Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the humanities section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.
Select a section:
Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

   

How can I get my question answered?

  • Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
  • Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
  • Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
  • Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
  • Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
  • Note:
    • We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
    • We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
    • We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
    • We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.



How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

  • The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
See also:

July 29

[edit]

"Great Thoughts" anthology

[edit]

Does anyone know anything about an anthology of poetry, titled "Great Thoughts", that was published before 1890 and probably after 1840? It's mentioned multiple times in a book I'm working on in Wikisource, with notices like this one that say some of the poems in this collection already appeared in "Great Thoughts". The book these mentions appear in is by a single author, a Alice E. Argent, but I don't know her birth date, so that can't narrow the search. Thanks, — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 14:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the series Great Thoughts from Master Minds, published by A. W. Hall, Hutton Street, London. DuncanHill (talk) 15:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, that's it, since the first line of that poem is in there. Thanks for the help! — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 15:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to be of assistance, many mentions of Alice E. Argent in newspapers of the period (1870s - 90s), including in connexion with Great Thoughts. DuncanHill (talk) 15:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, after digging a bit deeper, I was able to find her full name, birth/death dates, etc., and expand the Wikidata item. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 15:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch - pl. help confirm

[edit]

Just I helped a little (probably new) user in their now accepted AFC article about nineteenth century speed skater Anke Beenen.

  • Anke Beenen#Popularity says

    On 22 December 1879 her speed skating club "Thialf" paid attention celebrated her silver anniversary by building a large gate in front of the house of mayor Daniël de Blocq of Scheltinga on the Heideburen in Heerenveen.

1) The article's popularity section mentions one 'mayor Daniël de Blocq of Scheltinga'.
WP has an article Daniël de Blocq van Scheltinga of a twentieth century person. Obliviously they are supposed to be different persons being from different centuries but on safer side wish to get that confirmed.
2) I did not get why the club would create 'a large gate in front of the house of mayor'? Since I had already asked good number of questions to the new user I do not make new user that I am going after them.
3) '.. on the Heideburen in Heerenveen.' What is 'Heideburen' being referred to here?

Bookku (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Heideburen" is a street. There is a Wikidata item Heideburen
"a large gate" sounds like a triumphal arch of some kind. Temporary ones would be erected to celebrate a victory, visiting royalty, etc. DuncanHill (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the sentence seem referring to 'in front of the house of mayor', does not even say 'in front of the office of mayor' intrigues me; may be I am just over thinking Idk. Bookku (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps a bad translation? DuncanHill (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that can be possibility. Many thanks for inputs Bookku (talk) 15:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)And the Van Scheltinga family seem to have included many Daniël de Blocqs. DuncanHill (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the source used in the article (Leeuwarder nieuwsblad, 30 januari 1937), it was indeed a temporary arch, made from blocks of ice, on top of which three figurines were placed, depicting Beenen, her skating partner Jouke Schaap and the 'ice god' Thialf in the middle. The source also clearly says it was in front of the mayor's house. - Lindert (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the confirmation Bookku (talk) 16:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The street, Heideburen, was then part of the municipality of Schoterland; you can see the municipal border on this map from 1926 (the black dashed line behind the houses along the canal; Heideburen is the red road along the canal). Dutch Wikipedia has an unsourced article with a list of mayors (w:nl:Lijst van burgemeesters van Schoterland), which gives the name of the mayor as Hans Willem de Blocq van Scheltinga. The newspaper article linked above only gives his name as mayor De Blocq van Scheltinga. Dutch "van" means "of" in English. Translating such prepositions in names of nobility isn't unheard of. The municipal hall or whatever you want to call it was in the next village, Oudeschoot. PiusImpavidus (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A 17th-century Daniël de Blocq of Scheltinga was grietman of Schoterland (w:nl:Lijst van grietmannen van Schoterland). Someone got confused, it seems.  --Lambiam 22:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DuncanHill mentioned nl:Van Scheltinga family seem to list a 'Mr. Daniël de Blocq van Scheltinga (1835-1878), lid provinciale staten' before Jhr. mr. Hans Willem de Blocq van Scheltinga (1870-1933), gemeenteontvanger en wethouder van Rheden.
But there seem to be some confusion about name and post if we compare all three articles mentioned above. Of course in historical details such discrepancies can be routine too. Bookku (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two sources that confirm that Hans Willem was (at some time) the mayor of Schoterland: [1], [2] The Rheden Hans Willem, born in 1870, was nine years old at the time the ice arch was erected, which was too young to be appointed to a mayorship, so this is a different individual. The Schoterland mayor was Hans Willem jr.; the Rheden wethouder has the right age to have been Hans Willem III. It is a safe assumption that the author who named the mayor "Daniël" did so by mistake. In 1879, the town Heerenveen did not exist as a single municipality but was divided over two municipalities, Aengwirden en Schoterland, so the mayor in front of whose house the arch was erected cannot have been mayor of Heerenveen. I have replaced the last part of the sentence by:
a large gate in front of the house of the mayor of Schoterland, de Blocq van Scheltinga, on the Heideburen street in Heerenveen.
 --Lambiam 11:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks to all of you for all the search and support. Bookku (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

USA Banking questions.

[edit]

So I do know of someone that owed the credit card section of a bank, $27,000, before the bank finally disconnected. Which brings me to several theoretical questions.

1. If someone owes the credit card of Bank A $27,000, do the other banks know about it? I heard that they do not know directly, but they can do through shared databases. But the database doesn't tell the bank an exact amount, just a range amount.

2. What if you owe Bank A $27,000, but you already have over $40,000 in Bank B. What can Bank A do in regards to that?

3. What if you owe the credit-card side of Bank A $27,000, but you do have $27,000 in the commercial-banking side of Bank A. Can Bank A seize that amount? And if so, do they send you a letter notifying you of that, in which you can just withdraw that money out, or can they seize it from you without notifying you, or do they have to take you to court for that, in which you would just withdraw that money out?

4. What if you owe Bank A $27,000, but you have more than that in Bank B. But then, Bank A and Bank B got merged into the same bank? Heh. 66.99.15.162 (talk) 19:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

First, credit cards are rarely issued by specific banks… they are issued by specialized companies such as Visa, or Mastercard. You will continue to owe the credit card company for any debt on the card, even if you switch banks.
And yes, if you default on a significantly large debt, the credit card company can take legal action and place a lien on your assets, wherever those assets might be located. Blueboar (talk) 20:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the US there are several commercial consumer reporting agencies that keep track of people's so-called "credit scores", which are supposed to represents the creditworthiness of individuals; see Credit score § United States. Lenders can access your credit score. The situation under question 2 is, from a legal point of view, not different from the general situation that someone refuses to pay a debt while having valuable assets. What Bank A can do in the situation under question 3 depends on the contract you have with the bank (the rules you agreed to when opening the account), but I cannot imagine it includes transferring money without notification. If you should know, or have reason to expect, that a debtor may take you to court, then, I think, it is a crime to squirrel your assets away in order to avoid the anticipated seizure.  --Lambiam 21:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jurisdiction matters, as does whether the debt is being serviced. 1. is hugely dependent on the jurisdiction. In some places, sharing personal data is a violation of the law; in others, it is just good practice. 2. needs some explanation as to why Bank B needs to know about the debt to Bank A. Imagine the customer is Elon Musk, and ask yourself why Bank B needs to know this information. 3. See 1. Above. In general, the two “sides” of a bank – personal and corporate – are actually two different bank accounts. If the corporate side is not linked to (e.g., collateral for) the corporate side, in many jurisdictions the personal side can only be accessed via a court-ordered bankruptcy proceeding. 4. There is no reason for a bank to merge two bank accounts simply because the corporate entities (bank owners) merged. More, the debt is not said to be in arrears or delinquent, so there would be no reason to notice that it is (or isn’t) related to an unrelated deposit. DOR (ex-HK) (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To Dor (HK). When you say jurisdiction matters, I guess you already stated that this is not a federal court issue and is state. So 1 state will allow Bank A to seize money from Bank B, and another state would not? Wonder if that's correlated with red vs. blue states. Could the same hold true for the credit card and savings coming from the same bank? Also, would the state law be for the state in which you opened the account, or the state the headquarters city is in?
To Blueboar, JP Morgan Chase and Capital 1 both having a commercial banking side, and a credit card side. I would imagine you owing the credit card side of the bank, had less to do with Visa/Mastercard. Visa/Mc makes money from swiping...
And to Lambiam and possibly others. Before my dad divorced his wife #6, she opened up a cc in their name and started using it behind his back, until cc company sent him a bill, hitting $27,000. So he hired a lawyer where the lawyer sent the cc company a picture of his proof of divorce so he's no longer eligible for the bills after their divorce date, which is 99% if not 100%. So now cc company only goes to her for the $27,000. She is Korean but from South America, where she went back to. This was in 2016. Earlier this year, I spoke with the attorney that sent the cc company the divorce, I asked him if the cc company knew she was back in the U.S., could she be arrested? Lawyer said no. Which means this is still a civil issue. So the idea of withdrawing all the money from your bank when the bank notifies you, is probably still not criminal. Also, there is no such thing as civil lawsuits with individuals. Why? Because when the process server rings your doorbell, you say "Sorry you got the wrong address, don't know anyone with that name that lives here." Or better yet you don't answer the doorbell, and certainly never sign anything. So, owing a cc company $27,000 is still not an arrestable offense.
Thanks for your responses guys. 66.99.15.162 (talk) 14:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Now, regarding if you owe Bank A $27,000, does Bank B know about it? I will put this out, because someone will interpret this as asking for legal advice, but the story is over. Before my dad died, the wife #6 transferred $42,000 from his Bank C, to Bank D. So, why do I go to, Bank C or Bank D. Turns out to be a mix of both. And she put my dad's name in her Bank D so both their names are in the account, to make it look like he was transferring his own money, from his own bank to his other bank. So, that became legal. So here I am contacting Bank D about it. I didn't ask for a refund. I asked to mark her as a fraudster person. The bank responded that they sent my story to their fraud-team. Then I told the Bank D, that she owes the credit-card side of Bank B, $27,000 in 2016. You know what Bank D responded? Bank D responded "that has nothing to do with us." But I reiterated that obviously the credit card side of Bank A considers her a fraudster person, to help back up my story that she is a fraudster, and so, Bank D replied we sent this story to the fraud team again... So, Bank A and D are 5/3rd Bank and Byline Bank. If she owes 5/3rd Bank $27,000, do the other banks know about it? Does 5/3rd Bank not try to tell other banks about it? Well, hence comes privacy laws. The fact that she has a Byline Bank in 2024 makes me think the account opened long before 2016... And ChatGPT says Byline Bank will never e-mail or phone call 5/3rd Bank to confirm if she owes $27,000, that that's not how it works, that the only info they can get is through shared databases. 66.99.15.162 (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]
I'm not looking for advice on how to get back the $42,000, but am looking into how banks can know stories of how other people owe other banks money. I'm also looking for any famous cases where Bank B froze your account because they found out you owe Bank A a lot of money. 66.99.15.162 (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

When I said jurisdiction matters, I was thinking of Cuba v. Sudan, or Hong Kong v. Canada; we have very little idea what country you (or your father) live(d) in. DOR (ex-HK) (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 30

[edit]

Digestion before the Fall

[edit]

Ronald Knox's The Creed in Slow Motion, 1949 ed., is a collection of talks given during the Second World War. On page 68, he says in passing:

I even read a book the other day— not by a Catholic, but by a very intelligent man— which suggested that, before the Fall, man’s will directed his digestion. Think how nice it would be if you could digest your meals at will, like brushing your teeth.

He doesn't mention what book it was. Does anyone have any ideas? Marnanel (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it would be difficult to be certain. I have to assume that this was between 1920 and 1930. At the end of the 1800s, Nietzsche was popular, which made way for many very similar philosophical works. Nietzshe had a common complaint throughout his work that mankind previously had control over the body, but over time had devolved into a purely reactionary vessel. He specifically mentions digestion in some of his works. I remember one passage that I studied in college in which he claimed that the flood of information fron a daily newspaper muddies the mind and trains people to quickly react, not think, as the information is digested and the body continues this. It quickly digests whatever is put into the mouth withough considering if it should be digested and what the nutrients might be used for. Because he brought this up in multiple books and the same thoughts were expressed by many others at the time, it would be difficult to identify exactly which book Knox read. You could narrow it down to only non-Catholics, but I doubt many people who published Nietzsche-like books were Catholic. 12.116.29.106 (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 31

[edit]

Book publication dates

[edit]

For a project I'm working on, I need to check the exact publication dates for a bunch of novels etc. Google is my friend, yet often it gives me wildly varying dates for the same book. A case in point: the publication date for Steve Toltz's A Fraction of the Whole is either:

  • 12 Feb 2008, 11 Apr 2008, 1 May 2008, before Jun 2008, 23 Sep 2008, 1 Oct 2008, 6 Oct 2008, 14 May 2009, or possibly others, depending on which hit one chooses to believe. [3]

I understand that editions in different languages, and hardbacks vs. paperbacks can come out at different times. Also, books will be released in foreign countries at varying times, because different publishers will be involved. But in general, these do not seem to explain the variations in publication dates that I'm seeing. What would explain them? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search for "A Fraction of the Whole" "first published" gives a large number of mentions of specifically February 12, 2008, apparently by Spiegel & Grau. Amazon states explicitly that this is the first edition.  --Lambiam 23:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a book collector and researcher, I would not place much reliance on dates given on Amazon; they often refer to a 'first edition' in a particular country, and are often entered well before publication, which may then be delayed or advanced.
I note that Spiegel & Grau were/are a New York publisher, whereas the book's article gives its (presumably first edition) publisher as Hamish Hamilton, Australia, as one might expect for an Australian author's first novel. The online Science Fiction Encyclopedia (Toltz's work verges on the fantastic/near future) also gives the Australian edition as the first, though (as always) it records only the year, and by policy favours the author's 'home nation' when editions have appeared simultaneously or nearly so in more than one country. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.2.67.235 (talk) 01:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hamish Hamilton was a British publisher; the imprint is since 1986 part of Penguin,[4] now owned by Penguin Random House. Here on AbeBooks a hardcover edition is listed as "Published by Hamish Hamilton, London, 2008".  --Lambiam 09:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, all true, but:
(a) Publishing house and imprint ownership often has several tiers, complexly related, but the 'lowest tier' involved (whose name/colophon will definitively be on the Title Page) is conventionally recognised as 'the publisher' of a work, and;
(b) many large London-based publishers have 'local branches' in other Commonwealth countries; these often publish works by that country's authors which the London 'parent' publishes later, or not at all, or for someone with international appeal simultaneously, and they are recognised as 'publishers' in their own right.
As a book collector (and former editor at a London publisher which was then independent but is now a 'mere' imprint) I often wish these matters were more straightforward, but they're not. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.169.77 (talk) 01:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Enough said. Thank you, all. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lafcadio Hearn story - One man in a boat

[edit]

The Algernon Blackwood short story 'The Man who was Milligan' refers to a Lafcadio Hearn story "about a picture of a man in a boat. An observer, watching the picture, had seen the man move. The man actually began to row. Finally, the man rowed right out of the picture and into the place - a temple - where the observer stood." What is the Lafcadio Hearn story? Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't match the "temple" part, but maybe "The Story of Kwashin Koji"—see the last paragraph of the story here. Deor (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh that must be it, especially with the disappearing never to be seen again. Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 17:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble finding reliable sources

[edit]

I'm trying to add information to Beethoven's legacy section, however I'm having trouble finding reliable sources which give good information. When I use google I run into articles which aren't reliable and when I use google scholar all of the sources are locked behind a paywall. And, yes, I tried looking into the sources section of the wikipedia guides. What can I do? Wikieditor662 (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Wikieditor662 (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditor662 If you cannot find reliable sources, there is nothing to do, because Wikipedia articles should be solely based on reliable sources. You might have better luck if you mention this issue on the article talk page, which will be watched by editors more familiar with the subject. Shantavira|feed me 09:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure there are reliable sources on the influence of beethoven, I just don't know how to find them. But, sure, I'll ask on the article page... Wikieditor662 (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources don't have to be online (links are nice to have, but not essential). A Public Library of any size (if you can get to one) should have (or could obtain for you via Interlibrary loan) biographies of Beethoven which will likely discuss this topic at length. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.2.67.235 (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll see if I can do that. Also, are there any other ways to get online sources, as they're much easier to use? Wikieditor662 (talk) 12:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Have a look at WP:RX. ColinFine (talk) 18:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Google Books search often affords no preview or one that is too limited, but you will not run into a paywall. Another searchable repository of books is eBooks and Texts at the Internet Archive. Just searching for Beethoven+legacy turns up possibly useful sources. A source that offers information of interest but is by itself not reliable can serve as a source of inspiration for keywords for a more precisely targeted search. See also Help:Find sources and WP:Advanced source searching.  --Lambiam 21:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikieditor662, I agree that archive.org (linked above) is an excellent resource and beats even the best reference library hands down. Opening a free account gives you access to copyright works.
Additionally the Wikipedia Library gives you access to a world of academic articles and books such as JSTOR, Oxford, Brill, Taylor & Francis, etc. etc. Alansplodge (talk) 10:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To get you started, I found The Value of Beethoven which you can access through the Wikipedia Library or you can open a free JSTOR account (click on "Alternate access options" on the right of the page). Alansplodge (talk) 10:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you guys so much for this. Unfortunately I cannot access the wikipedia as it requires 500+ edits and 6 months+ of editing. I will look into the JSTOR thing, although I haven't found anything useful from "The value of Beethoven" (except for one thing which I already have from somewhere else), and I do find some of the information on there to be questionable, especially when they said that Gluck and Haydn are part of the 6 greatest composers by far (or something like that). Wikieditor662 (talk) 12:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikieditor662: Until you qualify for the Wikipedia Library, and for things it does not cover, you can ask at WP:RX. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but what I wrote has been rejected so there's no point in me continuing. Wikieditor662 (talk) 14:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2

[edit]

Largest unnamed island?

[edit]

largest unnamed island not created by river bifurcations 115.188.65.157 (talk) 08:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See No-Name Island. This sounds like an ideal question for a search engine. For example Google tells me that "The largest island in a lake is a nameless, approximately 4.0-hectare (10-acre) island at 66.687°N 70.479°W", and there are a lot more Google answers. Shantavira|feed me 09:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The next question would be whether any of these no-name islands have lakes within them... and whether any such lakes have islands within them. (And so on.) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots11:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has an article Recursive islands and lakes. Abductive (reasoning) 05:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google AI responded with the largest unnamed island being an island in a large lake on Baffin Island. Looking at sattelite views, it appears that the only reason an island there wouldn't have a name is because nobody is living there to give it a name. In my opinion, if there is an island near people, it will have a name because humans like to call things by a name, even if that name is "No-name island." 75.136.148.8 (talk) 12:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your report reminds of the mountain called K2, which had no local name because no one local knew about it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots13:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 4

[edit]

Venezuelan parishes map?

[edit]

Hi hi. Is there anywhere online where it is possible to find a blank locator map for parishes of Venezuela? I tried to google, but I couldn't encounter. I think the data is available in OpenStreetMaps, but I wasn't able to extract one. -- Soman (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The closest I've found is [5]. "Venezuela parishes" is the second map listed. Mapline is a commercial map vendor, but they have a free account option you could try. Some places like that give you some small number of free maps (after which you'd pay), so you might be able to get it for free. As you're likely aware, there are 1,136 parishes. Mapping that would certainly be a chore to do by scratch; you may have to pay for it. Matt Deres (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References to Curran and Farjeon

[edit]

I'm going through Gershon Legman's joke books. Among the scholarly crimes committed therein is the lack of a bibliography (despite citing works within the body), so that you're kind of left hanging as to which works he was referring to. I'd like to ask about two of them:

  1. A number of jokes are cited simply to "Curran, 1938". Was there a folklorist or humorist that would fit that bill? Curran is a very common surname, so I'm hoping someone can shorten the list of possibilities.
  2. A humorous poem is appended with "quoting Farjeon's verse, The Sense of Humor". The Farjeon in question is presumably Eleanor Farjeon, whose quaint verses seem ripe for parody, but I don't seem to be able to find a work called The Sense of Humor. The title itself could well be a play on the original title, of course. Does anyone recognize the rhyme/meter here:

The breezes the breezes, they blow through the treeses.
They blow the chemises and through the girls kneeses.
The college boy seeses and does what he pleases.
Which causes diseases, by Jesus, by Jesus.

It certainly seems familiar. Any help for either reference would be appreciated. Matt Deres (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Farjeon is Herbert Farjeon, who is quoted in relation to dirty jokes by Stephen Potter in Sense of Humour "To the bees and the breeze and the trees, no doubt, A kitchenmaid heart responds". Potter, Stephen (1954). Sense of Humour. Max Reinhardt. pp. 10–11.
Curran is ""CURRAN, William" [pseud.]. 1938. Clean Dirt. 500 anecdotes, stories, poems, toasts, and wisecracks. Buffalo, N.Y. (At head: "Volume I," but no more published.) 256 pp., 8vo, with supplement of 5 mimeographed leaves of bawdier stories. (Copy: G. Legman.)" from online bibliography "which originally appeared in the October-December 1990 issue of Journal of American Folklore". DuncanHill (talk) 21:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Very well done - thank you very much! Matt Deres (talk) 13:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be in amphibrachic tetrameter with internal rhymes. Don't know if there's a more specific term. AnonMoos (talk) 01:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 5

[edit]

Volkstedt porcelain

[edit]

Am I right in linking Werkstätten für Porzellankunst (on Arthur Storch (sculptor)) to Volkstedt porcelain? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's wrong. de:Arthur Storch links to de:Unterweißbacher Werkstätten für Porzellankunst, which, although geographically close, was another institution. The article only mentions a brief connection to the Volkstedt manufactory after 1930. --Wrongfilter (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. In any case, I now have a more authoritative source which gives his employer at that time as ""Triebner, Ens & Eckert". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British peers killed in action

[edit]

James IV of Scotland was the last British monarch to be killed in action, dying at the Battle of Flodden in 1513. But who was the last British peer to be killed in action? I ask because I just came across Archibald Wavell, 2nd Earl Wavell, who (as a Major in the Black Watch) was killed during the Mau Mau rebellion in 1953, and wondered if there was anyone after him. If not, we should probably record that in his article - a dark honour but an historically significant one. Proteus (Talk) 14:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may well be right, but Wikipedia:When to cite suggests that you would need a reliable source that says he was. A brief Google search failed to find anything for me. Alansplodge (talk) 16:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would the death of Lord Mountbatten (27 August 1979) during the Troubles count? -- Verbarson  talkedits 21:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, because the Troubles were not a war. --Viennese Waltz 13:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about whether it was a war, it's about whether he was in action. He wasn't. He was an old man on holiday. DuncanHill (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) And not really "in action", he was on a fishing trip. Alansplodge (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Shasu Yahweh inscriptions

[edit]

What's the common name of these? The Soleb inscription and the Amarah-West inscription? They're hugely important, but we don't have photos up. We need close up photos and transcriptions to match of the spelling of the name there. We probably need specific pages for them, since the focus on them is specific in our zeitgeist but Wikipedia's articles about the Shasu and the tetragrammaton attestations are scattered. Everybody including laymen refer to them, but we need to make them very easy to look up and see. I don't want to download Fleming's flaccid and drudging 2020 book again to check this again, but I am. Temerarius (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should also find a way to make the clarifying redundancies in hieroglyphic clear on pages like Shasu. That table, people are going to read it and wonder how 8 or 9 glyphs correspond "very precisely" to the Tetragrammaton.
Temerarius (talk) 18:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of difficulties and issues and emendations on these things that Fleming 2020 and the others don't bother passing on. I didn't realize the common intpretation had so many dependencies. on pages 97-100 of The Origins of Yahwism.
"See Kitchen, Ramesside Inscriptions II (see n. 37), 217 (10). The assumed change from the sign
wA to the sign actually read as rwD/Ar/Aj can be easily explained as a copy error from a hieratic
template, see Görg, “Jahwe – ein Toponym?” (see n. 7), 185. The Soleb-list shows a quail chick
(read w) at the end of the name instead of a vulture (read A) but an alike emendation seems easi-
ly possible. Görg, “Jahwe – ein Toponym?” (see n. 7), 185, considered this as unlikely since the
scribe of the Amarah-list otherwise displays no difficulties in discriminating between the Aleph-
sign and the w-quail chicken. In Görg, “YHWH – ein Toponym?” (see n. 7 and 16), 11 Görg refers
to an opinion expressed by Elmar Edel: Edel transferred his analysis of the scribal mistakes in
the list of African place names of Thutmosis III. to our list and concluded that “natürliche Le-
sung Y-h-wA-A anzusetzen sei” (the natural reading should be Y-h-wA-A)."
This is note 36 on pg 98.
There's more problems than quoted listed.
Here's my copy of Adrom and Mueller's of the Amara West reference: https://i.postimg.cc/bvkRNPpN/image.png
And Soleb: https://i.postimg.cc/q7bKBGgq/image.png
Both of which they transcribe as tA SAsw y-h-w. (I hope y'all don't mind this easier way of transcribing without special characters, the author uses special characters.)
Temerarius (talk) 01:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now I see how well Daniel Fleming[1] obscures his source material.[2]
"The readings of the Egyptian text here follow the text presented by Adrom and Müller (97), with the vowel marker after the last sign, as wȝ."
Get that? That's not clear? It means Adrom and Mueller gave a trigrammaton, and Fleming added ȝ, making a tetragrammaton. This is one of the most deceptive and most difficult to perceive details in an already harmful-to-scholarship book. I think it's a quite legitimate interpretation, but a wrong one, and presented misleadingly instead of argued for. Sneaky operations like this shouldn't be allowed on topics as consequential and controversial as the tetragram. I hope I'm making some mistake, because this is really poor work on Fleming's part. Temerarius (talk) 01:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC) Temerarius (talk) 01:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Fleming, Daniel E. (2020-12-03). Yahweh before Israel: Glimpses of History in a Divine Name. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108875479. ISBN 978-1-108-87547-9.
  2. ^ The origins of Yahwism. Berlin ; Boston: Walter De Gruyter. 2017. ISBN 978-3-11-042538-3.

Blind man playing cards in the 18th century

[edit]

Did John Metcalf (civil engineer) use a Braille deck of cards? No, he couldn't have, because Braille hadn't been invented yet. But his article says he played cards. Well, how, then? 2601:18A:C500:E830:526A:B17D:E5EF:4ACD (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In his memoir, originally published in 1795, Metcalf writes, using the third person, "Cards, too, began to engage his attention; all of which he could soon distinguish, unassisted;"[6] without further explanation how this remarkable feat was achieved.  --Lambiam 01:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the printed ink on the cards was sufficiently thick, he might have been able to tell by feel. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots03:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems unlikely - probably, since he lost his sight through a disease at 6, he was partially sighted (like a high proportion of "blind" people), and could see the cards if held close to his face. Johnbod (talk) 04:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, Metcalf writes, "He was then seized with the small-pox, which rendered him totally blind".[7]  --Lambiam 12:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Baseball Bugs is correct, although I don't believe the cards' inks needed to be thick. For an example see Achim Leistner. He is a researcher that can find defects in extraordinarily smooth objects with his hands. Also: "Many studies have shown that passive tactile spatial acuity is enhanced among blind individuals...", from Somatosensory system, due to compensatory neural adaptations called "cross modal plasticity". Hence it seems possible that thick or even thin inks subtly changed the cards' surfaces' coefficients of friction due to its fibers enough for Metcalf to have felt its variation, especially if the cards were unvarnished and not waxed. Such extraordinary acuity is certainly a testable hypothesis, for instance blind subjects can better discern the orientation of fine gratings [8]: "Despite large intragroup variability, the difference between blind and sighted subjects was highly significant: the average blind subject had the acuity of an average sighted subject of the same gender but 23 years younger. The results suggest that crossmodal plasticity may underlie tactile acuity enhancement in blindness." It seems plausible too that some individuals like Leistner can significantly enhance their acuity by improving their fine motor skills and touch awareness given sufficient corrective feedback mechanisms and training. Modocc (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This may be a question for Richard Turner (magician). 75.136.148.8 (talk) 13:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 6

[edit]

Trustworthy sources for learning about race and ethnicity

[edit]

I am looking for good up-to-date learning resources on race and ethnicity. I came from an extraordinarily ill-informed household and have subsequently tried shutting out their conversation, undoubtedly I still carry poor views without knowing. I am at the point where I do not know the basics and just need some help getting this sorted out. Just looking for resources, film, sites. They can absolutely be "dumbed down."

I do not think external science is the right direction for this. It becomes off-topic at best and real uncomfortable at worst. I believe this relates more to social constructs, which I would love to have more of an understanding of. I have Darwin's On the Origin of Species on my shelf, having thumbed through that in relation to this topic was shocking. Lurid. It is obviously flawed, 1859 far too distant, and while it is great I know this is wrong, I cannot tell the specifics of the wrong except for gut feelings. I believe it would help to know more of what is right while knowing I can trust that source. Parameci (talk) 17:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does Darwin argue that there is more than one species of humans? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots18:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, in the 19th century, that was Polygenism, and was embraced by racists who disregarded both traditional religion and emerging evolutionary science, such as Louis Agassiz... AnonMoos (talk) 22:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source, but our articles on race (human categorization), ethnicity, as well as human evolution, are pretty good starting points riddled with references to reliable sources. Matt Deres (talk) 18:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Darwin says almost nothing about human beings in his "Origin of Species". He reserved that for The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex... AnonMoos (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to hear what the OP found "shocking" and "lurid" about Origin of Species. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots01:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Darwin also had no idea about genetics, so he imagined skin color mixing like paint. It would be best for OP not to start with Darwin but with what we presently know, perhaps with something accessible such as the Y-chromosomal Adam and Mitochondrial Eve articles. Abductive (reasoning) 08:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Skin color rather DOES, at least, have the appearance of "mixing like paint": its inheritance pattern isn't like that of eye color and there's no single up/down gene for dark or light skin as with brown/blue eyes.

You are correct, of course, but a better example than skin color to get across what Darwin and his contemporaries thought, is blood: they believed that each offspring's boys was a blend of the two parents' blood. We still have much idiomatic language reflecting this, but they literally thought that was how it worked. 73.2.106.248 (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are people who believe that race is a concept that can be used to classify humans as belonging to specific races. These people also tend to believe that race is heritable. More precisely, they believe that a child inherits the race of its parents (if they belong to the same race). So they believe it is a biological trait. This belief was prevalent in the 19th century, but we know now that there is no scientific basis for splitting humanity into separate races. This pseudoscientific concept of race also underlies racism.
Ethnicity, on the other hand, is generally understood as being a cultural concept, involving language, customs and traditions, belief systems, folklore, and generally all that is culturally transmitted. It is also a fuzzy concept; someone can have multiple ethnicities. For example, someone can be German but at the same time also, more specifically, Swabian. Or someone can have been raised by Japanese parents while growing up in Norway, participating in both cultures and identifying as both Japanese and Norwegian.
Whatever sources you are consulting, it is good to keep in mind that race and ethnicity are very different concepts. Since it is not quite clear what it is you want to know "the basics" of, it is difficult to give a targeted advice on reliable learning resources. Don't hesitate to ask more specific questions here.  --Lambiam 10:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speculation: It seems possible that the OP has been socialised in an authoritarian, racist and creationist family. Finding a way out of the rigid dogma of eternal and absolute truths requires much courage and will trigger some existentialist fear when a person jumps into the cold water of chaotic free thinking.
This may come as a traumatic and frightening culture shock to those whose reality has been filtered by a secure and rigid dogma of divine law and order. Basically, the OP needs to learn how to think and how to decide without the "security net" of dictatorial Gods and authoritarian masters.
The OP should be highly respected for his / her courage. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The question does have that vibe to it. It would be nice to hear some followup from the OP, but since they only edit once every month or two, I wouldn't count on it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots18:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the subject of Darwin, it's worth noting that he's important historically because he we the first person to come up with a generally plausible explanation of evolution and speciation, and laid the groundwork for future research. But science has progressed massively since then - all sorts of things that he was unaware of have since been discovered, all sorts of questions he raised have now been answered, and some of his explanations have been disproved. As such, reading Origin is more something one would do for understanding the history of his ideas, rather than to learn the current understanding of evolution. Iapetus (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously there was much that he didn't know, but he had a way of being right about multiple things based on (and sometimes going beyond) the evidence that was available to him. For example, the "modern evolutionary synthesis" of ca. the 1920s to 1950s largely rejected the importance of sexual selection, but since then its importance been increasingly recognized... AnonMoos (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is actually very little in On the Origin of Species that has been shown to be outright wrong, and if it is wrong, it is by omission of things Darwin did not know that we know now. The most obvious is the absence of Mendelian inheritance, which actually supports his theory way better than the somewhat muddled, not explicitly described, inheritance theory that seems to have been his mental model: a blending of traits, and in later editions some Lamarckian ideas. See also Heredity § Relation to theory of evolution, which incorrectly includes pangenesis (only adopted by Darwin years later and in another book}.  --Lambiam 09:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 7

[edit]

List of the most important 19th c. poems in the Dutch language

[edit]

Anyone knows where I could find a list of the most important 19th c. poems in the Dutch language? I mean the kind of poems that are in most anthologies and that everyone in Belgium the Flanders and the Netherlands (at least in principle) have all heard about (if not actually heard or read). I don't need the texts (which I should be able to find online) but only their titles and authors. 178.51.2.117 (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a list of the poets featured in Gerrit Komrij's anthology De Nederlandse poëzie van de 19de en 20ste eeuw in 1000 en enige gedichten. It also includes 20th century poets, of course, but if you scroll to the bottom, there's a separate overview of those poets who died before 1900. (I realize you asked for poems, not poets, but maybe this will help you).---Sluzzelin talk 19:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it does somewhat. Thanks. 178.51.2.117 (talk) 23:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"... that everyone in Flanders and the Netherlands have heard about," is quite a barrier. I (native Dutch) went over that list of poets and recognised 27 names, most of them from the 20th century. I may have read poems by 5 of them. PiusImpavidus (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"At least in principle": people who've been through high school and have been paying attention.178.51.2.117 (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those who haven't would know two of those poets: Annie M.G. Schmidt, known for her children's poems, which have been staple food at kindergarten and the lower classes of primary school for decades, and whatever poet a nearby street was named after. PiusImpavidus (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair comment, and I know close to nothing at all about Dutch poetry (hangs head in shame). I've posted a request for help at the WikiProject Netherlands: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Netherlands#19th_century_Dutch_language_poetry:_Request_for_input_at_the_reference_desk. ---Sluzzelin talk 16:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked the most stupid AI (Microsoft's Copilot that comes with Edge) for the "20 best known 19th century poems in the Dutch language" and this is what it came up with:
'Wien Neêrlands Bloed" - Hendrik Tollens
"De Zilvervloot" - Jan Pieter Heije
"De Moerbeitoppen Ruischten" - Nicolaas Beets (Hildebrand)
"De Taal der Liefde" - Everhardus Johannes Potgieter
"De Blinde Dichter" - Willem Bilderdijk
"De Overtocht" - François HaverSchmidt (Piet Paaltjens)
"De Gids" - Conrad Busken Huet
"De Schelde" - Guido Gezelle
"De Leekens" - Guido Gezelle
"De Zang der Zee" - Isaäc da Costa
"De Zwijger" - Isaäc da Costa
"De Zomerzotheid" - Willem Kloos
"De Nieuwe Gids" - Willem Kloos
"De Zwarte Zwaan" - Herman Gorter
"Mei" - Herman Gorter
"De Zang van de Stervende" - Jan Jakob Lodewijk ten Kate
"De Zang van de Zee" - Jan Jakob Lodewijk ten Kate
"De Zang van de Zee" - Adriaan Loosjes
"De Zang van de Zee" - Carel Godfried Withuys
"De Zang van de Zee" - Maria Petronella Woesthoven
Now when I say "the most stupid AI" I'm not exaggerating. The number of errors that I personally notice all the time is hard to believe. Here I am, to begin with, a bit suspicious of five different poems by five different poets all called "De Zang van de Zee" (one is actually "De Zang der Zee"). And there could be other errors. But leaving that aside, how many of these have you heard of? Would you agree that those that are real are among the best known 19th century poems? 178.51.2.117 (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The first two are the lyrics of songs; the first, "Wien Neêrlands Bloed", was even for some time the Dutch national anthem, and I think most Dutch people know the song "De Zilvervloot". If song lyrics count, "In een Groen Knollenland" (Jan Goeverneur, 1866) is better known than most or all of the other eighteen poems on Copilot's list, but I would not include such song lyrics in an anthology of poems.  --Lambiam 08:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only one on the list (apart from the first two) that I remember having heard of while residing in the Low Countries is Gorter's Mei; people that I met could even recite some lines (but not all 4,381 of them). Another one, not on the list, is "De Zelfmoordenaar" by Piet Paaltjens.
I could not find a poem "De Overtocht" by Paaltjens. If the poem was well known, it should have come up. There is a poem with that title by Hendrik Marsman, published posthumously in 1941. Does Copilot also make up things?  --Lambiam 08:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marsman wrote the poem of the century, which is very well known, but of course is 20th century.
I've heard of "Wien Neêrlands Bloed" and "De Zilvervloot". Those are the kind of songs school children had to sing on market square on Queen's day back in the 1950s. The refrain of "De Zilvervloot" is still pretty well known. I've never heard the full songs. I've also heard of "Mei", but never heard or read it. "In een groen knollenland" is well known too, and because it's so short, people are somewhat likely to know the full text. PiusImpavidus (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Does Copilot also make up things?" I'm pretty sure it does. Here's an example of the kind of things it does. It's a digression, so I'm smalling it. I asked something about Scissor Sister. When it was done it suggested some follow-up questions. It likes to keep you glued there so it always suggests follow-up questions. One of them was "How do Scissor Sister write their lyrics?" (or something like that). According to their answer one of the features of their lyric writing was that they write "in character". I ask, what do you mean "in character", using imaginary alter egos, like Fernando Pessoa's heteronyms? (It was I who made the mistake of introducing Pessoa in the conversation) Copilot answers: (this is textually cut and pasted from its answer which I kept because it was so preposterous): "Scissor Sisters' Alter Egos: Scissor Sisters, an American pop rock band, embraced the concept of alter egos or "heteronyms." Each member of the band created distinct personas to write from different perspectives. Here are some of their key alter egos: Alberto Caeiro: A bucolic poet with a simple, nature-focused outlook. Ricardo Reis: A melancholic poet influenced by classical themes and stoicism. Álvaro de Campos**: A mysterious and avant-garde poet with a modernist sensibility. These alter egos allowed Scissor Sisters to explore diverse themes and styles, enriching their musical universe." Alberto Caeiro, Ricardo Reis and Álvaro de Campos have absolutely nothing to do with Scissor Sisters. They are among Pessoa's heteronyms. Copilot made them into Scissor Sisters alter egos just like that (I assume just because I had mentioned Pessoa in my question).178.51.2.117 (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One candidate: the epitaph by De Schoolmeester (1808–1858) for the poet Hubert Kornelisz Poot: Hier ligt Poot, / Hij is dood. ("Here lies Poot, / He is dead.")  --Lambiam 08:19, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The book Domweg gelukkig, in de Dapperstraat: de bekendste gedichten uit de Nederlandse literatuur,[9] referenced in the article Herinnering aan Holland linked to above, presents the selected poems in chronoological order; the numbers 61 to 109 are from the 19th century.  --Lambiam 03:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

M855A1 and the Hague Conventions of 1899

[edit]

This document[10] describes how several US rounds, like the M852 and M118LR, are tested and found to the compliant under the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

1. Has the new US M855A1 round undergone similar testing?

2. Is there a publicly available source to show #1?

I tried googling "Hague 1899 XXXX" for any other US round and plenty of good primary sources came up (including the source I gave).

But strangely enough, searching for "Hague 1899 M855A1", "Hague JAG M855A1", "Hague JAG corp M855A1", "M855A1 JAG legal review" or other similar queries only turn up news articles or forum posts, none of which link to any useful secondary or primary sources. OptoFidelty (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 8

[edit]

Chain of command on a Navy ship

[edit]

For my purposes this is specifically WWI-era and British Royal Navy, but I imagine it can be applied more universally: if some catastrophe befalls a naval ship and kills the captain and his lieutenants, how does the chain of command progress after that? Is that universal across navies and across the centuries? I feel like I have a good grip on how Army ranks work, and the clear delineation between enlisted man and officer, but not so much with sailor and officer on a Navy vessel, or the way the officer ranks work when in the Navy they often seem to be tied to a specific role. Dr-ziego (talk) 12:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See chief petty officer, petty officer and leading rating. A Google search failed to find any instance of this actually happening. Although a direct hit on a ship's bridge might kill or injure several officers, others would be stationed in various remote parts of the ship, so that the chances of them all being killed while the ship was still operable seems improbable. Alansplodge (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A bit more digging finds the case of the destroyer HMS Venetia at the Battle of Boulogne in May 1940:
German forces almost succeeded in sinking HMS Venetia as it entered the harbour... With all the officers on the bridge of Venetia severely wounded or killed a young sub lieutenant took command and proceeded out of harbour stern first. [11]
Destroyers and larger warships had an aft conning station, from where the ship could be steered in case the controls on the bridge were disabled. Alansplodge (talk) 21:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Followup on Alansplodge's comment — at the time, you had engineering officers (who, I imagine, would work in the boiler rooms with the men they commanded) and other lesser officers from middle-class or lower-class backgrounds, and they definitely didn't work in close proximity to the frequently upper-class-background officers that you're asking about. Even if the captain and lieutenants are killed, the ship still has the engineering officers remaining, unless the catastrophe is significant enough to sink the ship or render her helpless. Nyttend (talk) 22:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another example, although from WWII and the US Navy, was the USS San Francisco (CA-38) which received a direct hit on the bridge during the Battle of Guadalcanal in November of 1942. All bridge officers except one were killed, including Rear Admiral Daniel Callahan, the ship's captain and several other senior officers. The communications officer and the damage control officer were the highest ranking survivors and they managed to save the severely damaged ship, which was repaired at Mare Island Naval Shipyard in California and stayed in active combat service through the end of the war. Cullen328 (talk) 23:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely for all the officers to be killed simultaneously in warfare, I imagine, but what about survival scenarios such as Franklin's lost expedition or (had it gone differently) Bligh's open boat voyage following the Mutiny on the Bounty, or similar smaller-scale situations in lifeboats etc? Dr-ziego (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing that senior officers, junior officers, and men are likely to die in roughly equal numbers in the first scenario (starvation and freezing don't care about your rank), it seems unlikely that all the senior officers would die or be incapacitated while juniors are left. Moreover, in that kind of scenario you'd have plenty of time for the captain or a senior lieutenant to designate a replacement. Roughly the same with the Bligh situation, where you'd have time to figure out what would happen to whom; also, in a tiny boat, it might even degenerate to popular vote. Nyttend (talk) 20:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verification help

[edit]

On the article Sacred king, the third unsourced paragraph of the History section says: The Ashanti flogged a newly selected king (Ashantehene) before enthroning him. So that he might remember what it felt like to suffer as a man, to restrain him in his thereafter acquired god-like power, as the Auriga reminded the conquering hero returning home in his triumph, the crowd's ecstatic adulation rolling in waves across his ego, that he remained but a mortal, and must die.

Could someone please verify or confirm whether or not this is true? And what is "Auriga" supposed to mean in this context? StellarHalo (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the "auriga" reference, see the third paragraph of Auriga (slave). Deor (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing I have found is a brief reference in a footnote in a journal article:
Anshan Li. "Asafo and Destoolment in Colonial Southern Ghana, 1900-1953". The International Journal of African Historical Studies, vol. 28, No. 2 (1995), pp. 327-357. doi:10.2307/221617.
It is about the enstoolment of Akan chiefs in general, not specifically the Asantehene.
23After a new chief was elected, members of the asafo went to fetch him from his house. As a farewell to him as a commoner, they gave him a last ceremonial flogging and smeared him with white clay, then brought him before the assembly. They also perforned the same duty when a chief was destooled. Field, Akim-Kotoku, 22; D.W. Brokensha, Social Change at Larteh (London, 1966), 114.
A detailed description of the enstoolment ritual of the king of another Akan kingdom did not mention flogging, so this does not allow a definite conclusion that this also applies to the Asantehene.
I have removed the flowery addition (by an IP) about the supposed moral effect of the flogging.  --Lambiam 07:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 9

[edit]

Implying something by omission

[edit]

There's a word for that, can anyone remember it? Something like paralipsis. It should be in Glossary of rhetorical terms and/or List of informal fallacies but isn't. Example: Sideshow Bob announces[12] "The following neighboorhood residents will NOT be killed by me: Ned Flanders, Maude Flanders, Homer Simpson...". He finishes while conspiciously omitting Bart Simpson, implying that he intends to kill the now-terrified Bart.

I want to use this word for something unrelated, but can't remember it. Any help? Thanks. 2602:243:2008:8BB0:F494:276C:D59A:C992 (talk) 00:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another example: People who drink tea would never, ever steal the spoon; whereas those who drink coffee ... well, the conclusion suggests itself, doesn't it? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 01:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like a language question. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots03:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bugs, I originally posted this question at the language desk but then decided to move it here. I might try there again though. I'm still puzzling over it. JackofOz, there are also cases where the omission is less emphasized. Like if I say "the office is open on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays" that logically says nothing about the other 4 days, but most listeners would infer that the office is closed on those 4 days. 2602:243:2008:8BB0:F494:276C:D59A:C992 (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gricean Implicatures might be relevant. AnonMoos (talk) 23:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! That looks very helpful. 2602:243:2008:8BB0:F494:276C:D59A:C992 (talk) 04:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Subtext refers to the conveyance of implicit information that is understood but not said. Modocc (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. I would just have said praeteritio, but I see you're already aware of that one. If you find out what it is, I'd love to know. -- asilvering (talk) 21:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ellipsis_(linguistics). Or elision? Iapetus (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 10

[edit]

C. N. Barham - minister, barrister, hypnotist

[edit]

I would be grateful to find out more about Charles Nicholas Barham (1846-1923). According to the introduction to his short story 'Tracked: A Mystery of the Sea' in Ashley, Mike, ed. (2018). From the Depths, and Other Strange Tales of the Sea. Tales of the Weird. London: The British Library. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-7123-5236-9. he was "a minister in several congregations throughout England until 1901 when he changed professions and qualified as a barrister. But he was also well known as an amateur hypnotist, fascinated with the potential of the human mind for clairvoyance". I would particularly be interested to know if there was a connexion with either Richard Barham (Thomas Ingoldsby of happy renown), or Thomas Foster Barham, and his sons Charles, Francis, Thomas, and William. Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Beauchamp, the Sailors' Rest, Le Havre.

[edit]

Who was the Lady Beauchamp of the Sailors' Rest, Le Havre? Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 23:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Esther Waldegrave[13] (1826–1898[14]), later known as Lady Caroline Proctor-Beauchamp, the wife and later widow of Thomas William Brograve Beauchamp-Proctor (1815–1874) of Langley Park. She died herself on 3 July 1898 at the Sailors's Rest.[15] The Sailors' Rest in Le Havre was located at 23 Quai Casimir-Delavigne and apparently[16] still extant in 1918. There is another French article here, but it is behind a paywall.  --Lambiam 02:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lambiam: Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 11

[edit]

Overthrowing the Bolsheviks

[edit]

Did any prominent Americans seriously advocate in favor of a large-scale US military intervention (astronomically larger than the one in real life) to overthrow the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War? If so, which ones and when?

Seems like a logical move for the US to do since it wasn't anywhere near as badly weakened by WWI as the various other Great Powers were (other than Japan, which was located too far away from European Russia). And with the benefit of hindsight, it could have been even in the US's own interests since this might have meant no subsequent US participation in a Second World War as well as in wars in Korea and Vietnam.

Also, such a US move would have made Russia free and "safe for democracy", which one would think that Woodrow Wilson would have appreciated, with his pro-democracy and pro-liberty rhetoric. 172.59.128.60 (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not answering your question, but your comments — bear in mind that the US was very isolationist immediately after the end of the war. Much of Wilson's political capital was spent on his unsuccessful campaign for ratification of the peace treaty with Germany that ended the war; the Senate refused ratification because the treaty required participation in the internationalist League of Nations, so the US signed a separate peace treaty. Just two years after the war's end, Wilson's replacement Warren Harding was elected on a strongly isolationist platform. Between those events, just eleven months after the war ended and several months before the treaty's defeat, Wilson suffered an incapacitating stroke; at points he was bedridden, and his wife controlled almost everything (see Edith Wilson#Increased role after husband's stroke), so he wasn't in a place to go campaigning for another war. And finally, the US had other domestic concerns; the First Red Scare occupied most US anti-communist attention, and a postwar depression affected Americans' finances. Nyttend (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One would have thought that the First Red Scare would have made Americans more hawkish in regards to Russia. Remove the Bolshevik threat at its root, so to speak. 172.59.128.60 (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The answer would be something like "but that's overseas, and we just sent our boys overseas to fight a useless foreign war, so let's keep them at home and deal with our own problems". Nyttend (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Was WWI already perceived as being useless in 1919-1920? Anti-German propaganda was still entrenched in people's memories back then, I would think? 172.59.128.60 (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, after the war's end American popular opinion very quickly moved toward seeing it as a catastrophic waste of lives and money that could have been saved by staying out (otherwise the Treaty wouldn't have been rejected), and the wartime anti-German sentiment was quickly seen as preposterous. Nyttend (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Americans were supporting the White Russians during the civil war - Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War should have the details. -- asilvering (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The question asks about an intervention "astronomically larger than the one in real life", so 172.59.128.60 is already aware of that. Nyttend (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The OP might also bear in mind that the task of making "Russia free and 'safe for democracy'" might involve a little bit more than decapitating the Red leadership.

Nobody was delusional enough to want to join a new war right after winning "the war to end all wars". Donald "I'm a stable genius" Trump hadn't been born yet. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Multinational states or empires collapsing and millions of co-ethnics being left stranded outside of their respective nation-state?

[edit]

Which cases have there been of multinational states or empires collapsing and millions of co-ethnics being left stranded outside of their respective nation-state? Off the top of my head:

In all of these cases, there were also subsequent revanchist wars (World War II in the first two cases, some of the Yugoslav Wars, specifically those in Bosnia and Croatia, in the third case, and the current Russo-Ukrainian War in the fourth case.

There are also a couple of other examples of this:

What else qualifies for this? 172.59.128.60 (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is a co-ethnic? HiLo48 (talk) 06:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Iraqi Turkmen and Syrian Turkmen after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1918. Turks in the Balkans could also count. StellarHalo (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HiLo48: Some clues here Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2024 February 27. 2A02:C7B:21D:5400:40DC:49E9:7557:F298 (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clues maybe, but I'm still confused. HiLo48 (talk)
I think "co-ethnics" is shorthand for "people of the same ethnicity". 2A02:C7B:21D:5400:40DC:49E9:7557:F298 (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep! 172.59.128.60 (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Likely almost any event in which significant territory and associated population shifted polities would meet some version of this question. Any answer will need to define the terms being used, but pick a conflict and you'll probably be able to find an example. CMD (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also White Africans of European ancestry. Alansplodge (talk) 11:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In which case White Americans of European Ancestry and Black Americans of African Ancestry (inter alia) are WP articles of importance. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe not the same; the African Americans were forcibly displaced rather than being stranded colonisers, and the American Colonists displaced themselves. Alansplodge (talk) 18:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't read it but:
  • Orizio, Riccardo (2001). Lost white tribes: the end of privilege and the last colonials in Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Brazil, Haiti, Namibia, and Guadeloupe (1st Free Press ed.). New York: Free Press. ISBN 0743211979.
  • Orizio, Riccardo (2001). Lost white tribes: the end of privilege and the last colonials in Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Brazil, Haiti, Namibia, and Guadeloupe (1st Free Press ed.). New York: Free Press. ISBN 9780743211970.
seemed interesting when I read about it, especially the part about the Poles in Haiti. I think that the original is in Italian.
--Error (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 12

[edit]