Talk:161 Maiden Lane

A fact from 161 Maiden Lane appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the developers of 161 Maiden Lane offered luxury yachts to attract tenants?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/161 Maiden Lane.

Wikipedia

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that after a lawsuit, the developer of the One Seaport building had to begin advertising it as 1 Seaport instead? Source: "Seaport dispute settled". Real Estate Weekly. December 22, 2015.
- ALT1: ... that after a lawsuit, the developer of the One Seaport building had to advertise it as 1 Seaport? Source: "Seaport dispute settled". Real Estate Weekly. December 22, 2015.
- ALT2: ... that to attract tenants, the developers of 161 Maiden Lane offered luxury yachts? Source: Rosenberg, Zoe (October 7, 2016). "Seaport condo offers up the next over-the-top amenity: yacht rentals". Curbed NY.
- ALT3: ... that after 161 Maiden Lane began leaning 3 inches (76 mm), its contractor had a hard time installing a curtain wall and filed a lawsuit? Source: Baird-Remba, Rebecca (April 2, 2019). "Contractor Sues Fortis Over 'Unsafe' Leaning Condo Tower Near Seaport". Commercial Observer.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Panzer Dragoon II Zwei
- Comment: I (Epicgenius) may add more hooks later.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk) and Mmberney (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 13:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/161 Maiden Lane; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - something in there.

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Epicgenius and Mmberney: Good article though, it does seem like earwig is detecting a slight bit of paraphrasing that i'd like to be fixed. waiting on a qpq Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: Thanks for the review. I have now done a QPQ and reworded the text in question. Epicgenius (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]