Draft:Luca Magni
| Submission declined on 22 January 2024 by Lopifalko (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 22 January 2024 by TheBritinator (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by TheBritinator 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Apart from relying solely on primary sources, it makes no claim that satisfies the bar for WP:NACADEMIC. Lopifalko (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 |
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Frietjes (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Luca Magni (1964–) is a Professor of Practice at Luiss Business School. Born in Italy, he earned a degree in philosophy from the University of Milan. He further completed his studies in the UK and received a Master of Science in Organizational Psychology from the University of Manchester and a PhD in Technology Enhanced Research and Learning from Lancaster University. Magni has held various HR positions in Italian and international companies.
Magni's most notable work is about the Learnable Theory: a broad philosophical framework that departs from Roy Bhaskar and Critical Realism, to support individuals and organizations in the identification of the cognitive biases that affect both their perception and elaboration of reality. Leveraging the idea that learning opportunities are shaped by previous experiences, the Learnable Theory focuses on the opportunity for a critical analysis of language and its use to predict human decisions and behaviors. The Learnable Theory has applications in education, training, and organizational development.
References[edit]
- ^ Magni, L., Marchetti, G., & Alharbi, A. (2023). Learnable Theory & Analysis. Luiss University Press, Rome, IT.
- ^ Magni, L. (2012). Neuroscience perspectives on culture and intersubjectivity and their implications for technology enhanced learning: a literature review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 373-382.
- ^ Magni, L. (2011). Research proposal for the application of critical discourse analysis to the study of learning cultures. Journal of Critical Realism, 10(4), 527-542.
- ^ Magni, L. (2010). Remote administration of repertory grids through Microsoft Live Meeting in an organizational context. Personal Construct Theory and Practice, 7, 49-64.
- ^ Cartwright, S., & Magni, L. (2009). The value of stories in understanding the past and shaping the future in merged organizations. In Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions (Vol. 8, pp. 43-60). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.