Talk:10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 04:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC) RESERVED: For future review at the hands of me. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Lead and Infobox
[edit]These are fine. Now, on to the substance's review...
Preparations
[edit]"...subcommittee of the 9th Central Committee, which was, in all likelihood, chaired by General Secretary Nông Đức Mạnh." Can you confirm that he chaired this committee?
- Its uncertain who chaired it, but it is most probably chaired by Nong Duc Manh.. THis is sourced already... --TIAYN (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Done "...based their campaign on the fact that is son-in-law had worked at PMU 18 Department..." "...that his son...", you mean?
Everything else is good.
Delegates
[edit]This section is fine.
The Congress and the 1st plenum
[edit]Good here as well.
Policy enactments
[edit]Solid here as well. Pass.
Democratization
[edit]Pass here.
Acknowledgements
[edit]Very nice section here, but I will need some prose from some sovereign states, not just the socialist parties of the world. I am sure countries like France, the UK, and Australia had to have commented.
- Nope, not as I know off.... Western democratic countries don't usually support or acknowledge communist congresses (they didn't even do it during the hey-days of the Soviet Union). --TIAYN (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I've added a bit about Hu Jintao if that helps... --TIAYN (talk) 14:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nope, not as I know off.... Western democratic countries don't usually support or acknowledge communist congresses (they didn't even do it during the hey-days of the Soviet Union). --TIAYN (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Conclusion
[edit]I learned a good deal about Vietnam reviewing this one, so thanks! As per the norm, when these issues are mitigated, I can pass this fine article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
Checklist
[edit]Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | We could use images such as this (File:Nong Duc Manh 2010.jpg), so why don't we ? |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Done --TIAYN (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)