Talk:140journos

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 140journos article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Official sources added are constantly deleted, and erroneous, incorrect and biased information is added constantly and regularly.[edit]

I have been constantly adding 140journos interviews and articles in important sources such as guardian and vice for the last 3 years. but each time these sources are stubbornly deleted and replaced with 140journos' official site as the main source. probably the new owner of the institution is trying to remove the old founder's name and his actions from everywhere. I think that the account of the person or people who made this last update is Engin Önder, the other founder of 140journos. whereas the person who came up with the idea of 140journos and founded it and managed and directed it for years is Cem Aydoğdu. I put dozens of links that prove it, but unfortunately all the links are removed by the same accounts each time and only time and 140journos' oficial site are put as the source. The time article was also made without the knowledge of the founder Cem Aydoğdu and the parties also resorted to legal remedies in this regard, but despite the evidence being presented, Time has not changed this article for years.

now my question is: While wikipedia has a basis that increases the power of verification by colliding various sources, why added and approved sources are removed and the company website created by the owner of the company is left as the only source. Interviews of institutions such as guardian and vice, as well as the official licensed tedx talk by the founder Cem Aydoğdu, are persistently removed from the sources. Why is Cem Aydoğdu's past persistently wanted to be deleted? So why do these people and people who persistently struggle and turn Wikipedia into a more unsafe place, can create the reality they want on this platform.

If wikipedia is multi-source and open source that many people make safe together, why are other sources deleted and other authors' entries constantly replaced by the same author account? I'm curious and want to know. 88.255.61.90 (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]