Square root of a 2 by 2 matrix
A square root of a 2×2 matrix M is another 2×2 matrix R such that M = R2, where R2 stands for the matrix product of R with itself. In general, there can be zero, two, four, or even an infinitude of square-root matrices. In many cases, such a matrix R can be obtained by an explicit formula.
Square roots that are not the all-zeros matrix come in pairs: if R is a square root of M, then −R is also a square root of M, since (−R)(−R) = (−1)(−1)(RR) = R2 = M.
A 2×2 matrix with two distinct nonzero eigenvalues has four square roots. A positive-definite matrix has precisely one positive-definite square root.
A general formula
[edit]The following is a general formula that applies to almost any 2 × 2 matrix.[1] Let the given matrix be where A, B, C, and D may be real or complex numbers. Furthermore, let τ = A + D be the trace of M, and δ = AD − BC be its determinant. Let s be such that s2 = δ, and t be such that t2 = τ + 2s. That is, Then, if t ≠ 0, a square root of M is
Indeed, the square of R is
Note that R may have complex entries even if M is a real matrix; this will be the case, in particular, if the determinant δ is negative.
The general case of this formula is when δ is nonzero, and τ2 ≠ 4δ, in which case s is nonzero, and t is nonzero for each choice of sign of s. Then the formula above will provide four distinct square roots R, one for each choice of signs for s and t.
Special cases of the formula
[edit]If the determinant δ is zero, but the trace τ is nonzero, the general formula above will give only two distinct solutions, corresponding to the two signs of t. Namely, where t is any square root of the trace τ.
The formula also gives only two distinct solutions if δ is nonzero, and τ2 = 4δ (the case of duplicate eigenvalues), in which case one of the choices for s will make the denominator t be zero. In that case, the two roots are where s is the square root of δ that makes τ − 2s nonzero, and t is any square root of τ − 2s.
The formula above fails completely if δ and τ are both zero; that is, if D = −A, and A2 = −BC, so that both the trace and the determinant of the matrix are zero. In this case, if M is the null matrix (with A = B = C = D = 0), then the null matrix is also a square root of M, as is any matrix
where b and c are arbitrary real or complex values. Otherwise M has no square root.
Formulas for special matrices
[edit]Idempotent matrix
[edit]If M is an idempotent matrix, meaning that MM = M, then if it is not the identity matrix, its determinant is zero, and its trace equals its rank, which (excluding the zero matrix) is 1. Then the above formula has s = 0 and τ = 1, giving M and −M as two square roots of M.
Exponential matrix
[edit]If the matrix M can be expressed as real multiple of the exponent of some matrix A, , then two of its square roots are . In this case the square root is real.[2]
Diagonal matrix
[edit]If M is diagonal (that is, B = C = 0), one can use the simplified formula
where a = ±√A, and d = ±√D. This, for the various sign choices, gives four, two, or one distinct matrices, if none of, only one of, or both A and D are zero, respectively.
Identity matrix
[edit]Because it has duplicate eigenvalues, the 2×2 identity matrix has infinitely many symmetric rational square roots given by where (r, s, t) are any complex numbers such that [3]
Matrix with one off-diagonal zero
[edit]If B is zero, but A and D are not both zero, one can use
This formula will provide two solutions if A = D or A = 0 or D = 0, and four otherwise. A similar formula can be used when C is zero, but A and D are not both zero.
References
[edit]- ^ Levinger, Bernard W. (September 1980), "The square root of a matrix", Mathematics Magazine, 53 (4): 222–224, doi:10.1080/0025570X.1980.11976858, JSTOR 2689616
- ^ Harkin, Anthony A.; Harkin, Joseph B. (2004), "Geometry of generalized complex numbers" (PDF), Mathematics Magazine, 77 (2): 118–129, doi:10.1080/0025570X.2004.11953236, JSTOR 3219099, MR 1573734
- ^ Mitchell, Douglas W. (November 2003), "87.57 Using Pythagorean triples to generate square roots of ", The Mathematical Gazette, 87 (510): 499–500, doi:10.1017/S0025557200173723, JSTOR 3621289