Talk:1040s in architecture

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge

I would suggest merging this article to a more comprehensive existing list;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000s_in_architecture

or this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_architecture Flibbertigibbets (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that the scope of 1000s in architecture is just a single decade, and there are also

1010s in architecture
1020s in architecture
1030s in architecture
1050s in architecture, etc.? – wbm1058 (talk) 01:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have a very good point...I think my initial impression was premature. I noticed you have tons of experience at Wikipedia..and seem to be the "go to" person on merge, so as a new editor I really appreciate your insights.Flibbertigibbets (talk)