Jump to content

Talk:110th Cavalry Division (Soviet Union)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:18, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This article is in good shape. A few comments:

  • was a horsed cavalry division
 Done
 Done
  • suggest "During the early stages of the German invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the latter suffered massive casualties."
 Done
 Done
  • "meant that horsed cavalry divisions"
 Done
  • "20 national cavalry divisions and 15 national rifle brigades"
 Done
  • link Caucasus
 Done
  • National Cavalry Divisions→national cavalry divisions
 Done
  • 3,498-man-strong
 Done
  • say that Uluses means districts
 Done
  • "Since the command staff had departed the republic" why? to go to the front? concentration area?
 Done
  • intro ASSR when you first mention Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republics
 Done
  • say that a Selhozbank is an agriculture bank
 Done
  • what rank was Onguldushev?
 Done
  • link colonel
 Done
  • link Mobilization
 Done
  • section header Operation→Operations
 Done
  • "the 110th Division was forwardeddeployed to Zimovniki, Rostov Oblast"
 Done
  • "the Don river village of Kuteynovskaya"
 Done
  • "After joining the 17th Cavalry Corps"
 Done
  • "Case Blue, the 1942 German strategic summer offensive"
 Done
  • "by sending forward the 51st Army"
 Done
  • no redlink for the 115th Cavalry Division?
 Done
  • on which flank of the 110th was the 115th Cavalry Division?
 Done
  • "west of the Don, to cross the river"
 Done
  • "shot down 5five German aircraft"
 Done
  • "advance guard exchanged fire with the enemy, losing five killed and 7seven wounded"
 Done
  • was the 273rd Cavalry Regiment a part of this division? What about the 311th Cavalry Regiment and 292nd Cavalry Regiment? Could you add info about the main constituent fighting units somewhere earlier?
 Done
  • "The Germans retreated"
 Done
  • reconnaissance platoon and link reconnaissance and platoon
 Done
  • Panzergrenadier Division
 Done
  • It was actually Motorised Infantry Division Großdeutschland at this stage, it didn't get upgraded to Panzergrenadier until May 1943
 Done
  • 2nd and 3rd German Grenadier Battalions→II. and III. Grenadier Battalions of the Großdeutschland division
 Done
  • link company (military unit)
 Done
  • I. Grenadier Battalion
 Done
  • anti-tank riflemen
 Done
  • move link to Kalmyks to first mention
 Done
  • located in the 110th Division's area
 Done
  • 37th Army (Soviet Union) is duplinked
 Done
  • Großdeutschland's motorcycle battalion
 Done
  • link Armored car (military)
 Done
  • link mortar (weapon)
 Done
  • blew up the Bagaevskaya bridge
 Done
  • 3rd Panzer Corps→III Panzer Corps
 Done
  • once introduced as the 110th Separate Cavalry Division, you should refer to it as the 110th Separate Cavalry Division until it becomes the 110th Cavalry Division
 Done
  • The divisional headquarters building was destroyed
 Done
  • Manych river
 Done
  • the claim for the German casualties caused by the division during Case Blue (destruction of all of the infantry and reconnaissance battalions of the Großdeutschland division, presumably) seems very high, and they weren't mechanised infantry (ie panzergrenadier), they were motorised at this point. Without German records to compare, this seems extraordinary. I would definitely attribute this in-text to Ubushaev and include who he is. ie historian etc. This is likely to be scrutinised to a greater extent at ACR or FA.
Added "according to Russian historian..". I actually mixed up mechanized with motorized, my bad. I will change it across the article.--Catlemur (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the vicinity of the Manych"
 Done
  • rank for Vladimir Homutnikov? redlink?
Added rank. According to Russian WP Homutnikov was Frunze educated and led a secret Soviet mission to Tibet in the 1920s. So he stands out compared to the other commanders.--Catlemur (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "mechanized infantry battalion and 10 tanks" from which division?
Source does not specify.--Catlemur (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the division was incorporated into the 4th Guards Cavalry Corps" but wasn't it already?
The columns located in the Northern Caucasus were, however those at Astrakhan became part of the 28th Army. When the division was reformed all of the divisions personnel came under the 4th Guards Cavalry Corps' control.--Catlemur (talk) 18:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist RepublicASSR
 Done
  • Deputy Defense Narkom Efim Shadenko
 Done
  • Sstaff of the 51st Army
 Done
  • "collaborationist Kalmykian Cavalry Corps" and link collaborationism
 Done
  • rank for Georgy Zhukov
 Done
  • 110th Cavalry Division, were among the Kalmyks recalled from active service and deported to Siberia, many of whom died in special settlements
 Done
  • ISSN for Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the Russian Academy of Sciences
 Done
  • is there an identifier for Noviy Istoricheskiy Vestnik and Vestnik Kalmykskogo Universiteta?
 Done
  • what makes don1942.ru reliable?
The website is managed by Zayarny and the information cited is confirmed by Ochirov (2017).--Catlemur (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Eastern Front 1942-05 to 1942-11.png needs some information about the source of the graphic info added to the underlying map
  • All this needs is a look at a book that covers Case Blue to check that the graphics are consistent, then note that in the Summary on the file page. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Peacemaker67: Added a source. This should be the last one.--Catlemur (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]