Draft:ProSocial World
| Submission declined on 23 September 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 16 September 2024 by Guessitsavis (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Guessitsavis 2 months ago.
| |
ProSocial World is a registered U.S. based 501c3 nonprofit with a vision of consciously evolving a world that works for all[1]. ProSocial's belief is that to catalyze rapid, positive cultural change we need to recognize our interconnectedness and continuously improve the relationships we have with ourselves, each other and the planet[2].
Co-Founded in 2020 by biologist David Sloan Wilson and organizational psychologist Paul Atkins, ProSocial uses a scientific framework aimed at helping groups become more cooperative, adaptable, and resilient[3]. Their approach incorporates three different scientific disciplines and perspectives that have not previously been combined: evolutionary science, contextual behavioral science, and Elinor Ostrom’s Nobel prize-winning work on community development and the commons. Combined, these sciences constitute an integrated methodology aimed at continuous social improvement[4][5]
One key aspect of the ProSocial framework is the integration of Elinor Ostrom's core principles, initially designed for groups that were attempting to manage common-pool resources[6].
The eight core design principles include:
- Strong group identity and understanding of purpose.
- Fair distribution of costs and benefits.
- Fair and inclusive decision-making.
- Monitoring agreed-upon behaviors.
- Graduated sanctions for misbehaviors.
- Fast and fair conflict resolution.
- Authority to self-govern.
- Appropriate relations with other groups.
In 2009, Ostrom became the first woman to win the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences because of the development of this wisdom[7]. Soon after this, ProSocial World co-founder David Sloan Wilson began to work with Elinor Ostom and Michael Cox to generalize the core design principles[8]. Together, they expanded the original model to also highlight the basic evolutionary dynamics of cooperation.
References
[edit]- ^ https://www.guidestar.org/profile/85-2965721
- ^ https://www.prosocial.world/about
- ^ Atkins, P. W.B., Wilson, D. S., and Hayes, S.C. (2019). Prosocial: Using Evolutionary Science to Build Productive, Equitable, and Collaborative Groups. Oakland, CA: Context Press.
- ^ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-70632-8
- ^ https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2218222120
- ^ Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- ^ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/oct/12/nobel-economics-prize-elinor-ostrom
- ^ Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups https://www.martinwilks.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Generalizing-the-Core.pdf
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.