Talk:Übersexual

This article was nominated for deletion on December 11, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Metrosexual#Übersexual]] The anchor (#Übersexual) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Is this a Wikipedia article or undergraduate original research? Should this be listed at AfD? --Wetman 11:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Please put it on AfD. --Ghirlandajo 15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's AfD? -- H005 14:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion --Ghirlandajo 15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The ubersexual is a legitimate term, however, I would opt for merging it with the metrosexual article. For more info, please read this article I wrote about the two words. Mcmvanbree 21:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure I follow why someone, specifically the people you classify as ubersexual, are. The artical doesn't clarify exactly what an ubersexual is. the iceman 06:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who the @#$#@ makes up these terms?

Yeah, it should be merged there's no reason for seperate articles for such similar topics, particularly when this one was such a small blip on the radar. Velps 22:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Charlie McGrath[edit]

Who is Charlie McGrath? -- Mikeblas 19:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or David Potts of Intel? He must be that guy who put himself on this silly list. Bad ideas 04:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted last paragraph[edit]

Clearly a joke, as the "advertiser" was born in 1860 and ... Vin Deisel, Chuck Norris and Mr. T? Internet fads anyone? LupusCanis 14:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those last were added just today. I think the ad firm has survided its founder's demise. -Will Beback 19:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(I was waiting for the Chuck Norris reference. *sigh*) mxdxcxnx_{T C} 20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ubersexuals = liberals?[edit]

Is there a source for that or did someone just make it up? Rush Limbaugh seems to be considered an ubersexual and he isn't a lib. 24.130.6.237 04:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there another source that claims Rush is an ubersexual? Additionally, the current statement is a paradigm of weasel word usage--"Some consider Rush Limbaugh an ubersexual." Bad ideas 04:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]