Jump to content

Sutekhsuchus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sutekhsuchus
Temporal range: Early Miocene Burdigalian
Specimen NHMUK PV R 4769 in dorsal view.
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Subfamily:
Genus:
Sutekhsuchus

Burke et al., 2024
Type species
Sutekhsuchus dowsoni
Fourtau, 1920

Sutekhsuchus (formerly known as Tomistoma dowsoni) is a species of gavialine crocodilian from the Miocene of Libya and Egypt. While this species was originally described as a species of the genus Tomistoma, which includes the modern false gharial, later studies have shown that it was actually a much more derived gavialoid closely related to the Kenyan Eogavialis andrewsi.

History and naming

[edit]
The now lost syntype material of Sutekhsuchus.

The species Tomistoma dowsoni was coined in 1920 by René Fourtau on the basis of assorted fragments including a lower jaw and the tip of the snout recovered from the Moghra Formation at Wadi Moghra in Egypt. However, Fourtau did not provide an actual holotype nor did he provide specimen numbers and his material is now thought to be lost. By 1973 a second specimen (NHMUK PV R 4769) had been discovered at the nearby Siwa Oasis and was referred to T. dowsoni by William Roger Hamilton. While multiple studies went on to use this much more complete specimen as a stand in for the holotype of T. dowsoni in phylogenetic analysis, the referral to the species was never questioned throughout most its history. However, many of these studies generally agreed that though originally referred to Tomistoma, T. dowsoni did not directly clade with the modern false gharial.

In the year 2000 Christopher Brochu and Philip D. Gingerich published a paper that argued that all tomistomines of the Miocene Mediterranean represented a single taxon, Tomistoma lusitanica. Llinás Agrasar followed this conclusion when describing fossils (MNHN LBE 300–302) from the Maradah Formation at Gebel Zelten, Libya, in 2004, but did note that the animal closely resembled the specimens previously known as Tomistoma dowsoni. In 2015 Stephane Jouve and colleagues once again suggested that T. dowsoni was a valid and distinct species, citing differences between Hamilton's specimen and T. lusitanica.[1]

In 2024 Burke and colleagues eventually published a study describing the skull of T. dowsoni in detail as well as evaluating the material referred to the species. In accordance with phylogenetic analysis consistently recovering T. dowsoni as only distantly related to the modern false gharial, a new name was coined: Sutekhsuchus.[2]

The name Sutekhsuchus derives from the Egyptian deities Sutekh, better known as Set, and Sobek. Sobek is the root of the Latin "suchus", which means crocodile and has been used as a suffix in the scientific names of many crocodilians. The reference to Sutekh/Set meanwhile is rooted in the fact that Sutekh is known as the "god of deception", which is paralleled with the fact that Sutekhsuchus was initially taken to be a species of Tomistoma.[2]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Although initially coined as a species of Tomistoma, various studies have called this assignment into question. Fossil material of Sutekhsuchus was not independently incorporated into phylogenetic analysis until the work of Groh et al. published in 2020, who recovered it as being the sister taxon to the Peruvian marine gharial Piscogavialis.[3] This study further recovered tomistomines and gavialines as entirely separate branches of crocodilian, something no longer supported by both molecular and morphological evidence.[2] In 2021 Jonathan P. Rio and Phillip D. Mannion managed to recover tomistomines and gavialines in a single unified Gavialidae using only morphological evidence.[4] In this study it branches off from other gharials after thoracosaurs but before the paraphyletic gryposuchines, not dissimilar to the results later recovered by Burke and colleagues.[2] Salas-Gismondi and colleagues corroborated the placement of this taxon as a derived gavialid closer related to Gavialis than Tomistoma, though their results differ in other areas (such as the absence of thoracosaurs and the presence of a monophyletic Gryposuchinae). Relevant to Sutekhsuchus, the study found it to be most closely related to the Miocene-Pliocene "Tomistoma" coppensis from East Africa.[5]

In the 2024 study by Burke and colleagues, both the referred Hamilton skull and the original syntype material was used to determine the relation between Sutekhsuchus and other gavialoids. In this study, the analysis was conducted both with equal weighting of the phylogenetic characters and with implied weighting of phylogenetic characters, meaning that in one version all traits were regarded as equal while in the other some were assumed to be of greater importance. As a consequence, both trees share their general layout, but differ in some of the details. Under equal weighting, the modern false gharial clades with gavialoids from the Eocene of Northern Africa and Europe, forming a monophyletic group outside of Gavialinae that does not include many of the species once assigned to it (most of which instead were found to be relatives of Gavialosuchus and Thecachampsa. Sutekhsuchus was found to be much more derived than these forms and appears to have split off from other gavialoids after the East Asian clade formed by Toyotamaphimeia and Hanyusuchus as well as the largely Cretaceous thoracosaurs. This particular analysis suggests that Sutekhsuchus was most closely related to Eogavialis, specifically E. africanum and E. andrewsi, with the latter as the sister taxon to Sutekhsuchus. Under implied weighting the results are slightly changed. For example, the modern false gharial stands on its own with no close relatives as the basal-most offshoot of Gavialinae, after which the East Asian clade splits off from the subfamily followed by the taxa clustering around Gavialosuchus and Thecachampsa, the opposite order of what is seen under equal weighting, thoracosaurs remain similar in their position relative to Sutekhsuchus, though the clade is much larger. Under implied weighting Sutekhsuchus continues to be recovered as the closest relative of Eogavialis andrewsi, however, E. africanum was found to diverge after the two, making it more closely related to modern gharials. Burke and colleagues note that if it weren't for the fact that E. africanum and E. andrewsi didn't consistently clade with each other (and the large temporal gap between them), it would have also been a possibility to assign Sutekhsuchus to this genus. In both analysis the most crown-ward gavialines are those of Neogene South America (gryposuchines) and the genus Gavialis itself. Both phylogenetic trees are shown below.[2]

Gavialoidea

Maomingosuchus

Gavialidae

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jouve, S.; Bouya, B.; Amaghzaz, M.; Meslouh, S. (2015). "Maroccosuchus zennaroi(Crocodylia: Tomistominae) from the Eocene of Morocco: phylogenetic and palaeobiogeographical implications of the basalmost tomistomine". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 13 (5): 421–445. doi:10.1080/14772019.2014.913078.
  2. ^ a b c d e Burke, P. M. J.; Nicholl, C. S. C.; Pittard, B. E.; Sallam, H.; Mannion, P. D. (2024). "The anatomy and taxonomy of the North African Early Miocene crocodylian 'Tomistoma' dowsoni and the phylogenetic relationships of gavialoids". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 22 (1). 2384548. doi:10.1080/14772019.2024.2384548.
  3. ^ Groh, S.S.; Upchurch, P.; Barrett, P.M.; Day, J. (2020). "The phylogenetic relationships of neosuchian crocodiles and their implications for the convergent evolution of the longirostrine condition". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 188 (2): 473–506. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz117.
  4. ^ Rio, Jonathan P.; Mannion, Philip D. (6 September 2021). "Phylogenetic analysis of a new morphological dataset elucidates the evolutionary history of Crocodylia and resolves the long-standing gharial problem". PeerJ. 9: e12094. doi:10.7717/peerj.12094. PMC 8428266. PMID 34567843.
  5. ^ Salas-Gismondi, R.; Ochoa, D.; Jouve, S.; Romero, P.E.; Cardich, J.; Perez, A.; DeVries, T.; Baby, P.; Urbina, M.; Carré, M. (2022-05-11). "Miocene fossils from the southeastern Pacific shed light on the last radiation of marine crocodylians". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 289 (1974). doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0380. PMC 9091840. PMID 35538785.