Jump to content

File talk:En-dust-514-20200903.ogg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spoken article quality assessment

[edit]

Version reviewed: This revision


Technical quality: High


Clarity: Medium


Accuracy: High


Notes: Great audio quality, the extermely minor popping was not a problem. The article could be read a bit faster, and the pacing alternated throughout the article. Overall, great job!


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 17:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]