This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jennifer Lopez, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jennifer Lopez on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jennifer LopezWikipedia:WikiProject Jennifer LopezTemplate:WikiProject Jennifer LopezJennifer Lopez articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
It is not clear what actually happened to the show. Did it get broadcasted? What was the result? This is very incomplete and unclear... werldwayd (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Again. The show was on 26 May 2012. But oddly enough, all the materials we have in the article are formulated in future tense as if they are going to happen... For example, organizers indicated this "will happen", there are preparations going on, "it is expected that" so and so.... and on and on endlessly in all paragraphs. This greatly confuses people on an event that ALREADY took place and is over and done with. Yet strangely enough, not a SINGLE WORD about the ACTUAL performances on May 26, 2012 in the article! Who were the hosts, who performed what? Who won or got first prize... Did all the speculations we were talking about come true or not? I still think if we don't have such crucial details for the actual event rather than vague and speculative generalities of what we have in this article, solidifies my opinion that this is a confusing page of ambiguities.... that virtually says nothing about an actual passed event. Its creation is so immature with lack of all these later vital information. A brief section with Q'Viva! The Chosen would have sufficed quite easily, less all the fluff we have now. werldwayd (talk) 06:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the article(s) are in quite bad shape. I might be able to start working on the show article next week; I will try my best to. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 13:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
