Talk:(532037) 2013 FY27

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lame[edit]

Why are people trying to remove mention of 2012 VP113 and 2013 FZ27 when all 3 objects were announced only days apart by Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo in March/April 2014. Do these objects seriously need to be moved to the see also section? Should the article on 1 Ceres never mention 4 Vesta? -- Kheider (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2013 FY27. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Observation arc / first observation date?[edit]

Currently it says 7.08 years for an epoch of 27th April 2019; wouldn't that suggest a first observation in March 2012? But everything else points to a first observation/discovery in 2013, with no precovery noted or similar. How do we square this circle? 146.199.60.87 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first observation (precovery) would be March 2011 and the last observation was April 2018 giving a 7 year arc. The epoch for the current orbit solution is just a point in time used by JPL. JPL will change the epoch every 6 months with or without new observations. -- Kheider (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]