Portal:U.S. roads/Did you know/Recommend/2013

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2013

  • I'd say just start stealing DYKs from our recent passed DYKs. --Rschen7754 23:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

March 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


  • ...that a second segment of Arkansas Highway 341 was created when the residents of Norfork, Arkansas signed petitions and appeared before the Arkansas State Highway Commission appealing to have the privately operated ferry over the White River purchased and run by the state following an announcement that the ferry would cease operations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandonrush (talkcontribs)
  • ...a second segment of Arkansas Highway 341 was created when residents appealed to the Arkansas State Highway Commission to buy and maintain a private ferry, which was closing? (shorter version) Brandonrush Woo pig soooooooie! 04:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Is it possible to cut down on the wording. Dough4872 22:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I would go with Brandonrush's wording. Dough4872 04:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Facepalm Facepalm He wrote both of them. –Fredddie 23:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
  • In that case, the second wording. Dough4872 23:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

April 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Rolled over nominations

New nominations

The original Sawgrass Expressway road signs
The original Sawgrass Expressway road signs
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


  • ...that the exit that connects the Hutchinson River Parkway and the Merritt Parkway over the New York-Connecticut state line is numbered 30 in New York, but 27 in Connecticut? "Pepper" @ 19:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • ...that though primary east–west U.S. Route numbers end in 0, U.S. Route 2 had to break this pattern so as to avoid having a U.S. Route 0? "Pepper" @ 20:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Usable hook, but I'd just say "broke this pattern". "Had to", implies their was no other choice in the matter. Dave (talk) 22:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Good idea. Here's the alternate. "Pepper" @ 23:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT 1: ...that though primary east–west U.S. Route numbers end in 0, U.S. Route 2 broke this pattern so as to avoid having a U.S. Route 0?
  • ...that the Anton Anderson Memorial Tunnel uses computer regulated traffic controls to safely carry bi-directional automobile and train traffic through the single-laned tunnel? "Pepper" @ 23:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
    There's bound to be a better way to word that, but I'm not seeing anything right now. There's also a picture here, but it's not wonderuful. "Pepper" @ 23:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


September 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


CA 120 has been in the news a fair amount due to the Rim Fire that is making life oh so miserable for folks out west right now. Not sure if this would help or hinder putting a different fact about the route on the portal, but I'll throw it out there for discussion. Dave (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
  • You should perhaps note that I-495 also traverses the Woodrow Wilson Bridge along with I-95. Dough4872 23:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Very true. I was going from the FHWA source, which (though not stated) I'm assuming was referring to primary interstates. We could either add in a "primary" to the above dyk, or somewhat awkwardly add in I-495, as so: ...that the shortest section of Interstate Highway between state lines is the concurrency of Interstate 95 and Interstate 495 in the District of Columbia, which traverses 0.11 miles (0.18 km) of the district on the Woodrow Wilson Bridge? "Pepper" @ 22:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I like the original, less wordy version. Nothing but pedantry is lost by not mentioning I-495. –Fredddie 23:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
  • ... that U.S. Route 50 has had 3 different routings between Ely, Nevada and Green River, Utah through the years that differ by hundreds of miles? Dave (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This is an old factoid that was first written into the article 2008ish. So it's possible it's been featured before. Still I'll through it out there. Dave (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Yep, it has been used before, in November of 2008 (see the archives). I think it's a pretty cool fact, but I haven't been hanging around the portal for long enough to know if repeating old facts puts the featured status in jeopardy. "Pepper" @ 20:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 2013

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.