Jump to content

Talk:1610s in England

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1617

[edit]

Camboxer (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    • A further published source for the 1617 claim has now been found and inserted, tho' it would still be nice to have one that quoted original sources.

Camboxer (talk) 10:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1610s in England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]