Draft:DOTEbase

Submission declined on 10 August 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by KylieTastic 2 seconds ago. Last edited by KylieTastic 2 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

DOTEbase^[1] is a desktop software application designed for qualitative research ^[2], primarily in the fields of social sciences and humanities. Developed by BigSoftVideo at Aalborg University, it provides tools for organizing, analyzing, and annotating audiovisual data. The software is designed to support researchers in managing complex datasets by offering an integrated platform that combines the functionalities of transcription, annotation, and data visualization.

History

DOTEbase was developed as an extension of the existing DOTE^[3] software, which focuses on manual transcription. The need for a more comprehensive tool to manage and analyze large audiovisual datasets led to the development of DOTEbase. Its release marked a significant advancement in the ability to handle qualitative data, allowing researchers to gain deeper insights through enhanced data management and visualization capabilities.

Features

Audiovisual Data Management: DOTEbase allows users to create and organize clips from video and audio sources. Researchers can annotate these clips with tags and comments to facilitate detailed analysis.
Transcription Support: Integration with DOTE enables users to work with detailed transcripts, providing a robust framework for linking transcripts with media clips.

Visual Canvas: The software includes a visual canvas tool that helps users create mind maps and visualize patterns within their data. This feature supports clustering and connecting related data points for more comprehensive analysis.

Clip Collections and Playlists: Users can organize clips into collections and playlists, enabling easy access and review of relevant data segments.
Customizable Layouts: DOTEbase offers predefined layouts and the ability for users to create custom layouts, allowing flexibility to suit individual research needs.
Site License: Designed for institutional use, DOTEbase offers a site license model that allows organizations to lease multiple licenses, facilitating widespread access within research teams.
Applications

Licensing

DOTEbase is available for purchase through a site license model, which provides flexibility for organizations to lease multiple licenses. This model ensures that research teams can access the software's full suite of features, tailored to their project requirements.

Reception

Since its release, DOTEbase has been well-received within the academic community for its comprehensive approach to qualitative data analysis. Users have praised its intuitive interface and the depth of features offered, which significantly enhance the research workflow.

References

^ McIlvenny, Paul. "Guide for DOTEbase Users".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
^ Creswell, John (2006). ualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. SAGE.
^ McIlvenny, Paul. "Guide for DOTE Users".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

[1] McIlvenny, Paul. "Guide for DOTEbase Users".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

[2] Creswell, John (2006). ualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. SAGE.

[3] McIlvenny, Paul. "Guide for DOTE Users".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

[1]

[2]

[3]