Draft:Weava
Appearance
Submission rejected on 19 April 2024 by Xkalponik (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Xkalponik 5 months ago. Last edited by Xoak 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 3 April 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 6 months ago.
|
This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (April 2024) |
Industry | Software, Productivity |
---|---|
Founded | 2018 |
Headquarters | Room 10, 2/F, Block A, Kam Ling Court 532-538 Queen's Rd W, Shek Tong Tsui, Sai Wan Ho, Hong Kong SAR , China |
Website | https://www.weavatools.com/ |
Weavatools Limited is a software company founded in 2018 by students from The University of Hong Kong.[1] The company has developed the Weava Highlighter, an online productivity tool that provides services on the organisation of research and work materials.[2][3]
Products and Services
[edit]Weava Highlighter can perform the following functions:[4][5]
- Organise: Create sub-folders and filter according to user preferences.
- Annotate: Add notes and comments to highlighted passages, texts, and sections.
- Highlight: Use different colours to highlight websites and PDFs.
References
[edit]- ^ "Tools – HKU e-Learning Resource Hub". Retrieved 2024-04-13.
- ^ "Highlight, Annotate & Organize Your Research in Weava - FSI". Foundation for Shared Impact. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
- ^ "Michelle Chan —- Weava Research Tool". michellelychan.com. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
- ^ "How to use Weava to improve student research | HKU Teaching and Learning". HKU Teaching and Learning | Teaching and Learning in The University of Hong Kong. 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
- ^ "How To Highlight & Annotate Websites with Weava | Paperless X". 2021-03-18. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.