Draft:Millow
Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by Xoak (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 May 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago.
| ![]() |
Comment: The only new source which has been added is the EIC Accelerator one, which adds nothing in terms of WP:NCORP notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Millow
[edit]![]() | |
![]() | |
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Foodtech |
Founded | 2020 |
Headquarters | Västra Frölunda, Vastra Gotaland County, Sweden |
Website | Millow.co |
Millow is a Swedish company founded in 2020 that develops meat alternatives using a combination of mycelium and oats.[1][2]. The company uses a dry fermentation process to produce meat alternatives that aim to replicate the texture and flavor of meat[3][4]. In November 2023, Millow received €2.5 million in funding and €15 million in direct investment from the European Innovation Council to support its growth[5][6]. The technology for Millow's products is based on research conducted by Professor Mohammad Jafar Taherzadeh at the University of Borås, focusing on the use of mycelium in food production[7][8]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Watson, Elaine (2023-02-28). "Mycelium + oats = Millow: Swedish startup emerges from stealth with minimally-processed meat alternative". AgFunderNews. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
- ^ "Introducing Millow: "The Purest Meat Analog Ever" Made of Mycelium and Oats - vegconomist - the vegan business magazine". 2023-03-03. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
- ^ foodnavigator.com (2023-03-17). "Fungi and oat hybrid makes 'completely new protein' for alternative meat sector". foodnavigator.com. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
- ^ "Swedish startup Millow seeking to raise €6.3M to popularise meat substitutes". www.techarenan.news (in Swedish). 2023-03-06. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
- ^ "EIC Accelerator - European Commission". eic.ec.europa.eu. 2024-04-30. Retrieved 2024-05-24.
- ^ "EIC Accelerator" (PDF).
- ^ "Research on fungi behind technology for new sustainable meat substitute". Högskolan i Borås. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
- ^ bishop. "Smarta sporer ska få fler att välja vego". Sweden Food Arena (in Swedish). Retrieved 2024-04-25.
External links
[edit]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.