File talk:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration.ogv

How can he ejaculate without any stimulation?71.102.148.254 (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain to me why we need this image? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.116.1.123 (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy **** Wikipedia, there's children that use this site!Omegakingboo (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious as to what a child would be doing in an ejaculation article in the first place. 77.78.9.222 (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the point, on wikipedia there is no age limitation like there would be on porn sites, this clearly is inappropriate and borderline illegal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.122.241.71 (talk) 08:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is Disgusting[edit]

Children doing projects for health class will come on this page and see this video. It must be removed, and I am currently trying to get rid of it. I find it highly pornographic and offensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helaman16 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please get off your moral high horse. K thnx bye! - infodriveway —Preceding undated comment added 05:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I don't care about children. I am an adult and I find this disgusting. 71.102.148.254 (talk) 00:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a superb video. There's nothing pornographic about it since there's no depiction of masturbating or any other stimulation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.213.123 (talk) 07:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. It's educational; there's nothing inappropriate about it. - Zhang He (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is me.--86.178.122.223 (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, it's so small! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.254.226 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that ejaculation is a part of life, and that is especially true in terms of health care both physically and mentally. Why don't you get your doctor's opinion about it and then you will understand that such a video is important for everyone, ESPECIALLY children who are curious about sexuality. Actually, I think they should show manual stimulation, since that is how ejaculation is commonly induced. If anything, the lack of massage or manual stimulation portrays misleading information or at least a misconception. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.123.174.237 (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete request[edit]

{{Adminhelp}} Multiple reverts so i am bringing the request here. Local description page for image on commons please delete local description page per WP:CSD#G8.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G8 reads: This excludes any page that is useful to the project, and in particular: deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere, user talk pages, talk page archives, plausible redirects that can be changed to valid targets, and image pages or talk pages for images that exist on Wikimedia Commons. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The video already has a description page on commons whats the point of a local description page?--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no local description. It's coming from Commons. Go to the file page and hit Edit. The only thing in there is a badimage tag for Wikipedia. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is educational he did not massage his penis on on video therefore its not perverted he stimulated himself off camera to the point his penis was so sensitive he couldn't touch it anymore then turned on the camera then squeeze his pelvic muscle causing his penis to ejaculate that's how he did it with no hands and that's why it should not be deleted

There are several pages with female suggestive nudity, yet this one video is causing problems? It's not pornographic, and there is no real reason for it to be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.131.128 (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Must be Peter Browns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.249.171 (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find this both hot and educational because now I know what I look like when wanking and fucking hot babes.

^Good for you. --173.33.54.210 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

How do you get this job?[edit]

Lol. Did this guy like one day just say, 'Oh hell yes I'm posting a video of my orgasm on an encyclopedia today.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.50.201 (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Subtitles[edit]

When I view this file, subtitles now appear that weren't there before. They take the video from (questionably) educational to (also questionably) pornographic. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.92.13 (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]