Draft:Deborah Schrag
| Submission declined on 12 August 2023 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 17 March 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
Comment: What she says cannot be used to established notability (usually) but take a look at the notability guidelines for academics as she might be able to qualify under one those criteria, provided there are adequate sources. For medical claims, see the WP:MEDRS sourcing guidelines. S0091 (talk) 16:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Deborah Schrag | |
|---|---|
| Nationality | American |
| Citizenship | American |
| Spouse | Yochai Benkler |
| Scientific career | |
| Institutions | |
Deborah Schrag is a medical oncologist.[1] She is the current chair of the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.[2] She is known for leading a ground breaking clinical trial that questioned the necessity of radiation therapy for rectal cancer patients. [3][4][5]
Selected publications[edit]
- Schrag, Deborah; Kuntz, Karen M.; Garber, Judy E.; Weeks, Jane C. (1997-05-15). "Decision Analysis — Effects of Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy on Life Expectancy among Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations". New England Journal of Medicine. 336 (20): 1465–1471. doi:10.1056/NEJM199705153362022. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 9148160.
References[edit]
- ^ "Deb Schrag". Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Retrieved 2023-02-09.
- ^ City, New York. "Deb Schrag, MD, MPH, Named Chair of the Department of Medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center". Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Retrieved 2023-02-09.
- ^ "Rectal Cancer Patients Could Be Spared the Effects of Radiation". 2023-06-04. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
- ^ PM, The ASCO Post Staff Posted: 6/4/2023 11:46:00 AM Last Updated: 6/19/2023 2:45:36. "Radiation May Be Safely Omitted in Select Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer - The ASCO Post". ascopost.com. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Piersol, Bill (2023-06-04). "Rectal Cancer Treatment Without Radiation: A New Option | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center". www.mskcc.org. Retrieved 2023-08-11.