Draft:Jonathan Greenaway
Submission declined on 7 August 2024 by Dege31 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Does not pass NBIO, does not pass NACADEMIC, only one source contributes to GNG (Revkin, 2016) Dege31 (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Jonathan Greenaway | |
|---|---|
| Occupation |
|
| Nationality | British |
| Education | Manchester Metropolitan University |
| Genre | Horror, Capitalism, Cultural theory |
| Years active | 2019-present |
| Notable works |
|
Jonathan Greenaway, published professional as Jon Greenaway and thelitcritguy is an English non-fiction author who specializes in horror, contemporary capitalism, and cultural theory. Greenaway is also the co-host of Horror Vanguard, a podcast dedicated to the political study of horror media.[1]
Education
[edit]Greenaway has a BA in English Studies and a Masters degree in Gothic Literature. He holds a PhD from the Manchester Metropolitan University's Manchester Center for Gothic Studies.[1]
Career
[edit]In 2019, Greenaway served as co-editor of Horror and Religion: New Literary Approaches to Theology, Race and Sexuality from the University of Wales Press.[2] This was shortlisted for the Horror Writers Association for their Outstanding Achievement in Non-Fiction award.[3]
His first solo-written book was Theology, Horror and Fiction, A Reading of the Gothic Nineteenth Century with the Bloomsbury Academic Press in 2021. Positively reviewed by academic sources[4] this work was long-listed by the International Gothic Association for their Allan Lloyd Smith Memorial Prize for best monograph.[5]
In 2024, he went on to publish two new books: A Primer on Utopian Philosophy: How Ernst Bloch's work can provide new hope for utopian thinking today (Zer0 Books, an imprint of Collective Ink)[6] and Capitalism A Horror Story : Gothic Marxism and the Dark Side of the Radical Imagination (Repeater Books)[7] .
As both "Jon Greenaway" and "thelitcritguy" he has published a number of essays on topics such as American politics, Donald Trump, utopian ideals, and horror. These essays have appeared in and been cited by outlets such as The Guardian[8] and The New York Times.[9]
Bibliography
[edit]- Horror and Religion: New Literary Approaches to Theology, Race and Sexuality, -- co-edited by Eleanor Beal and Jon Greenaway (UWP, 2021)
- Theology, Horror and Fiction: A Reading of the Gothic Nineteenth Century (Bloomsbury Academic Press, 2021)
- A Primer on Utopian Philosophy: How Ernst Bloch's work can provide new hope for utopian thinking today (Zer0 Books, 2024)
- Capitalism - A Horror Story: Gothic Marxism and the Dark Side of the Radical Imagination (Repeater Books, 2024)
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "Jon Greenaway". Repeater Books.
- ^ "Horror and Religion". UWP. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
- ^ "2018 Bram Stoker Awards Winners & Nominees". The Bram Stoker Awards. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
- ^ Alison Jack. "Review of Theology, Horror and Fiction: A Reading of the Gothic Nineteenth Century by Jonathan Greenway". Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies.
- ^ "Theology, Horror and Fiction". Bloomsbury. Retrieved 6 August 2024.
- ^ "A Primer on Utopian Philosophy". CollectiveInk.
- ^ "Capitalism: A Horror story". Repeater Books.
- ^ thelitcritguy (Jonathan Greenaway) (12 January 2017). "'Want a master's course that's future-proof Just do what you love'". TheGuardian.
- ^ Andrew C. Revkin (4 September 2016). "An Analyst of Gothic Monsters Explores Trump's Appeal". Dot Earth The New York Times blogs.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.