Talk:× Cambria

Text and/or other creative content from this version of × Cambria was copied or moved into × Aliceara with this edit on 15 December 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled 2016 topic

The × before Cambria is a total nonsense since Cambria is NOT a hybrid genus name. PhilippeS13 (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hectonichus and Plantdrew: Anyone happen to know anything about this? Anarchyte (talk | work) 04:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick glance on the internet, Cambria is certainly not a hybrid genus name and shouldn't have a ×. Could Cambria perhaps considered a species group in Vuylstekeara (and is that a good hybrid genus name)? It's getting late for me, but I'll try to check further in the morning.Plantdrew (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking, Plantdrew. I know very little about plants (I just like cleaning up their articles and writing short stubs about them to improve my limited knowledge) which is why I pinged you. Are you saying that it's possible this article (which should not have the hybrid ×) might be a member of the Vuylstekeara genus (which should have the hybrid ×)? Anarchyte (talk | work) 05:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be redirected to × Aliceara and I have done this, moving a small amount of what appears to be relevant material, although it's still not sourced. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]