Draft:Katie Davis (researcher)
| Submission declined on 26 December 2023 by MurielMary (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 22 December 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. | |
Comment: Thanks for creating this draft. At this stage, the subject's career doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria for a biography on Wikipedia. Please review the notability criteria. Also, all statements must be reference - the section on her academic career has no citations at all. MurielMary (talk) 09:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Too much of this is copy-pasted from https://katiedavisresearch.com/about/ which has a prominent copyright notification at the bottom of the page.. Please write in your own words and beware of close paraphrase. Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Please very carefully read WP:VERIFY and then WP:NACADEMIC. Qcne (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Katie Davis is an Associate Professor at the University of Washington where she teaches child development and technology design and is the director of the UW Digital Youth Lab. In 2015, she was recognized as a Rising Star by the Association for Psychological Science. Davis has published more than 90 academic papers and presented at a TED event
Katie Davis is best known for the book The App Generation[1], which she co-authored with Howard Gardner. In this book, the two authors examine the relationship between members of gen Z and information technology. Davis and Gardner advocate kids transition from being "app-dependent" to being "app-enabled"[2][3].
In her more recent books, Davis explores fan fiction [4] and parenting in the digital age. [5][1]
In her research at the University of Washington, Davis explores the role that digital media technologies play in adolescents' experiences of friendship and identity. She argues that online peer communications promote adolescents’ sense of belonging and self-disclosure, two important peer processes that support identity development during adolescence.[6] More recently, Davis has commented on the use of artificial intelligence in schools.[7]
Professional background[edit]
Before joining the University of Washington, Katie Davis was a PhD student at Project Zero at Harvard University. She collaborated with Common Sense Media and worked on their curriculum. Katie Davis holds two master’s degrees and a doctorate in Human Development and Education from Harvard Graduate School of Education. Her PhD advisor was Howard Gardner.
References[edit]
- ^ Gardner, Howard; Davis, Katie (2013). The App Generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-1531800017.
- ^ Wortham, Jenna (2013-11-01). "Put That Down!". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-12-25.
- ^ Ehrenfreund, Max (2023-05-17). "Opinion | 'The App Generation: How Today's Youth Navigate Identity, Intimacy, and Imagination in a Digital World' by Howard Gardner and Katie Davis". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2023-12-25.
- ^ Aragon, Cecilia; Davis, Katie (2019). Writers in the secret garden: Fanfiction, youth, and new forms of mentoring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262537803.
- ^ David, Katie (2023). Technology’s child: Digital media’s role in the ages and stages of growing up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262046961.
- ^ Davis, Katie. "Friendship 2.0: Adolescents' experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online". Journal of adolescence. 35 (6): 1527–1536 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
- ^ Milne, Stefan (25 September 2023). "Q&A: Can AI in school actually help students be more creative and self-directed?". eurekalert. Retrieved 25 December 2023.