Talk:.bv/GA1
Appearance
< Talk:.bv
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References check out. Sources appear reliable, no evidence of OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Sufficient detail and focussed
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- licensed and tagged.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am happy to pass this as and article meeting the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC)