Talk:1692

Years Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts / Salem Witch Trials Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Salem Witch Trials task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merger proposal

Please help merge 1692 in China with this article!--C xong (talk) 02:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sparse events

Half the events of 1692 relate to the Salem Witch Trials? This looks a touch unbalanced to me.--King Hildebrand 18:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

11-March-2007: Few Events Listed - Many of the yearly articles 1600-1699 have had very few recorded events (less than 9), while years after 1500 or 1700 list many more events. Since the 1600s followed the Renaissance, there are obviously many events (recorded in books) to be listed. However, data gathering has been slow for the century: even Google searches for the 1600s often return birth/death/deed events more than any other. Sometimes it seems as though witch-hunts (and Puritanism) also burned most books/records from the 1600s. However, it is a notable goal: Wikipedia needs to list more events for the 1600s. -Wikid77 22:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Format

See: Talk:1650#Format. -Wikid77 22:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.viadeo.com/hub/affichefil/?hubId=0021blweg7pn3crr&forumId=002hj6ldao5cz20&threadId=00226fi31xx53g5d
- In 1692 on 2011-05-25 01:53:45, 404 Introuvable
- In 1692 on 2011-06-01 19:09:13, 404 Introuvable

--JeffGBot (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]