Talk:.577/500 No. 2 Black Powder Express

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .577/500 No. 2 Black Powder Express article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge?[edit]

Is this the same as the .577/.500 Magnum Nitro Express? AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From a glance at Barnes, no, but... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 01:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the hunt[edit]

Copied from here

I just came across a conundrum. This edit has made changes I don't know how to address. He's correct in principle, but what he's saying isn't supported by the source, which may indeed be wrong. Suggestions? TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 20:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have the source, I would quote it exactly. If the source is wrong (and it sounds like it might be) then you could find other sources which could be written in also for contrasting balance of opinions.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do have it, but it's no longer handy to make the edit as an exact quote. To avoid future complaint of cite not matching info, I'm copying this to the talk page in question. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 01:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the quote? If you place it here then we might figure out how to resolve.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 13:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's just it. If I could quote it exactly, I'd have Barnes in front of me & I'd put it in. :( TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 00:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on .577/500 No 2 Black Powder Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VGN7HnE3?url=http%3A%2F%2Fezine.nitroexpress.info%2FNickuduFiles%2FASG-PDF%2FPULP1069.pdf to http://ezine.nitroexpress.info/NickuduFiles/ASG-PDF/PULP1069.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]