Jump to content

Judicial supervision (Soviet Union)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the law of the Soviet Union, judicial supervision (Russian: судебный надзор) was a system for review of court sentences, orders, and decrees that have entered into legal force. It was regulated by the Article 48 of the Basic Principles of Criminal Legislation of the USSR and the Union Republics. A review under this system could be carried out only upon the request of a procurator, the chairman of a court, or deputy chairman to whom this right was assigned by legislation.[1][2][3]

It is distinguished from cassation.[1]

Judicial supervision was carried out by the bodies of Supreme Courts of the Union Republics, and in a limited number of situations by the Supreme Court of the Soviet Union.[4] [5]

William Partlett argues that this practice, historically grounded in the legal practice of the Russian Empire, was "justified as a way of ensuring a centralised vertical of power for Party policy" and enforced legality by reviewing the administrative and judicial decisions. This practice was re-used in legal lystems of other communist states.[6]

A lower-level of supervision to ensure legality was the prosecutorial supervision [ru].

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Judicial supervision, Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 1979
  2. ^ Надзор (юридический) [Supervision (legal)], Great Soviet Encyclopedia
  3. ^ P. Ia. Trubnikov, Review of Decisions Through Judicial Supervision, Soviet Law and Government, Volume 9, 1970, Issue 2, doi:10.2753/RUP1061-19400902188
  4. ^ "Lietuvos Respublikos Aukščiausiasis Teismas". Visuotinė lietuvių enciklopedija (in Lithuanian). Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras. 4 June 2021 [2018]. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
  5. ^ Misiūnas, Jonas (1985–1988). "Aukščiausiasis Teismas". In Zinkus, Jonas; et al. (eds.). Tarybų Lietuvos enciklopedija (in Lithuanian). Vol. I. Vilnius: Vyriausioji enciklopedijų redakcija. p. 132. OCLC 20017802.
  6. ^ William Partlett, "The Historical Roots of Socialist Law", In: Socialist Law in Socialist East Asia, pp. 37 - 71, doi:10.1017/9781108347822.003