Jump to content

Sullivan vortex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Projected streamlines of the Sullivan vortex on the axial -plane; is the origin.

In fluid dynamics, the Sullivan vortex is an exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations describing a two-celled vortex in an axially strained flow, that was discovered by Roger D. Sullivan in 1959. [1][2] At large radial distances, the Sullivan vortex resembles a Burgers vortex, however, it exhibits a two-cell structure near the center, creating a downdraft at the axis and an updraft at a finite radial location.[3] Specifically, in the outer cell, the fluid spirals inward and upward and in the inner cell, the fluid spirals down at the axis and spirals upwards at the boundary with the outer cell.[4] Due to its multi-celled structure, the vortex is used to model tornadoes[5] and large-scale complex vortex structures in turbulent flows.[6]

Flow description[edit]

Consider the velocity components of an incompressible fluid in cylindrical coordinates in the form[7]

where and is the strain rate of the axisymmetric stagnation-point flow. The Burgers vortex solution is simply given by and . Sullivan showed that there exists a non-trivial solution for from the Navier-Stokes equations accompanied by a function that is not the Burgers vortex. The solution is given by

where is the exponential integral. For , the function behaves like with being is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, whereas for large values of , we have .

For Burgers vortex , and are always positive, Sullivan's result shows that for and for . Thus Sullivan vortex resembles Burgers vortex for , but develops a two-cell structure near the axis due to the sign change of . The vorticity components of the Sullivan vortex are given by

The pressure field with respect to its central value is given by

where is the fluid density. The first term on the right-hand side corresponds to the potential flow motion, i.e., , whereas the remaining two terms originates from the motion associated with the Sullivan vortex.

Sullvin vortex in cylindrical stagnation surfaces[edit]

Explicit solution of the Navier–Stokes equations for the Sullivan vortex in stretched cylindrical stagnation surfaces was solved by P. Rajamanickam and A. D. Weiss and is given by[8]

where ,

Note that the location of the stagnation cylindrical surface is not longer given by (or equivalently ), but is given by

where is the principal branch of the Lambert W function. Thus, here should be interpreted as the measure of the volumetric source strength and not the location of the stagnation surface. Here, the vorticity components of the Sullivan vortex are given by

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Roger D. Sullivan. (1959). A two-cell vortex solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 26(11), 767–768.
  2. ^ Donaldson, C. du P. and Sullivan, R. D.: 1960, ‘Examination of the Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations for a Class of Three-Dimensional Vortices. Part 1. Velocity Distributions for Steady Motion’, Aero. Res. Assoc. Princeton Rep. (AFOSR TN 60-1227).
  3. ^ Pandey, S. K., & Maurya, J. P. (2018). A Mathematical Model Governing Tornado Dynamics: An Exact Solution of a Generalized Model. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 73(8), 753-766.
  4. ^ Morton, B. T. (1966). Geophysical vortices. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 7, 145-194.
  5. ^ Gillmeier, S., Sterling, M., Hemida, H., & Baker, C. J. (2018). A reflection on analytical tornado-like vortex flow field models. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 174, 10-27.
  6. ^ Large-scale vortex structures in turbulent wakes behind bluff bodies. Part 1. Vortex formation
  7. ^ Drazin, P. G., & Riley, N. (2006). The Navier–Stokes equations: a classification of flows and exact solutions (No. 334). Cambridge University Press.
  8. ^ Rajamanickam, P., & Weiss, A. D. (2021). Steady axisymmetric vortices in radial stagnation flows. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 74(3), 367–378.