Jump to content

File talk:Everybody Votes channel spoken (en).ogg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spoken article quality assessment

[edit]

Version reviewed: 03 April 2010


Technical quality: Low

  • Too much white noise in the background.
  • It seemed that you leaned in and moved back from the microphone that you were using.
  • Sometimes you seemed bored, and the vocal tones reflected this.

Clarity: Low

  • Enunciation was not there.
  • Deep breaths took away from the article.
  • Words ran together.

Accuracy: High

  • Read word for word from the page and did not differ from it.
  • Reading from the content boxes could have been a little clearer.

Notes: {{{notes}}}


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Fumitol (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]