Canada's energy transition, with an "explicit mandate to build consensus around clean growth by bringing business leaders, NGOs, political elites, academics and other segments of civil society into dialogue and collaboration."[6][7] It has been described by media and academics as a climate ENGO and as a progressive think tank.[3][8][9]
Policy Influence[edit]
At the federal level, Clean Energy Canada has called for industrial policy to unlock trade and employment opportunities in renewable energy, clean tech, and energy conservation.[6][10][11] Its work, which includes periodic jobs modelling and other types of economic modelling,[12][13][14][15] has informed the country's 2020 and 2022 (current) climate plans, in addition to supplementary plans and strategies.[16][17]
References[edit]
- ^ Electricity Human Resources Canada (June 12, 2017). "Profile of women working in the clean energy sector in Canada Final Report" (PDF). Natural Resources Canada. pp. 32–33.
- ^ a b Southey, Tabatha (24 May 2019). "Canada's amazing—and invisible—green energy sector". Macleans. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ a b Carroll, William K.; Graham, Nicolas; Shakespear, Mark (2020). "Foundations, ENGOs, Clean Growth Networks and the Integral State". The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 45 (2): 109–142. doi:10.29173/cjs29638. ISSN 0318-6431. JSTOR 27081265.
- ^ "Our partners". Clean Energy Canada. Retrieved 2023-12-04.
- ^ Gunster, Shane (1 December 2022). "Curating Climate (In)Action: Strategic News-Sharing in Canadian Civil Society". Canadian Journal of Communication. 47 (4): 592–620. doi:10.3138/cjc.2022-0012. S2CID 252982454.
See Figure 1 in source for engagement rankings
- ^ a b Baruah, Bipasha; Gaudet, Crystal (2022-08-01). "Creating and Optimizing Employment Opportunities for Women in the Clean Energy Sector in Canada". Journal of Canadian Studies. 56 (2): 243–253. doi:10.3138/jcs.2019-0010. ISSN 0021-9495. S2CID 247822592.
- ^ Bulowski, Natasha (10 January 2023). "Canadians think clean energy is more affordable and secure than fossil fuels: poll". Canada's National Observer. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ Rosenbloom, Daniel (2019-03-01). "A clash of socio-technical systems: Exploring actor interactions around electrification and electricity trade in unfolding low-carbon pathways for Ontario". Energy Research & Social Science. 49: 219–232. Bibcode:2019ERSS...49..219R. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.015. ISSN 2214-6296. S2CID 169071474.
- ^ Cousins, Ben (2023-12-07). "Climate groups welcome emissions cap, energy sector calls it 'unacceptable' - BNN Bloomberg". BNN. Retrieved 2023-12-07.
- ^ Simon Dalby, Dan Scott, Clay Dasilva and Alex Suen. Canada in a Climate Disrupted World Report for the Social Science and Humanities Research Council “Imagining Canada’s Future Initiative” Ottawa, October, 2017. https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=geog_faculty
- ^ "Clean energy provides more jobs than oilsands, report says B.C., Quebec and Ontario polish Canada's renewables record, but Ottawa criticized". CBC News. Dec 2, 2014. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ Rolfe, Kelsey (Jun 23, 2021). "Canada's clean energy push to create more than 200,000 jobs by 2030: report". Financial Post. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ Mishra, Ankit (Apr 3, 2023). "Green Skills Can Enable Workers To Transition And Forge Careers In Canada". Forbes.
- ^ Stanford, Jim (2023-06-01). "Cities Can Lead the Energy Employment Transition … but They Must Plan for It". Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy. 2 (1): 3–19. doi:10.3138/jccpe-2022-0010. ISSN 2816-7414. S2CID 252986060.
- ^ "Clean Energy Canada report on cultivating renewables powerhouse". The Environment Journal. 13 March 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ Service Canada (2022-03-29). "2030 Emissions Reduction Plan: Clean Air, Strong Economy". Government of Canada. Retrieved 2023-12-06.
- ^ Craggs, Samantha (Sep 12, 2023). "Governments' $28.2-billion for EV plants will take 20 years to break even, not five as Ottawa suggested, PBO says". The Globe and Mail.
When the government estimated a shorter break-even timeline, the report says, it relied on modelling from the Trillium Network for Advanced Manufacturing and Clean Energy Canada, which included investments and assumed production increases in other areas of the EV supply chain. The PBO report, meanwhile, only looked at cell and module manufacturing.
- AfC submissions by date/15 December 2023
- AfC submissions by date/06 December 2023
- AfC submissions by date/04 December 2023
- AfC submissions by date/02 December 2023
- AfC submissions by date/22 November 2023
- Draft articles on North America
- Draft articles on business and economics
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.