Draft:Quintessential (company)
Submission rejected on 27 November 2024 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Robert McClenon 2 days ago. Last edited by AnomieBOT 2 days ago. |
Submission declined on 25 November 2024 by GMH Melbourne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by GMH Melbourne 3 days ago. |
Submission declined on 22 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Bonadea 7 days ago. |
Submission declined on 20 November 2024 by GMH Melbourne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by GMH Melbourne 8 days ago. |
Submission declined on 31 October 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bonadea 28 days ago.
|
- Comment: This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting. You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse. If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor. You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.If the title of this draft has been disambiguated, submitters and reviewers are asked to check the disambiguated title to see if it is the most useful disambiguation, and, if necessary, rename this draft. If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised. Please do not edit the disambiguation unless you are accepting this draft.The disambiguation page for the primary name is Quintessence (disambiguation). Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suggest looking at good quality articles of similar businesses and try to follow the same format. The current article is too WP:PROMOTIONAL GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please don't resubmit without addressing the reasons the draft was declined. bonadea contributions talk 08:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: How does it meet these criteria? bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Quintessential is an Australian privately-owned property development company and unlisted real estate fund manager. The company engages in property acquisition, management, and development, specialising in commercial, industrial, and office properties in Australia. Established in 2010, the company underwent rebranding during 2022–2023, changing its name to Quintessential. It is structured into three divisions: Quintessential Invest, Quintessential Development, and Quintessential Assets.[1][2][3][4]
History and corporate structure
[edit]Founded in 2010 by Shane Quinn and Harry Rosenberg, Quintessential initially focused on property regeneration projects to deliver returns to its investors. The firm raised capital through private equity and institutional partnerships to fund property acquisition and redevelopment in Australia.[5][6][7]
In 2022–2023, the company reorganised into three divisions:
- Quintessential Invest (QI): Responsible for capital-raising activities and oversees a portfolio that includes properties such as 1 Margaret Street in Sydney and 240 Queen Street in Brisbane.[8][9]
- Quintessential Development (QD): Manages property development and construction, with a focus on creating energy-efficient buildings. The division's projects are designed to meet sustainability benchmarks, with properties achieving an average 5.1-star NABERS energy rating.
- Quintessential Assets (QA): Oversees the property management and tenant relationships, focusing on maintaining property value and tenant satisfaction. The division reports a tenant retention rate of 91% across its portfolio.
The company employs an investment model that integrates private equity, institutional investment, and debt financing. Its investment vehicles include three Master Funds and Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs):
Master Fund 1 supported early acquisitions like 431 King William Street, Adelaide.[10]
Master Fund 2 targets commercial and industrial assets, such as 117 Grindle Road in Queensland.[11][12]
Master Fund 3 focuses on premium-grade office assets with redevelopment potential, including 1 Margaret Street in Sydney.[13]
These funds, along with SPVs for specific projects, are used by Quintessential to structure investments aimed at assets with high-yield potential.
Property portfolio
[edit]Quintessential's portfolio includes current and previously held properties in urban centres across Australia, with assets managed under its Master Funds. Select properties include:
- 240 Queen Street, Brisbane, QLD (SPV) - 27,623 sqm of office and retail space, acquired in June 2024 for AUD 250 million.[14][15]
- 1 Margaret Street, Sydney, NSW - 20,753 sqm of office space, purchased in September 2023 for AUD 296 million.
- 100 King William Street, Adelaide, SA - A commercial property with 18,555 sqm of office space, acquired in 2021.[16]
- Port Adelaide Distribution Centre, Gillman, SA - Large industrial site with 167,485 sqm, acquired in 2019.[17][18] [19]
Other properties include 117 Grindle Road in Queensland and 30 Pirie Street in Adelaide, both of which were acquired under Master Fund 2.[20][21]
Environmental, social, and governance
[edit]Quintessential adheres to a structured ESG framework across its operations:
- Environmental Sustainability: The company reports an average 5.1-star NABERS rating for energy efficiency, incorporating sustainable building practices, low-emission materials, and renewable energy sources in its projects.[22]
- Social Responsibility: Quintessential allocates 2.5% of its annual profits to charitable initiatives, including partnerships with organisations like the Lighthouse Foundation to support youth affected by homelessness.[22]
- Governance: The company's governance practices are overseen by an Investment Committee and an Advisory Board, emphasising transparency, ethical business practices, and investor protection.[22]
Technology and innovation
[edit]Quintessential launched the QApp as a tenant management platform, initially deployed at 3 Richardson Place. The app allows tenants to submit maintenance requests, book amenities, and receive updates on property news and events. The company plans to expand QApp across all its properties, to improve tenant engagement and operational efficiency.[23][24]
Awards and recognition
[edit]Quintessential has received the following industry recognitions:
- Fund of the Year, RICS (2018, 2019).[25]
- Excellence in Commercial Innovation, Urban Developer Awards (2023).[26]
- Carbon Neutral Certification, Climate Active (2024).[27]
References
[edit]- ^ "Quintessential" www.quintessential.com.au
- ^ Quintessential's opportunity fund ready to roll. The Sydney Morning Herald. 14 March 2018.
- ^ How to upgrade the office, essentially. API Magazine. 20 September 2020.
- ^ Quintessential Equity to build $400m Adelaide innovation hub. Business News Australia. 18 March 2021.
- ^ Quintessential Equity on how to find the sustainability jewels amid the unloved. The Fifth Estate. 29 October 2020.
- ^ "Discover Quintessential: Commercial Property Development". www.quintessential.com.au.
- ^ Quintessential Equity backs Geelong as Melbourne’s “second city” starts to roar. The Fifth Estate. 2 July 2020.
- ^ One Margaret Street office in Sydney acquired by Quintessential for $293M. The Property Tribune. 22 August 2023.
- ^ Quintessential to pump $90m into Sydney office tower after $293m acquisition. Business News Australia. 23 August 2023.
- ^ Quintessential seeds new fund with Adelaide CBD buy from Con Makris. Financial Review. 9 December 2018.
- ^ Quintessential Equity makes first acquisition as part of $300M fund. Build Australia. 13 January 2021.
- ^ Quintessential Equity secures its biggest acquisition yet. Build Australia. 29 March 2021.
- ^ Quintessential to pay $296m for Dexus's Sydney tower, rattles tin. Financial Review. 30 April 2023.
- ^ Quintessential's $250m Brisbane office deal confirms valuation slump. Financial Review. 2 July 2024.
- ^ Brookfield wins interest in $300m Brisbane tower. The Australian. 19 April 2023.
- ^ Quintessential buys back Adelaide Office. Real Estate Source. 21 September 2021.
- ^ Quintessential showcases industrial strength with $16M Port Adelaide Distribution Centre upgrades. The Industrialist. 8 May 2024.
- ^ Quintessential strikes industrial deal in Port Adelaide. Commercial Real Estate. 20 January 2021.
- ^ Stockland reaps $80m for Port Adelaide distribution centre. Real Commercial. 29 April 2019.
- ^ Quintessential spends $18.5m on Rocklea industrial asset. www.realestatesource.com.au. 22 December 2020.
- ^ Quintessential Equity in $73 million office buy. Financial Review. 19 December 2022.
- ^ a b c "Discover Quintessential: Commercial Property Development". www.quintessential.com.au.
- ^ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vts.activate.qbyquintessential. Q by Quintessential on Google Play Store.
- ^ https://apps.apple.com/us/app/q-by-quintessential/id6471277570. Q by Quintessential on Apple App Store.
- ^ RICS Oceania Award Winners 2018. RMIT PCPM News.
- ^ 2023 Finalists: The Urban Developer Awards for Industry Excellence. The Urban Developer.
- ^ Quintessential Achieves Carbon Neutral Certification by Climate Active!.
- AfC submissions by date/26 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/25 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/22 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/20 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/31 October 2024
- Draft articles on Oceania
- Draft articles on politics and government
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today