Draft:LifeworQ
Submission declined on 1 February 2024 by DreamRimmer (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Type of site | Job search engine |
---|---|
Founded | April 2020 |
Headquarters | Monheim am Rhein, Germany |
URL | https://lifeworq.com/ |
Commercial | Yes |
Current status | Active |
LifeworQ (LifeworQ Jobs GmbH) is a job search engine that operates in 12 countries.
History[edit]
The company was founded in 2020 with the aim of posting the largest number of ads within a single platform in order to help users in the job search. Through the algorithms common to various online search engines (like Job ads aggregator), it indexes millions of job listings based on the algorithm what & where that a user types when searching. The site aggregates job listings from thousands of websites, including job boards, staffing firms, associations, and company career pages.
The site uses the powerful Internet bot detector Datadome.[1], also used by established companies in the Recruitment advertising industry such as Appcast.
Articles can also be found on the page to help users navigate the work world through guidance, so as to foster the development of awareness in flexibility in the work environment[2].
Among the company's partners are other job sites such as Indeed, Jobrapido, Stepstone, and Meinestadt[3]
Countries[edit]
The site is present in: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, France, UK, Italy, Holland, Portugal, and the United States.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.